I really don't think it is necessary to look much further than the referenced web site to see that the guy is all about himself, all ego. His tome is written in the first person, begins with 'I' and is littered with undocumented references to himself, hosts his picture as the main visual element. There is little to distinguish him as the leader of an ideology other than himself.
LeaNder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks, this was interesting. Although I do not have the time to look into this more closely. The question the article does not answer however is, why this guy, like most US media strongly supported the war against Iraq. Is this connected with his White Supremacist soul. And what about all the "white suprematists" that would love to take "the Jews" into their fold? What it looks from over here many, many media neocons do not have any problem to work with this "fringe" part of society. And others notice this more and more often. -jo > http://georgearchibald.typepad.com/george_archibald/2007/04/06/index.html > > -- > Michael Pugliese > --------------------------------- Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
