Pani Mirko,
To pisze, jest oczywiscie moja opinia, aby nie bylo niedomowien.
Dla mnie oczywista rzecza jest Pani upodobanie Al Gore'a & Co i rownie
oczywista rzecza jest, ze podklada Pani teksty, nazwijmy to jednostronne.
Czesc z tych tekstow jest autorstwa roznych guru, krecacych sie wokol
Demokratow. Ale mniejsza z tym. W moim odczuciu, Clinton, Al Gore,
Lieberman i paru jeszcze innych, mowia tylko wtedy prawde jak sie pomyla.
Jezeli ich tak boli w pewnym sensie Floryda, to winni odpowiedziec za
wyslanych 1.1 miliona listow do osob ZUPELNIE nieuprawnionych do
glosowania, z czego okolo 700 tysiecy glosowalo. Winni tez odpowiedziec
przed Amerykanami za przyspieszanie obywatelstwa dla Latynosow w Kaliforni.
Ale zostawmy to na boku takze.
Wrocmy do Pani postingu o Houston(zanieczyszczony, itp). Tak jest on
zanieczyszczony, ale 25 lat temu zostala zrobiona praca na temat
mikroklimatu wlasnie w Houston, gdzie napisano w konkluzji, ze ze wzgledu
na unikalnosc polozenia miasta, nigdy w nim nie bedzie mozliwe uzyskanie
nawet owczesnych standardow srodowiskowych. Tak wiec nie zwalajmy winy
tylko na gubernatora Busha. Praca/ raport zostala napisana przez zespol
dosyc daleko w pogladach od Republikanow i Demokratow. To mozna znalezc,
aczkolwiek z trudem na internecie. O ile sie nie myle,fragmenty z tego
raportu byly nie raz cytowane przez amerykanska prase,ktore Gore absolutnie
ignorowal.
Ponizej podaje Pani artykul o Xavier Suarez, zapominajac tylko dodac-
wlasciwie powinien to byl zrobic autor, ze jego sprawa dotarla do SN, ktory
zwrocil ja do "powtornego rozpatrzenia ze wzgledu na caly szereg
niescislosci technicznych i prawnych". Wsrod niescislosci sa wymienione
"naciski na swiadkow, inne daty i godziny, znacznie sie rozniace od
wydarzen". Ale zostawmy to tez na boku. W kazdym badz razie, jak narazie
not guilty till proven-:).
Wazniejsza sprawa sa druki wyborcze, ktore zostaly ZROBIONE PRZEZ
DEMOKRATOW, co skrzetnie pomija w wywiadach Warren Christopher, obserwator
ze strony D.,i nagle attorney for Al Gore(za CNN).
A przeciez jest to chyba sprawa najwazniejsza. Czyz nie. I zrobiona przez
samych Demokratow.
Wsrod "gwiazd" po stronie Al Gore'a brakuje tylko chyba Cocrane'a i
Shapiro. Kto wie moze sie i znajda, skoro pojawil sie juz the most rev.
Jessssssssssssie Jackson i jak zwykle wyskoczyl z bialymi i czarnymi.
A prawda jest taka, ze Demokraci oszukiwali przy kazdych wyborach,
poczawszy od roku 60-tego. Chocby przyklad Nixona versus JFK, ktory
dzentelmensko nie zarzadal powtornego liczenia. Pisze o tym, podajc dowody
i wymieniajac nazwiska Walter Berns, zaciekly Demokrata(tak siebie sam
nazywa),Resident Scholar z American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy
Research, professor emiritus nauk politycznych przy Georgtown University w
Washinton,DC. Jeden tylko cytat:..."there was a proven and strong evidence
odf vote fraud and chicanery of the Democrats and it is continuing to today
since. At every possible occasion regardles of situation"... Rownie w tym
tonie jest ksiazka autorstwa innego Demokraty, prof.Christophera Matthews,
pt. Kennedy and Nixon.
Nie chce wspominac tu o mediach, robiacych wszystko, aby urabiac opinie na
Florydzie i przed telewizorami. Ale jest to wszystko zenujace, smutne i
sklaniajace ku mdlosciom. Wczoraj pisano i mowiono w CNN o "kilkudziesieciu
tysiacach glosow z Izraela"(dla przykladu), dzisiaj zmmieniono ton na jeden
tysiac, poswiecajc temu moze 2 sekundy. Przykladow mozna mnozyc, skolko ugodno.
Jeszcze ciekawsze, IMHO, bedzie dalsze postepowanie Demokratow, pragnacych
za wszelka, ale to wszelka cene posadzic AL Gore'a w Bialym Domu. Trzeba
przeciez splacic zaciagniete dlugi tak fianasowe, jak i polityczne. Co wiec
zrobia? Tu przytaczam artykul kolejnego Demokraty, zyczac przyjemnej lektury.
***
The Coming Gore Air War
How the Democrats Plan to Subvert the Electoral College
By Michael Long
Frontpagemag.com | November 9, 2000
URL: http://www.frontpagemag.com/archives/politics/long11-09-00p.htm
GORE WINS the popular vote. Bush wins the electoral vote. That's what's
likely. And now Gore will spend the rest of that DNC soft money of his in
the campaign of his life to subvert the Electoral College.
You didn't think he was just going to take this lying down, did you?
The Democrats are about to launch their biggest, dirtiest campaign in
modern history. This is the one that you'll tell your grandkids about.
The Supreme Court would immediately rebuff any Democrat effort to subvert
the system of the Electoral College outside of constitutional amendment.
The lefty justices on the east side of the Capitol may be hearty
ideologues, but even they will defend this obvious bit of constitutional
writ. Al Gore knows that, too. So how will he get the Electoral College to
go his way?
It's as easy as demagoguery. He'll even get some conservatives to come
tagging along for him in the name of the great good public.
As early as this weekend, expect Al Gore to launch a massive media
campaign -- commercials, interviews, whisper campaigns, maybe even a
repeat of the kind of travel he's done personally for the last year. And
the message will be this: I am Al Gore, and I won the popular vote for the
presidency of the United States. The electors in your state have an
obligation to enforce the will of the people. Contact your electors and
tell them that you want them to vote in the Electoral College for Al Gore,
the popularly elected president of the United States.
Expect the focus to be twofold. First, Gore will focus on the states where
electors are not bound by statute to vote for the candidate on whose
behalf they were elected. Second, and most important, Gore will take his
case directly to the people. He will say that their will is being
subverted, that they elected him properly and honestly and by a majority,
and that the Republicans are about to take away even their right to say
who leads them.
It will be powerful, and it might just be successful. The media will
support Gore's effort, and the usual crowd of subservient, liberal
academics will, too. They'll sign full-page ads in the Washington Post and
the New York Times, saying that the will of the people is about to be
tossed away by an anachronistic system over two centuries old. Look for a
couple of ex-presidents (you know who you are, gentlemen) to turn the
pressure on with public statements and Gore support for his dirty little
campaign.
Finally, expect the case to be made that subverting the will of the people
is getting to be the Republican way of doing business.
First, so they will say, the Republicans tried to overthrow the popularly
elected president by impeachment against what the people said they wanted.
Now they are trying to steal an election outright away from the people.
This kind of case is exactly why the rule of law is so important -- the
very rule of law that Republicans suffered to protect during impeachment.
What a surprise that the question of whether or not Bill Clinton truly
undercut the rule of law in the mind of the people will be answered so
soon.
Sadly, I fear we already know the outcome.
Michael Long is a director of the White House Writers Group.
E N D
------------
W.Glowacki
----
At 11:12 AM 11/9/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>O bylym prezydencie Miami, pozbawionym urzedu za udzial w falszowaniu
>wyborow w '97, obecnie bioracym udzial w liczeniu glosow absentee w
>Miami-Dade County jako czlonek lokalnego republikanskiego executive
>committee.
>
>Mirka
[...]
