Yes, we have had the same concerns! We though that by having the widely known terms in the Synopsis should suffice (for search engines).
Perhaps we should reconsider and take the original Exx proposal I made on the MQ list. But in that case I would definitively stay away from ESB and use EAI instead (although I would personally prefer EIP for that matter, but then again I could get sued Hohpe & Co. :) ). Any one else care to share an opinion? If no objections arise within the course of this week, we will use POE::Component::EAI as our base. Best, Alejandro Imass On lun, 2007-11-26 at 14:27 -0600, David Snopek wrote: > Alejandro, > > The only potential issue I see with your proposed names is that those > acronyms aren't widely known. Otherwise, I agree with all your > fundamental assertions. > > Regards, > David Snopek. >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
