d.b. The only answer she actually gave was one i could teach to a fucking parrot, "all options are on the table". That's it period, the sum total.
The rest of your post concerned only how she looked and your opinion of how Gibson looked. Sorry, but BFD. Not exactly a Lincoln/Douglas debate. Maybe, just maybe he asked the question again because he wanted something more definitive than "all options on on the table". On Sep 11, 6:30 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 11, 7:13 pm, mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > man I forgot it was on. did she kick his butt? put him in his place? > > Polite but firm, looked him straight in the eye... said she was ready > to take over as president if necessary. Gibson pressed on the Bush > doctrine of "preemption," specifically regarding Pakistan - she > responded "all options are [remain] on the table." He asked again, > claiming he was lost in the avalanche of words, he, and intellectual, > an elitist, a man of astounding stature - "lost." > > Interesting, Sarah looked confident, assured - Gibson did not, > constantly twisting his foot, while trying to appear superior, > elitist. Still, he seemed almost appalled by her directness, her stare > - like, 'how dare she!' And looking down his nose like a typical > liberal schmuck just out of NYU. > > I suspect Gibson wants a do-over. With all his wonderments he couldn't > rattle her. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
