http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDZiMjkwMDczZWI5ODdjOWYxZTIzZGIyNzEyMjE0ODI=

By their fruits ye shall know them.

By Stanley Kurtz

What if Barack Obama’s most important radical connection has been
hiding in plain sight all along? Obama has had an intimate and long-
term association with the Association of Community Organizations for
Reform Now (Acorn), the largest radical group in America. If I told
you Obama had close ties with MoveOn.org or Code Pink, you’d know what
I was talking about. Acorn is at least as radical as these better-
known groups, arguably more so. Yet because Acorn works locally, in
carefully selected urban areas, its national profile is lower. Acorn
likes it that way. And so, I’d wager, does Barack Obama.

This is a story we’ve largely missed. While Obama’s Acorn connection
has not gone entirely unreported, its depth, extent, and significance
have been poorly understood. Typically, media background pieces note
that, on behalf of Acorn, Obama and a team of Chicago attorneys won a
1995 suit forcing the state of Illinois to implement the federal
“motor-voter” bill. In fact, Obama’s Acorn connection is far more
extensive. In the few stories where Obama’s role as an Acorn
“leadership trainer” is noted, or his seats on the boards of
foundations that may have supported Acorn are discussed, there is
little follow-up. Even these more extensive reports miss many aspects
of Obama’s ties to Acorn.

An Anti-Capitalism Agenda
To understand the nature and extent of Acorn’s radicalism, an
excellent place to begin is Sol Stern’s 2003 City Journal article,
“ACORN’s Nutty Regime for Cities.” (For a shorter but helpful piece,
try Steven Malanga’s “Acorn Squash.”)

Sol Stern explains that Acorn is the key modern successor of the
radical 1960’s “New Left,” with a “1960’s-bred agenda of anti-
capitalism” to match. Acorn, says Stern, grew out of “one of the New
Left’s silliest and most destructive groups, the National Welfare
Rights Organization.” In the 1960’s, NWRO launched a campaign of sit-
ins and disruptions at welfare offices. The goal was to remove
eligibility restrictions, and thus effectively flood welfare rolls
with so many clients that the system would burst. The theory, explains
Stern, was that an impossibly overburdened welfare system would force
“a radical reconstruction of America’s unjust capitalist economy.”
Instead of a socialist utopia, however, we got the culture of
dependency and family breakdown that ate away at America’s inner
cities — until welfare reform began to turn the tide.

While Acorn holds to NWRO’s radical economic framework and its
confrontational 1960’s-style tactics, the targets and strategy have
changed. Acorn prefers to fly under the national radar, organizing
locally in liberal urban areas — where, Stern observes, local
legislators and reporters are often “slow to grasp how radical Acorn’s
positions really are.” Acorn’s new goals are municipal “living wage”
laws targeting “big-box” stores like Wal-Mart, rolling back welfare
reform, and regulating banks — efforts styled as combating “predatory
lending.” Unfortunately, instead of helping workers, Acorn’s living-
wage campaigns drive businesses out of the very neighborhoods where
jobs are needed most. Acorn’s opposition to welfare reform only
threatens to worsen the self-reinforcing cycle of urban poverty and
family breakdown. Perhaps most mischievously, says Stern, Acorn uses
banking regulations to pressure financial institutions into massive
“donations” that it uses to finance supposedly non-partisan voter turn-
out drives.

According to Stern, Acorn’s radical agenda sometimes shifts toward
“undisguised authoritarian socialism.” Fully aware of its living-wage
campaign’s tendency to drive businesses out of cities, Acorn hopes to
force companies that want to move to obtain “exit visas.” “How much
longer before Acorn calls for exit visas for wealthy or middle-class
individuals before they can leave a city?” asks Stern, adding, “This
is the road to serfdom indeed.”

In Your Face
Acorn’s tactics are famously “in your face.” Just think of Code Pink’s
well-known operations (threatening to occupy congressional offices,
interrupting the testimony of General David Petraeus) and you’ll get
the idea. Acorn protesters have disrupted Federal Reserve hearings,
but mostly deploy their aggressive tactics locally. Chicago is home to
one of its strongest chapters, and Acorn has burst into a closed city
council meeting there. Acorn protestors in Baltimore disrupted a
bankers’ dinner and sent four busloads of profanity-screaming
protestors against the mayor’s home, terrifying his wife and kids.
Even a Baltimore city council member who generally supports Acorn said
their intimidation tactics had crossed the line.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to