[ Demand no Bailout without a FDIC type of max Limit ! ] that and a cap on CEO salaries with a ban on the practice of golden parachutes On Sep 22, 5:17 am, "R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This robbery is the direct result of the rich owning puppet > politicians, we aught to hang the whole stinking crowd for treason. > > This is the last desperate act of the rich robbing the poor and > middle > class. > > They want Class Warfare, their about to see it in the Tune of the > French Revolution times One Hundred Million! > > I say OFF with all these corrupt thieving bastards' Heads. > > Let them know the true wrath of the majority of citizens who's lives > are being utterly destroyed by the wholesale robbery of the Treasury > and the massive devaluation of the Dollar that goes with this > Bailout. > > Be ready to start bartering because your money will be worthless > after > this Bailout. > > President George W. Bush owns this Major Depression and shall go down > in History as the worst most corrupt elitist puppet President in U.S. > History along with his De-Regulating Clone John McCain who's talk > doesn't even begin to agree with his voting record. (Don't be fooled > he is still one of the corrupt Keating 5 and will stab all common > citizens in the back just like G.W. Bush did, if he is elected - his > wife is worth 100 million dollars he is so out of touch he can't > begin > to understand the common man's plight). > > Follow the money on these Bailouts, Who's Receiving more than what > the > FDIC gaurantees to the common citizen. (maximum of $100,000 return) > for any investment of $100,000 or greater. That means if they had > invested more than $100,000 the maximum they could get back from the > bailout would be $100,000 no matter what! > > We don't owe them anything! At least we should set limits! > > Why should we make retro-active an insurance policy to bad, > incompetent, and corrupt management and on top of that allow the > perpetrators to walk away scott-free? This only helps rich political > insider elites at the expense of the common taxpaying citizens, why > in > the world should we agree to this outright illegal robbery our taxes > were never meant to protect greedy rich investors but only to run our > country and Congress has no right to spend it for other purposes. > > The Boston Tea Party was a direct result of taxation without > representation! > > This Bailout is a Taxation without common taxpaying citizen > representation! > > We are the Majority! If we allow Congress to commit this robbery we > are just as accountable for the destruction of the United States as > they are! > > Demand no Bailout without a FDIC type of max Limit, we own no-rich > investor a greater benefit than we are alloted by their banks, > anything more than that is a misuse of Taxpayer funds and We must not > allow it. > > If we do, we are Idiots and deserve what we get for these wasted tax > dollars! > > Email and / or call your US Senators and US Congress person and > demand > they limit Investor benefits to less then what the FDIC provides! > > Its your money their giving to the bad investing rich. Demand limits. > > Please Contact your U.S. Senators and U.S. House Representative > Today, > definately before Wednesday the 24th. > > CONTACT INFORMATION for U.S. SENATE & HOUSE > > http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-63874-0-days0-orderasc-.html > > Email Congressional Staff members to make your voice heard > > http://www.outsourcecongress.org/outsource/congress/schstaffers.html > > On Sep 22, 4:00 am, "mike532 [ Republicans for Obama ]" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Democrats Set Bailout Conditions as Treasury Chief Rallies > > Supporthttp://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/22/business/22paulson.html?_r=1&th&emc... > > »WASHINGTON — Congressional Democrats began to set their own terms on > > Sunday for a plan to rescue the nation’s financial institutions, > > including greater legislative oversight of the Treasury Department, > > more direct assistance for homeowners and limits on the pay of top > > executives whose firms seek help. > > > The Democrats’ demands came as Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. > > blanketed the Sunday talk shows to promote the Bush administration’s > > $700 billion bailout package, emphasizing that it was needed not just > > for Wall Street, but for all Americans. He urged Congress to move > > swiftly to approve a “clean” rescue plan without tacking on extra > > programs. > > > “I hate the fact that we have to do it, but it’s better than the > > alternative,” Mr. Paulson said on “Fox News Sunday.” > > > The Bush administration proposal could be the largest government > > bailout of private industry in the nation’s history, and it calls for > > nearly unfettered powers to the Treasury secretary. There is intense > > pressure to pass a rescue measure quickly because the markets remain > > jittery. > > > Still, competing interests were already complicating the negotiations, > > as Democrats pushed for assistance for distressed homeowners and for > > oversight authority of the bailout program. Some lawmakers also said > > they did not want to be rushed into approving extraordinary new powers > > for the Treasury secretary and the government without full > > consideration of the consequences. > > > Both presidential nominees, who face the prospect of inheriting an > > enormous new program, said there had to be more oversight of the > > Treasury Department than the Bush administration had proposed. > > > Financial companies were already lobbying to broaden the plan. And the > > Bush administration did indeed widen the scope by allowing the > > government to buy out assets other than mortgage-related securities as > > well as making foreign companies eligible for government assistance. > > > Banks and traders also braced themselves for another tumultuous week > > in the markets. But early signs indicate that investors in Asia were > > reacting positively to the developments in Washington. Shares in Asia > > jumped in early trading on Monday morning, as investors took their > > cues from a rally on Wall Street on Friday. The Nikkei 225 index > > climbed 2 percent in early trading in Tokyo, and the Kospi index rose > > 3 percent in Seoul, South Korea. > > > The Standard & Poor’s/Australia Stock Exchange 200 index increased 3.6 > > percent after markets there opened a half-hour late. The opening was > > delayed to allow time for further details to be issued regarding a > > monthlong ban imposed by Australian regulators on all short selling of > > shares traded on the exchange. > > > Meanwhile, top Democrats and Republicans on Capitol Hill said on > > Sunday that they would act swiftly on the administration’s request, > > but not without setting their own conditions. > > > “Congress will respond to the financial markets crisis by taking > > action this week in a bipartisan manner that will protect the > > taxpayers’ interests,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said. She added that > > the administration’s proposal did “not include the necessary > > safeguards. Democrats believe a responsible solution should include > > independent oversight, protections for homeowners and constraints on > > excessive executive compensation.” > > > “We will not simply hand over a $700 billion blank check to Wall > > Street and hope for a better outcome,” she said.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
