In democracy the affected people have every right to demand what they think is correct.
e.g. gays/lesbian wishes to show up their male-male or female-female love in public. Option-A -------------- Let us assume that tomorrow a gay decides to run for President. They will be kissing their spouses in public. Millions of American kids will be watching this and get confused.. Option-B ------------- We allow them to do whatever they can do privately on mutual consent in their home. I believe the majority will view this as 'moral degradation' of society and confuse the kids. The point I was trying to make was: While world's powerful democracy has allowed gay marriage against the will of majority people, whose kids will be morally affected by watching the unnatural public display of 'gay-love making' , another democracy the liberal Government has apprised its stand to the court. Tomorrow (say in 22nd century) , if a human gets another unnatural behavioral disorder 'human-animal' etc. will they be allowed to marry.. Basically, in the name of freedom of choice, a wrong precedent has been set by CA courts. -MP On Sep 26, 7:09 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > manij, > > Yes, to some people homosexuality is immoral, to others it is not. Not > exactly a news flash. Is there some other point your trying to make? > > On Sep 26, 5:49 pm, MANOJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > All: > > > You might have noticed the reply of Iranian President in Larry King > > Live. > > So were the Conservatives right about ban on gay Marriage ? > > > -MP > > > -- > > Gay sex immoral, Centre tells Delhi HC > > Press Trust of India > > Friday, September 26, 2008, (New Delhi) > > Gay sex is immoral and a reflection of a pervasive mind and its > > decriminalisation would lead to moral degradation of society, the > > Centre on Friday told the Delhi High Court. > > > "Homosexuality is a social vice and the state has the power to contain > > it," the government contended. > > > "It (decriminalising homosexuality) may create breach of peace. If it > > were allowed, then evils of AIDS and HIV would further spread and harm > > the people. It would lead to big health hazard. It would degrade moral > > values of the society," Additional Solicitor General P P Malhotra > > contended. > > > The Centre's stand assumes significance in view of the contradictory > > stand taken by its two ministries, with the Home Ministry opposing > > decriminalisation of such acts while the Health Ministry favouring the > > scrapping of penal provisions which provide a punishment of up to life > > sentence for homosexual acts. > > > Appearing before a bench headed by Chief Justice A P Shah, the ASG > > said that it is crucial to hold such unnatural behaviour > > (homosexuality) as a criminal offence and its deletion would lead to > > moral degradation in the society. > > > Countering the contentions of the gay right activists, the government > > said that such behaviour is not a natural trait but a reflection of a > > perverse mind. > > > Citing a judgement of Orissa court, he said that such behaviour was > > because of perverse mind, which needed to be controlled. > > > However, the court was not satisfied with his contention saying that > > the order was passed 25 years ago and in that case a boy was sexually > > assaulted. > > > "We are concerned about homosexual acts among consenting adults in > > private so that judgement is not relevant here," the bench, also > > comprising Justice S Muralidhar said. > > > "Much water has flown under the bridge during last 25 years," the > > court observed. > > >http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080066818 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
