On Tue, 2017-01-31 at 11:59 +0100, zyx wrote:
> > I can give my pdf file here if needed.
> 
> As long as you'll not expose any private data with it.

        Hi,
as there had been private data involved, Fryderyk sent the file to me
privately and I see that with the svn trunk at revision 1818 the
podofotxtextract doesn't crash here, it also prints several lines where
the text is supposed to be, but it doesn't decode the text to unicode
properly. All the converted to-unicode texts are zero-length.

I can reproduce the same output (no text printed) with the attached
file from LibreOffice.

PoDoFo 0.9.4 (revision 1764) fails in the same way, thus it's no
regression from the previous version.

PoDoFo 0.9.3 (revision 1650) fails with an error "Found text but do not
have a current font", thus there is a little improvement in 0.9.4,
though still not working.

Dom, what is your opinion with respect of the 0.9.5 release?

        Bye,
        zyx

-- 
http://www.litePDF.cz                                 i...@litepdf.cz

Attachment: test.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to