On 06/16/2014 02:34 PM, Michal Babej wrote: > So now that i'm a cmake expert;) the question is, are the > upsides minus downsides worth pursuing this further ? Opinions/questions > welcome...
I think it's worth pursuing solely for the fact that cmake build support should make the native Windows port of pocl one more step easier. It cannot replace the autotools build yet, but maybe there's no need for that. Now that we do not use shell scripts in the kernel compiler and there seems to be pre-built LLVM/Clang Windows binaries with an installer available, I'm not sure a pocl Windows port would be THAT much work. But we do not know before a Windows developer attempts to do it. Is the branch in a stable state for merging to master now? Are you ready to maintain the cmake build support in pocl in case we do? Thanks, -- --Pekka ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ HPCC Systems Open Source Big Data Platform from LexisNexis Risk Solutions Find What Matters Most in Your Big Data with HPCC Systems Open Source. Fast. Scalable. Simple. Ideal for Dirty Data. Leverages Graph Analysis for Fast Processing & Easy Data Exploration http://p.sf.net/sfu/hpccsystems _______________________________________________ pocl-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pocl-devel
