On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 08:55:30AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Patrick R. Michaud wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 02:41:12PM -0700, H. Fox wrote:
> >>>--- "H. Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>Can conditional markup be put a site-wide header
> >>>>that achieves
> >>>>
> >>>> Look for a page named GroupHeader in the
> >>>> current group, if that exists we use it,
> >>>> otherwise use "fallback" markup.
> >>
> >>Or maybe
> >>
> >> (:if ! exists {$Group}.GroupHeader :)
> >> (:include Site.DefaultGroupHeader :)
> >>
> >>since {$Group}.GroupHeader is already included automatically.
> >>If that works, it means the "fallback" Proposal #1 comes "free" with
> >>Proposal #2, does it not?
> >
> >This fails the (:nogroupheader:) aspect, since Site.DefaultGroupHeader
> >can still end up being included even if a page has (:nogroupheader:) in
> >it.
>
> I don't have time to follow this thread, but I'm confused by what you
> wrote. I would expect (:nogroupheader:) to prevent inclusion of any
> $Group.GroupHeader _or_ its fallback, i.e. Site.DefaultGroupHeader
I agree, this is what I would expect (:nogroupheader:) to achieve.
My message was observing that the method Hagan describes doesn't
fit this interpretation of (:nogroupheader:), in that it would
sometimes include the Site.DefaultGroupHeader page even when
(:nogroupheader:) is present.
Pm
_______________________________________________
pmwiki-users mailing list
pmwiki-users@pmichaud.com
http://www.pmichaud.com/mailman/listinfo/pmwiki-users
