DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35687>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35687 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-13 15:18 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > Is this an improvement on the new record instantiation code I committed on > Friday? It looks like a slight step back to me, since it has two places > recording the types, RecordType+RecordFactory, while my new code only has the > one (RecordType) Yes, it is an improvement. We shouldn't put all eggs in one basket. RecordTypes should be simple. It's just a map of record ID and Name. RecordFactory is responsible for the new record instantiation. Such design keeps things simple and more object oriented. It is not a step back at all. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/
