jkeating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > That is correct. I'm looking at the 1.0.4 release and I'm finding three > licenses and some unlicensed files. > > gplv2+ ) most the html files, some of the .js files > BSD ) lobbyweb.html (TiddlyWiki) > GPL or MIT ) a couple of the .js files (neither the GPL nor the MIT > license file referenced is included...) > unlicensed ) data.js unittest.js proxy.php style.css >
I'll remove tiddlywiki from the upcoming 1.0.5 release, I guess this will ease packaging. I've added license header to proxy.php http://hg.jpoker.aminche.com/rev/e1f06dfe90f2 About unittest.js and data.js: we are waiting for upstream to chose its license. About style.css it's part jquery.tablesorter.js theme packages, it may be the same license scheme (GPL+MIT), but we should ask the upstream: http://tablesorter.com/ > Given that there is no overall COPYING file or LICENSE file in the > release, I cannot assume any license for the unlicensed stuff. The > website has a link for a license, but the link is dead (from the 404 > it looks like you're linking to some form of GPL). It would be best > to include a LICENSE file that lists what the overall license is, as > well as copies of the various licenses used in the release. > I've added a GPL-2 COPYING http://hg.jpoker.aminche.com/rev/cd0b7004a05b Should I add all the license involved, i.e for dual licensed files ? Can you ACK, that ihis would add the following files, in addition of the GPL-2 COPYING: MIT GPL GPL-2 ? > It would also be good to clarify what version of the GPL the MIT or GPL > licensed files are. If not clarified, the earliest version must be > assumed, which allows for any later, IE GPL+. > Maybe we should ask jquery/jquery.tablesorter upstream about that? Thanks for all your insights about proper licensing/packaging. -- bou ^ _______________________________________________ Pokersource-users mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/pokersource-users
