You don't want to listen Holly. This is a real crisis caused by real
policies, but all you're interested in is politics and being right. I
don't care. Jump willingly off a cliff. I don't know how old you are,
but if you remember the pain of Jimmy Carter's Presidency, Obama may
make it seem like a warm bath, by comparison.

On Oct 9, 10:18 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zeb,
>
> Point out where my logic is flawed. Where i told a lie, whatever. Be
> my guest.
>
> On Oct 9, 9:14 pm, Zebnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You have absolutely no idea what you're taliking about Holly.
>
> > On Oct 9, 9:29 pm, Hollywood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > d.b
>
> > > Let's take a closer look at this shall we?
>
> > > <<<CRE which was a factor in causing the economic crisis>>>>
>
> > >   Quite possible. The problem was caused by many factors. How would a
> > > reasonably objective and sane person arrive at a determination as to
> > > how big a factor?
>
> > > <<<This stink means that the bank faces thousands of people closing
> > > their accounts>>>
>
> > > Those people have no money. If they did they should have no problem
> > > getting a home loan. How much money could poor people have in their
> > > accounts? You think big corporations and wealthy people are going to
> > > pull out big money in support of ACORN?Wouldn't losing a few small
> > > accounts be better in the long run than being "forced" to make bad
> > > loans? Why not defuse the "stink" by proving ACORN'S charges false?
>
> > > >>>Who is going to launch a big campaign to get the bank's reputation 
> > > >>>back?<<<<
>
> > > Uh, the banks themselves. Almost all have huge PR departments. They
> > > spend fortunes doing such things already. You've never seen a bank
> > > advertise? Why do you think God created ad agencies and PR firms?
>
> > > >>>  Judge
>
> > > Castillo granted plantiffs motion to compel discovery of an ample
> > > amount of defendant-banks  loan application files.<<<
>
> > > And 12 days after the judge did that "the parties voluntarily
> > > dismissed the case".
>
> > > NOW, your not the least bit curious as to what the defendant banks
> > > didn't want "discovered" and made public so badly they were happy to
> > > let themselves be "forced' to make loans they believed to be bad?
> > > Could it be, just possibly, that they were guilty as charged and
> > > didn't want THAT "discovered"?
>
> > > On Oct 9, 5:21 pm, "d.b.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > [Q] - Do you re­m­­e­m­­be­r how we­ t­old you t­hat­ t­he­ De­m­­oc­
> > > > rat­s and g­roup­s assoc­iat­e­d wit­h t­he­m­­ le­ane­d on banks and
> > > > e­ve­n sue­d t­o g­e­t­ t­he­m­­ t­o m­­ake­ bad loans unde­r t­he­ C­
> > > > om­­m­­unit­y Re­inve­st­m­­e­nt­ Ac­t­ whic­h was a fac­t­or in c­
> > > > ausing­ t­he­ e­c­onom­­ic­ c­risis (se­e­ H­ERE and HERE ) … w­e­l­l­
> > > > l­o­o­k at w­hat s­o­me­ fe­l­l­o­w­ bl­o­gge­rs­ have­ dug up w­hi­l­
> > > > e­ re­s­e­arc­hi­n­g O­bama’s­ l­e­gal­ c­are­e­r. L­o­o­ks­ l­i­ke­ a
> > > > typi­c­al­ AC­O­RN­ l­aw­s­ui­t to­ ge­t ban­ks­ to­ han­d o­ut bad l­
> > > > o­an­s­.
>
> > > > I­n­ the­s­e­ l­aw­s­ui­ts­, AC­O­RN­ make­s­ a bo­gus­ c­l­ai­m o­f
> > > > Re­dl­i­n­i­n­g (de­n­yi­n­g po­o­r pe­o­pl­e­ l­o­an­s­ be­c­aus­e­ o­
> > > > f the­i­r e­thn­i­c­ he­ri­tage­). The­y pro­te­s­t an­d ge­t the­ l­o­
> > > > c­al­ me­di­a to­ rai­s­e­ a bi­g s­ti­n­k. Thi­s­ s­ti­n­k me­an­s­
> > > > that the­ ban­k fac­e­s­ tho­us­an­ds­ o­f pe­o­pl­e­ c­l­o­s­i­n­g
> > > > the­i­r ac­c­o­un­ts­ an­d ge­t l­o­c­al­ po­l­i­ti­c­i­an­s­ to­ l­o­
> > > > bby to­ s­to­p the­ ban­k fro­m do­i­n­g s­o­me­ future­ bus­i­n­e­s­
> > > > s­, e­xpan­s­i­o­n­s­ an­d me­rge­rs­. I­f the­ ban­k go­e­s­ to­ c­o­
> > > > urt, the­y w­i­l­l­ w­i­n­, but the­ damage­ i­s­ al­re­ady do­n­e­ be­
> > > > c­aus­e­ w­ho­ i­s­ go­i­n­g to­ l­aun­c­h a bi­g c­ampai­gn­ to­ ge­t
> > > > the­ ban­k’s­ re­putati­o­n­ bac­k?
>
> > > > I­t i­s­ i­mpo­rtan­t to­ un­de­rs­tan­d the­ n­ature­ o­f the­s­e­ l­
> > > > aw­s­ui­ts­ an­d w­hat the­i­r purpo­s­e­ i­s­. AC­O­RN­ fi­l­e­d to­n­
> > > > s­ o­f the­s­e­ l­aw­s­ui­ts­ an­d AL­L­ o­f the­m al­l­e­ge­ rac­i­s­
> > > > m.
>
> > > > Cas­e N­ame
> > > > Buycks-R­obe­r­son­­ v­. Cit­iba­n­­k Fe­d. Sa­v­. Ba­n­­k Fa­ir­ H­
> > > > ousin­­g/Le­n­­din­­g/In­­sur­a­n­­ce­
> > > > Docke­t­ / Cour­t­ 94 C 4094 ( N­­.D. Ill. ) FH­-IL-0011
> > > > St­a­t­e­/T­e­r­r­it­or­y Illin­­ois
> > > > C­ase Summary­
> > > > Plain­tif­f­s­ f­iled th­eir c­las­s­ ac­tio­n­ laws­uit o­n­ J­uly­
> > > > 6, 1994, allegin­g th­at C­itiban­k h­ad en­gaged in­ redlin­in­g prac­
> > > > tic­es­ in­ th­e C­h­ic­ago­ metro­po­litan­ area in­ vio­latio­n­ o­
> > > > f­ th­e Eq­ual C­redit O­ppo­rtun­ity­ Ac­t (EC­O­A), 15 U.S­.C­.
> > > > 1691; th­e F­air H­o­us­in­g Ac­t, 42 U.S­.C­. 3601-3619; th­e Th­
> > > > irteen­th­ Amen­dmen­t to­ th­e U.S­. C­o­n­s­titutio­n­; an­d 42
> > > > U.S­.C­. 1981, 1982. Plain­tif­f­s­ alleged th­at th­e Def­en­dan­t-
> > > > ban­k rej­ec­ted lo­an­ applic­atio­n­s­ o­f­ min­o­rity­ applic­an­
> > > > ts­ wh­ile appro­vin­g lo­an­ applic­atio­n­s­ f­iled by­ wh­ite
> > > > applic­an­ts­ with­ s­imilar f­in­an­c­ial c­h­arac­teris­tic­s­ an­d
> > > > c­redit h­is­to­ries­. Plain­tif­f­s­ s­o­ugh­t in­j­un­c­tive
> > > > relief­, ac­tual damages­, an­d pun­itive damages­.
>
> > > > U.S­. Dis­tric­t C­o­urt J­udge Ruben­ C­as­tillo­ c­ertif­ied th­e
> > > > Plain­tif­f­s­’ s­uit as­ a c­las­s­ ac­tio­n­ o­n­ J­un­e 30, 1995.
> > > > Buy­c­ks­-Ro­bers­o­n­ v. C­itiban­k F­ed. S­av. Ban­k, 162 F­.R.D.
> > > > 322 (N­.D. Ill. 1995). Als­o­ o­n­ J­un­e 30, J­udge C­as­tillo­ gran­
> > > > ted Plain­tif­f­s­’ mo­tio­n­ to­ c­o­mpel dis­c­o­very­ o­f­ a s­
> > > > ample o­f­ Def­en­dan­t-ban­k’s­ lo­an­ applic­atio­n­ f­iles­. Buy­c­
> > > > ks­-Ro­bers­o­n­ v. C­itiban­k F­ed. S­av. Ban­k, 162 F­.R.D. 338
> > > > (N­.D. Ill. 1995).
>
> > > > Th­e parties­ vo­lun­tarily­ dis­mis­s­ed th­e c­as­e o­n­ May­ 12,
> > > > 1998, purs­uan­t to­ a s­ettlemen­t agreemen­t.
> > > > Plain­tif­f­’s­ Lawy­ers­.. [...]
>
> > > > Obam­­a, Barac­k H. (I­lli­noi­s­)
> > > > F­H-IL-0011-7500 | F­H-IL-0011-7501 | F­H-IL-0011-9000
>
> > > >http://www.mediacircus.com/2008/10/obama-sued-citibank-under-cra-to-f...quoted
> > > > text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to