How long have you been "with" the United Way?

Obama WORKED for ACORN, as a Lawyer, that SUED CitiBank, to get them
to give these risky Loans that have us in a Financial disaster right
now.  He has had a relationship with them, of some sort or another,
for going on 2 decades...  His ACTIONS need to be accounted for, for
most people...

I guess not for other's.


On Oct 16, 6:26 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Money comes out of my paycheck each payday to go to the United Way,
> but let me assure you that I don't support every single thing they do.
> There are exceptions. Supporting an organization doesn't mean that you
> have knowledge of or adhere to every single thing that goes on.
>
> On Oct 16, 9:05 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > He backs the entity doing it...
>
> > Your actions MEAN something, just as your words do.
>
> > He doesn't get to work for them, back them with Financing, and then
> > ignore their Fraud.
>
> > It may be ok with you that he does such things, but I have Faith that
> > it is not ok with people who understand what he has done and what he
> > will likely do...
>
> > On Oct 16, 4:09 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Do you have proof he directly endorsed voter fraud?
>
> > > On Oct 16, 7:02 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > He supports them, one would think you support those you endorse, no?
>
> > > > On Oct 16, 3:57 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > Do you have proof he directly endorsed voter fraud?
>
> > > > > On Oct 16, 6:53 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > He's a smart man...
>
> > > > > > He knows what the Voter fraud he endorses has done to the Polls.
>
> > > > > > On Oct 16, 3:51 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > I don't put too much stock in polls, and it seems Obama isn't 
> > > > > > > either.
> > > > > > > He is cautioning his supporters against acting as if he has 
> > > > > > > already
> > > > > > > won.
>
> > > > > > > On Oct 14, 9:07 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Still nothing...
>
> > > > > > > > I guess we are all just going to wake up to a big surprise 
> > > > > > > > November
> > > > > > > > 5th, as the Election goes nothing like the Poll's, and the Loony
> > > > > > > > Liberals are all going to cry foul instead of learning why 
> > > > > > > > there was
> > > > > > > > such a huge discrepancy.
>
> > > > > > > > On Oct 13, 12:22 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > I have now only seen ONE MSM person mention this...
>
> > > > > > > > > On Oct 11, 8:17 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > What interests me, is how no one is bringing this up...
>
> > > > > > > > > > The Polling done is weighted according to the numbers 
> > > > > > > > > > provided by
> > > > > > > > > > these Election Boards and the "numbers" being signed up for 
> > > > > > > > > > either
> > > > > > > > > > Party, and then we find the Democrats have been lying, and 
> > > > > > > > > > no one
> > > > > > > > > > wants to revisit the numbers used to generate the Polling 
> > > > > > > > > > Data?
>
> > > > > > > > > > Why is that you suppose?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to