On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:50:29 -0900, Sean M. Burke wrote: >At 2/19/2003 01:46 PM +0100, Mark Overmeer wrote: >>What does bother me is that POD is visual markup instead of logical >>markup; the difference between HTML's <I> and <EM>, <B> and >><STRONG> > >It is a common notion (which you may or may not be demonstrating >here) that >semanticity is binary: either a markup language is either semantic >(logical) or visual. That is a fallacy. > >It is more accurate to say that a markup language can be semantic, >or can >be visual, with lots of grey areas inbetween. That too is a >fallacy. A >language can be entirely semantic, yet fail to express whole >dimensions of >that distinctions that you consider worth expressing. > >In any case, maybe it would help if I put into perlpodspec the >=extend >things I've been implementing in Pod::Simple, so that you can use >them. I >suppose it might help if you could define code for methodnames, >arguments, etc.
Smells like JavDoc to me. Not necessarily a bad thing. > >-- >Sean M. Burke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://search.cpan.org/~sburke/ > -- Matthew O. Persico
