Well my opinion is, 'cant we just get on with it, forget all these
organisational stuff' ... but I suppose that's quite naive.
I dont think there's any question that committers should have votes on
new releases and new committers. In the jakarta scheme of things, that
probably does mean that we'll need to be more proactive in getting POI
committers on the PMC. We've been quite lazy on that front.. I hope to
make certain amends soon.
Given the direction of Jakarta, there's a resonable argument in moving
to a TLP. I think that's a shame, though practically I'm quite
agnostic to the idea.
Regards
-
Avik
Quoting Nick Burch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Nick Burch wrote:
On Sun, 2 Jul 2006, Nick Burch wrote:
What does everyone else think?
Anyone? I think the main thing is:
do we think committers should be allowed to vote on new releases and new
committers?
At the moment, committers aren't also PMC members, so we don't have
that. If we think we should have, we need to move to our own TLP,
and make all committers automatically PMC members.
Does no-one have any opinions on this?
Nick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi
The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing List: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#poi
The Apache Jakarta POI Project: http://jakarta.apache.org/poi/
