On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 06:32:47PM +0200, zyx wrote:
> On 31.7.2018 at 0:51 Matthew Brincke wrote:
> > I don't think any more classes should be publicized,
> > internals of PoDoFo should rather be protected from
> > users who might be tempted to rely on them.
> 
>       Hi,
> okay, that's fine by me. It's just another way to deal with the problem. I'm
> not going to change anything then.

At any rate, I opened https://sourceforge.net/p/podofo/tickets/28 to
decently trank this issue, and I'm going to upload that workaround I
mentioned (which is not a decent solution) to debian experimental soon.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
more about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Podofo-users mailing list
Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users

Reply via email to