yeah, i think that should be nice, tho properly labelled to avoid confusion. My biggest currently is the skin.. if i get a moment....oh well... :)
On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 07:05, Glen Stampoultzis wrote: > I agree that the main site should show the development version but surely > there's no harm in providing a link to the released version docs on-line as > well? > > Regards, > > Glen > > At 11:14 AM 4/09/2003, you wrote: > >The site should always show the development version. The goal of the site > >is to get people involved. People who want to use the releases have the > >release docs. > > > >On 9/3/03 8:15 PM, "Glen Stampoultzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yeah... it probably wouldn't hurt to show released documentation and the > > > current HEAD documentation. I'll have to keep that in mind when the 2.0 > > > release comes around. > > > > > > -- Glen > > > > > > At 11:56 PM 3/09/2003, you wrote: > > >> Something that is kind of along the same lines, especially with the > > upcoming > > >> release, is that we need javadocs to hang off the site for the released > > >> version. The javadocs for the development version can still be on the > > page > > >> but possibly in a sub menu (tab?) on development. This would avoid some > > >> confusion with uses who see a certain feature available in the > > javadocs but > > >> does not work because they have the most current release and not the head. > > >> > > >> I do realize that this is still in on going development but we are > > starting > > >> to getting a good enough release and large enough base that many want > > >> need/want to use the development head. > > >> > > >> Shawn > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Glen Stampoultzis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 6:08 AM > > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Subject: POI Website > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> As the project as matured the POI web site has grown organically to > > >> accommodate that growth. Unfortunately I think we're now at the stage > > were > > >> things are a bit messy and it's not holding together as well as it > > once may > > >> have. > > >> > > >> I'd like to open up discussions as to what you think the main problems are > > >> and some idea's how we might fix them without having to invest huge > > amounts > > >> of time in complete rewrites. > > >> > > >> I'll kick it off with a few things I can see: > > >> > > >> Problem) Some of the content is out of date. > > >> Potential Solution) Identify out of date content and rewrite it. > > >> > > >> Problem) The navigation system is kind of awkward. > > >> Potential Solution) Tabs for each project? > > >> Potential Solution) More clearly defining user oriented content and > > >> developer oriented content. > > >> Potential Solution) Maybe using forrest sitemaps will give us better > > >> control. > > >> > > >> Problem) How do we keep the translations up to date? For instance I just > > >> noticed that the german translations still point to the old download > > >> location. > > >> Potential Solution) Need owner for each translation who is willing to > > >> watch for changes as they come through. > > >> > > >> > > >> Regards, > > >> > > >> > > >> Glen Stampoultzis > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ > > >> > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > Glen Stampoultzis > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ > > > > > > >-- > >Andrew C. Oliver > >http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp > >Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI > > > >http://jakarta.apache.org/poi > >For Java and Excel, Got POI? > > > >The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are almost > >definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board or its > >general membership. In fact they probably most definitively disagree with > >everything espoused in the above email. > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Glen Stampoultzis > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://members.iinet.net.au/~gstamp/glen/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
