On 25/1/07 8:50 PM, "Patrick R. Michaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 08:43:38PM +0200, Mark Trumpold wrote:
>> On 25/1/07 8:07 PM, "Sandy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Prebundled wikis are definitely something useful to have. Something to
>>> avoid the terror of staring at all the recipes, some of which duplicate
>>> and/or conflict, trying to figure out which you need.
>>
>> I have to agree. I started using pmwiki in Sept. of last yr and I am still
>> tweaking it. It would be nice to have a so called 'prebundled' pmwiki. It
>> would have saved me loads of time.
>
> But the open question is "prebundled with what"? Lots of people
> wish things were "bundled", but there's often little agreement as to
> what should be included in the bundle. :-)
>
> I totally agree with the notion of bundling. I'll even help a bit
> with maintaining the bundles, at least the popular ones. But we
> need some sort of consensus on the particular bundles that are
> desirable. :-)
>
> Pm
Yep, and it should be just a couple for a general group of needs, i.e.
Education (that is me), Commerce, picture gallery, etc ...
That is the trick ;-)
It could get to huge
M
_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
