Hello List,
I've been using policyd-weight in warn_if_reject mode for a couple of
weeks and intend on doing so for a few more weeks. So far i appear to
satisfied with the results.
I already reject based on sbl-xbl and dsbl at the MTA and do not intend
on changing this behavior. Based on some experience and some lookups for
listed IP addresses i intend on replacing the default dnsbls with these.
# HOST, BAD SCORE, GOOD SCORE, LOG NAME
'dynablock.njabl.org', 3.25, -1, 'DYN_NJABL',
'bl.spamcop.net', 3.75, -1.5, 'SPAMCOP',
'dnsbl.njabl.org', 4.25, -1.5, 'BL_NJABL',
'relays.ordb.org', 3.25, 0, 'ORDB_ORG',
'psbl.surriel.com', 4.35, 1, 'PSBL',
'spam.tqmcube.com', 3.75, 0, 'TQM_SPAM',
'ko.tqmcube.com', 4.35, 0, 'TQM_KOREA'
);
Ignore the scores in the above list as that is where i need your
assistance. What ought to be the basis for scoring of these RBLs?
Another thing, how does one use multi-lookup rbls? say one composite RBL
returning different codes for different listing reasons.
thanks,
- dhawal
____________________________________________________________
Policyd-weight Mailinglist - http://www.policyd-weight.org/
