On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 08:55:27PM -0400, Ben Wilson wrote: > On 3/26/07, Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ben Wilson wrote: > > > Along with [@ @] indicating <pre></pre>, then [@@ @@] could indicate > > > <pre><code></code></pre>. This seems to work for me as the latter is > > > "a little more" than the former.
I'm leaving any [@@...@@] markup for recipes to handle, rather than adding it to the core. > > What's the difference between <code> and <pre> ? I've checked all my > > favourite HTML references and found ... they probably don't know either. > > There's not a lot of difference. ... > [...] > However, using <code> allows web designers to style that block > differently than <pre> blocks. Somehow I think I'd prefer to see this done using classes -- i.e., something like <pre class='code'>...</pre> instead of <pre><code>...</code></pre>. Note that it's also possible to use wikistyles on [EMAIL PROTECTED]@] blocks: %block bgcolor=yellow% [@ This is preformatted text. @] or [@ This is preformatted text. @] %block bgcolor=yellow% and even %block frame% [@ This is preformatted text. @] Pm _______________________________________________ pmwiki-users mailing list pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users