This is America not Israel. You're are the same dual citizenry neocon mentality that of and Anti-American unpatriotic prick! ZIONISTS GO HOME!!!!!!!!!!!!! Fight your own fucking wars. Your kind have stolen enough technology and we given you plenty through the neocon infiltrators so-called good will.
excerpt George Washington's farewell address 1796 "Observe good faith and justice towards all nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all. Religion and morality enjoin this conduct; and can it be, that good policy does not equally enjoin it 7 It will be worthy of a free, enlightened, and at no distant period, a great nation, to give to mankind the magnanimous and too novel example of a people always guided by an exalted justice and benevolence. Who can doubt that, in the course of time and things, the fruits of such a plan would richly repay any temporary advantages which might be lost by a steady adherence to it ? Can it be that Providence has not connected the permanent felicity of a nation with its virtue ? The experiment, at least, is recommended by every sentiment which ennobles human nature. Alas! is it rendered impossible by its vices? In the execution of such a plan, nothing is more essential than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against particular nations, and passionate attachments for others, should be excluded; and that, in place of them, just and amicable feelings towards all should be cultivated. The nation which indulges towards another a habitual hatred or a habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. Antipathy in one nation against another disposes each more readily to offer insult and injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence, frequent collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody contests. The nation, prompted by ill-will and resentment, sometimes impels to war the government, contrary to the best calculations of policy. The government sometimes participates in the national propensity, and adopts through passion what reason would reject; at other times it makes the animosity of the nation subservient to projects of hostility instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes perhaps the liberty, of nations, has been the victim. So likewise, a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation. As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils 7 Such an attachment of a small or weak towards a great and powerful nation dooms the former to be the satellite of the latter. Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. But that jealousy to be useful must be impartial; else it becomes the instrument of the very influence to be avoided, instead of a defense against it. Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other. Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests. The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible. So far as we have already formed engagements, let them be fulfilled with perfect good faith. Here let us stop. Europe has a set of primary interests which to us have none; or a very remote relation. Hence she must be engaged in frequent controversies, the causes of which are essentially foreign to our concerns. Hence, therefore, it must be unwise in us to implicate ourselves by artificial ties in the ordinary vicissitudes of her politics, or the ordinary combinations and collisions of her friendships or enmities. Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people under an efficient government. the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel. Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground? Why, by interweaving our destiny with that of any part of Europe, entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of European ambition, rivalship, interest, humor or caprice? It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world; so far, I mean, as we are now at liberty to do it; for let me not be understood as capable of patronizing infidelity to existing engagements. I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. I repeat it, therefore, let those engagements be observed in their genuine sense. But, in my opinion, it is unnecessary and would be unwise to extend them. Taking care always to keep ourselves by suitable establishments on a respectable defensive posture, we may safely trust to temporary alliances for extraordinary emergencies. Harmony, liberal intercourse with all nations, are recommended by policy, humanity, and interest. But even our commercial policy should hold an equal and impartial hand; neither seeking nor granting exclusive favors or preferences; consulting the natural course of things; diffusing and diversifying by gentle means the streams of commerce, but forcing nothing; establishing (with powers so disposed, in order to give trade a stable course, to define the rights of our merchants, and to enable the government to support them) conventional rules of intercourse, the best that present circumstances and mutual opinion will permit, but temporary, and liable to be from time to time abandoned or varied, as experience and circumstances shall dictate; constantly keeping in view that it is folly in one nation to look for disinterested favors from another; that it must pay with a portion of its independence for whatever it may accept under that character; that, by such acceptance, it may place itself in the condition of having given equivalents for nominal favors, and yet of being reproached with ingratitude for not giving more. There can be no greater error than to expect or calculate upon real favors from nation to nation. It is an illusion, which experience must cure, which a just pride ought to discard. In offering to you, my countrymen, these counsels of an old and affectionate friend, I dare not hope they will make the strong and lasting impression I could wish; that they will control the usual current of the passions, or prevent our nation from running the course which has hitherto marked the destiny of nations. But, if I may even flatter myself that they may be productive of some partial benefit, some occasional good; that they may now and then recur to moderate the fury of party spirit, to warn against the mischiefs of foreign intrigue, to guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism; this hope will be a full recompense for the solicitude for your welfare, by which they have been dictated. <end Peace, Doc On Sep 22, 5:51 am, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: *Travis* > Date: 2008/9/19 > Subject: America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It. MUST READ! > > Dear Friends, > > Mark Steyn's book, that is excellently reviewed below by Paul Eidelberg, is > a quick read and very important. > > The McCain/Palin ticket is America's only choice unless we want the third > millenia to be dominated by Islam, an even darker age than the dark ages. > > A vote for Obama is a vote toward the phenomena that Bat Ye'Or calls * > Eurabia.* "Amerabia" would be an unmitigated disaster for the entire > world. We cannot afford the reduction in America's security that will come > when Obama eliminates missile defense spending and reduces spending on > intelligence and the military. > > The "War on Terror" simply cannot become a "criminal investigation;" our > enemies would make that devastatingly clear. > > - Linda from San Diego > > *Mark Steyn, "America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It" * > > Reviewed by Paul Eidelberg > > Internationally renowned journalist Mark Steyn is famous for his abrasive > yet delightful wit. One wonders, however, how a book subtitled *The End of > the World as We Know It* can make delightful reading. Perhaps because > Steyn's wit conveys "politically incorrect" truths obscured by timid and > shallow pundits. > > Like Oriana Fallaci, Steyn not only exposes Islamic imperialism, but also > the moral confusion or cowardice of western elites--think of George Bush and > Barack Obama--who cuddle up to Islam or obscure its bellicose and hateful > nature. Steyn quotes Bernard Lewis, the dean of Islamic scholars: > > "In 1940, we knew who we were, we knew who the enemy was, we knew the > dangers and the issues.... It is different today. We don't know who we are. > We don't know the issues, and we still do not understand the nature of the > enemy." > > *America Alone* is an urgently needed wake up call. Steyn warns America > about what is happening to its NATO allies: (1) An aging and declining > European population has necessitated the importation of foreign workers, > primarily Muslim Arabs from North Africa. (2) Since these Muslims refuse to > integrate, they constitute a hostile and prolific population that threatens > to inundate the Continent. (3) Europe is committing cultural > self-destruction not only because of its permissive immigration policies, > but also because of the multiculturalism and moral relativism that permeate > the mentality of Europe's ruling elites--its post-Christian policy-makers and > judges on the one hand, and post-modern academics and journalists on the > other. > > What makes America even more alone is that its allies disdain the country > that saved them twice from tyranny. > > America needs to understand, however, that its economic and political > survival depends very much on Europe, and Europe, Steyn warns, is > approaching the abyss as a result of its moral decline and low birthrate. > Unless this trend is reversed--and this will require heroic efforts--Europe > will be semi-Islamic within a generation. > > Steyn has made an extensive survey of European demography. For a nation to > maintain a stable population--no growth and no decline--it needs a fertility > rate of 2.1 live births per woman. Whereas America has a 2.1 fertility > rate, Europe, as whole*,* has a rate of only 1.38. Spain, with a 1.1 > fertility rate, is halving every generation. > > In the major urban centers of France, of those aged 20 and under, about 45 > percent are Muslim. France is self-destructing. So is Russia, the world's > largest country. With a 1.14 fertility rate, there may be only 50 million > Russians at the end of the century. Large chunks of Russia will slide into > the Islamic orbit. As Steyn puts it, Europe is "going out of business." > > Steyn also emphasizes that Europe's social democracies, with their > cradle-to-grave welfare programs, are going bankrupt. The welfare state, by > assuming all the responsibilities of adulthood--health care, child care, care > of the elderly--has effectively severed its citizens from humanity's primal > instincts, including self-preservation. As Europe gets older and more > childless, it has to import more foreign workers. This can only end in > Europe's economic collapse. > > Europe's Muslim population is not very productive, since a large percentage > of Muslims prefers to proliferate and live of welfare rather than work. To > make matters worse, Muslims predominate in European prisons despite > permissive judicial systems. > > Meanwhile, mosques and madrassas, thanks largely to Saudi money, are > flourishing. The cultural identity of European nations is evaporating. > > Although Muslims in general reject the customs and laws of their host > country, their votes are eagerly sought by European politicians. Moreover, > government officials, whether obtuse or afflicted with multiculturalism, > magnify Muslim power by failing to enforce monogamy laws. Since Muslims can > have four wives, their birthrate is seven times that of Europeans. Some > demographers say Europe will be dominated by Muslims in 20 years. Steyn > does not exaggerate when he says Europe is committing cultural suicide. > > Imagine French literature and culture: gone. German literature and culture: > gone. Russian literature and culture: gone. In the home of humanism, > humanism is dying. > > Steyn offers a shocking example of this decadence. In 2006, Spain's ruling > Socialist Party introduced a bill in parliament legislating that apes be > included in "the category of persons, and that they be given the moral and > legal protection that currently are only enjoyed by human beings." The > party's argument was that humans in Spain share about 98 percent of their > genes with chimpanzees, gorillas, and orangutans. No wonder Spain's > fertility rate is only 1.1. > > But how did the Spanish socialists gain power? Well, on March 11, 2004, > three days before the Spanish elections, a series of terrorist train > bombings in Madrid killed more than 250 people. On election day, the voters > tossed out the government that had been supporting the U.S. in Iraq and > handed it over to the Socialists. It was this new leftwing government that > introduced the bill to endow apes with the moral and legal rights of human > beings (*perhaps the result of the left's unqualified struggle for human > rights detached from obligations*.) > > Notice, however, that it was Muslim terrorists that brought this leftwing > government to power. > To illustrate the fact that Europe's burgeoning Muslim population does not > integrate, Steyn points out that the most popular baby boy's name in much of > Europe is Muhammad. (The Saudis are willing to pay *any* man $1,000 to > change his name to Muhammad.) Steyn boldly adds that if you are muslim, > "you can lie, cheat, steal, rape, and kill women and children, as long as > you are doing it for Allah and his victory over infidels." Islam thus > provides would-be criminals with a license to steal and kill. (The present > writer wonders:* how many felons become Muslims to cover their evil motives > and thereby minimize if not avoid punishment?*) > > What about England? Alas, the teaching of moral relativism during the past > few decades has enfeebled and corrupted English society. In fact, relativism > has metamorphosed into moral reversal: witness the anti-Israel reportage of > the BBC, where the Jewish victims of Arab terror appear as the villains*.* > > England's judicial system has also been tainted. The courts mollycoddle > Arab criminals and terrorists as "victims" of so-called "oppressive" > majorities. London has become a breeding ground for global jihad, thanks to > the permissiveness of the courts. > > And so America's NATO allies are fading away. In the UN General Assembly in > 2003, the members of the European Union voted against the U.S. position 54.5 > percent of the time. Finland's prime minister said in 2002 that "the > European Union must not take up arms at any occasion in order to defend its > own interests." America is indeed alone. > > Perhaps this is why Steyn repeatedly refers to 9/11 as if it were > exclusively an American concern. Few people grasp the full significance of > that fateful day. 9/11 was the greatest morale-booster of Islam in 1,000 > years. 9/11 restored the confidence of the Muslim world--a world burning > with envious hatred of the West. 9/11 showed ambitious Muslims that the > "Great Satan," despite its military superiority, is vulnerable and can be > conquered. By restoring the pride of Muslims everywhere, 9/11 heightened > Islam's ambition to conquer the world. It has already emasculated Europe. > > To stop Islam's forward march, Steyn offers various proposals, including the > following (to which I add parenthetic comments): > > ● Support women's rights--real rights, not feminism--in the Muslim world. > (Encourage the production of films to dramatize the plight of Muslim women. > This would also serve to enlighten Americans about Islamic barbarities such > as "honor killings.") > ● "Roll back Wahhabi, Iranian, and other ideological exports that have > radicalized Muslims on every continent." (I wonder, however, whether > sectarian differences in the Islamic world have any *strategic*significance.) > ● Cut off the Saudi funding of mosques, madrassas, think tanks, and other > Islamic organizations in America. (Islamic influence on American society may > also be exerted via retired, high-level American officials on the Saudi > payroll. Legislation may be required to terminate this pernicious state of > affairs.) > ● Marginalize the UN and ensure that Islamic states that persecute > non-Muslims are denied international legitimacy. (To this end, the U.S. > should demand the expulsion from the UN of any state that violates the UN > Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.) > ●Terminate the Iranian regime. (Needed is a "shock-and-awe" attack on > Iran's nuclear facilities.) > > But now I must say that something is missing in Steyn's *America Alone*, > namely, *Israel*. Yet Israel may contain the key to humbling Islam. > > Scholars have noted the overweening arrogance of Muslim Arabs. Washington > should therefore: > > ● Call upon Israel to devastate the entire Arab terrorist network west of > the Jordan River, including the Fatah- and Hamas-led Palestinian > Authority--now a proxy of Iran. > ● Declare that any attack on Israel will be deemed an attack on the United > States. > ● Move the American embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and urge Israel to > exercise its rightful authority over the Temple Mount. This is the > ideological key to terminating Islamic imperialism. > > *Of course, the U.S. may lack the will or leadership to roll back Islamic > imperialism. Steyn is not optimistic. All the more reason to urge > Americans, especially their decision-makers, to read America Alone and heed > its proposals, lest America succumb to the fate hovering over Europe. * > ** > *HAVE YOU READ IT YET? I HAVE -- AND STRONGLY ENDORSE IT!* > ** > *-- Allan*, Chapter Director > ACT For America. (NY & LI) > * > L A N . . A S T A S L E M > I will NOT submit to islam! > * > > __._,_.___ > Messages<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYW5...> > [image: Yahoo! > Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbnZxdHRmBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl...> > Change settings via the > Web<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJncDhpM2U...>(Yahoo! > ID required) > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily > Digest<[EMAIL PROTECTED]:+Digest>| > Switch > format to Traditional<[EMAIL PROTECTED]:+Traditional> > Visit Your Group > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport;_ylc=X3oDMTJldjlhczNnBF9T...>| > Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>| Unsubscribe > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Recent Activity > > - 4 > New > Members<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJnamFv...> > > Visit Your Group > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOWx0Y2M5BF9T...> > Yahoo! News > > Get it all > here<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13ohrpqmh/M=493064.12016309.12445701.8674...> > > Breaking news to > > entertainment news > Yahoo! Groups > > Find > balance<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13o1gadn2/M=493064.12016238.12823558.8674...> > > between nutrition, > > activity & well-being. > Family Photos > > Learn how to > best<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13olf7nor/M=493064.12717544.13024012.8674...> > > capture your > > family moments. > . > > __,_._,___ > > -- > *~@):~{> > > -- > *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
