On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 at 15:38, Dominik Seichter <domseich...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I also wanted to continue this discussion. Sorry again for the long delay. If > you prefer, we could also have a phone/video chat about these points (also > whoever is interested could join in). >
I will try to facilitate the chances to have a virtual meeting among PoDoFo maintainers/contributors to know each other and take some decisions. I created a form where interested people can specify some preferences about this meeting (like preferences for working days or weekends). If there's enthusiasm enough I can move on and create a doodle to find an exact day. The link for the form is: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdAQrk_ktmgzJI_eZvevfvAlfG5EsttVftouNO3cfUKT2uUig/viewform?usp=sf_link You told me there was once a freenode irc #podofo channel. Since freenode seems to have been abandoned by open source projects, and IRC is generally definitely less popular in these days, I opened a Discord channel/server, which could also be possibly used for the virtual meeting: https://discord.gg/SAVm4DVN It's possible to join with browser only. > 1) Decision on splitting PoDoFo and PoDoFo Tools: > I would prefer to keep them in the same repository to make sure they are in a > buildable state all the time and can also be used as examples for working > with PoDoFo. > @Francesco Pretto : It would be great if you could take the additional effort > and port them to pdfmm. The diff could also be a nice migration guideline for > the future. > I already began doing it. I will inform you about the progresses soon. Cheers, Francesco _______________________________________________ Podofo-users mailing list Podofo-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/podofo-users
