DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35687>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35687 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-07-13 16:45 ------- It depends on if you consider things at just the java object level, or at the overall object level. There is a record "entity". For every kind of powerpoint record, we have an "entity". This entity contains details of the type, the name, and the implementing class. I don't want to duplicate any of that information, hence my desire to put all the parts of that entity into one file. Your scheme puts one pair (type+name) from the entity into on file, and another (type+class) into another. There is duplication of "type" across two files, and duplication isn't great. I much prefere keeping the whole of the record's "entity" details in one class, or failing that in just one file. If we did go down the two class route, I think it would be via two auto-generated classes from one master meta-file, which contained the tripplet of details for each record. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/
