MANOJ, 1. The United States is not a Democracy, it is a Representative Republic.
2.What is the big tradegy about some kids being "confused' by seeing two men or women kissing in public? I was "confused" by long divison in the 2nd grade. I got over it. 3. We have bigger problems in this country to obsess over than gay marriage. On Sep 29, 10:27 am, MANOJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In democracy the affected people have every right to demand what they > think is correct. > > e.g. gays/lesbian wishes to show up their male-male or female-female > love in public. > > Option-A > -------------- > Let us assume that tomorrow a gay decides to run for President. > > They will be kissing their spouses in public. > > Millions of American kids will be watching this and get confused.. > > Option-B > ------------- > We allow them to do whatever they can do privately on mutual consent > in their home. > > I believe the majority will view this as 'moral degradation' of > society and confuse the kids. > > The point I was trying to make was: > > While world's powerful democracy has allowed gay marriage against the > will of majority people, whose kids will be morally affected by > watching the unnatural public display of 'gay-love making' , another > democracy the liberal Government has apprised its stand to the court. > > Tomorrow (say in 22nd century) , if a human gets another unnatural > behavioral disorder 'human-animal' etc. will they be allowed to > marry.. > > Basically, in the name of freedom of choice, a wrong precedent has > been set by CA courts. > > -MP > > On Sep 26, 7:09 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > manij, > > > Yes, to some people homosexuality is immoral, to others it is not. Not > > exactly a news flash. Is there some other point your trying to make? > > > On Sep 26, 5:49 pm, MANOJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > All: > > > > You might have noticed the reply of Iranian President in Larry King > > > Live. > > > So were the Conservatives right about ban on gay Marriage ? > > > > -MP > > > > -- > > > Gay sex immoral, Centre tells Delhi HC > > > Press Trust of India > > > Friday, September 26, 2008, (New Delhi) > > > Gay sex is immoral and a reflection of a pervasive mind and its > > > decriminalisation would lead to moral degradation of society, the > > > Centre on Friday told the Delhi High Court. > > > > "Homosexuality is a social vice and the state has the power to contain > > > it," the government contended. > > > > "It (decriminalising homosexuality) may create breach of peace. If it > > > were allowed, then evils of AIDS and HIV would further spread and harm > > > the people. It would lead to big health hazard. It would degrade moral > > > values of the society," Additional Solicitor General P P Malhotra > > > contended. > > > > The Centre's stand assumes significance in view of the contradictory > > > stand taken by its two ministries, with the Home Ministry opposing > > > decriminalisation of such acts while the Health Ministry favouring the > > > scrapping of penal provisions which provide a punishment of up to life > > > sentence for homosexual acts. > > > > Appearing before a bench headed by Chief Justice A P Shah, the ASG > > > said that it is crucial to hold such unnatural behaviour > > > (homosexuality) as a criminal offence and its deletion would lead to > > > moral degradation in the society. > > > > Countering the contentions of the gay right activists, the government > > > said that such behaviour is not a natural trait but a reflection of a > > > perverse mind. > > > > Citing a judgement of Orissa court, he said that such behaviour was > > > because of perverse mind, which needed to be controlled. > > > > However, the court was not satisfied with his contention saying that > > > the order was passed 25 years ago and in that case a boy was sexually > > > assaulted. > > > > "We are concerned about homosexual acts among consenting adults in > > > private so that judgement is not relevant here," the bench, also > > > comprising Justice S Muralidhar said. > > > > "Much water has flown under the bridge during last 25 years," the > > > court observed. > > > >http://www.ndtv.com/convergence/ndtv/story.aspx?id=NEWEN20080066818- Hide > > >quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
