Le 03/09/2012 10:14, Pekka Jääskeläinen a écrit :
> On 09/03/2012 08:59 AM, Kalle Raiskila wrote:
>> 2. The possibility to link directly, without ICD, is good to have, in
>> case pocl would be ported to some embedded devices. Something
>> TTA-related springs to mind first. :)
>
> Yes, this will be needed sooner than later. In that case the linking will
> be done statically so...
>
>> linker willing, we can still export also the clXXX API with a #define.
>
> ...I think this is needed so the application can call the actual OpenCL
> APIs, not the prefixed ones in the static non-icd linkage case.
Note that, in the current implementation, POclXXX can *never* be called
by applications: these symbols are hidden and only useful
*within libpocl itself*.
Regards,
Vincent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
pocl-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pocl-devel
