gaar, Do you not understand the question? Do you have proof Sen. Obamo DIRECTLY ENDORSED voter fraud? Yes or no.
On Oct 16, 8:05 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > He backs the entity doing it... > > Your actions MEAN something, just as your words do. > > He doesn't get to work for them, back them with Financing, and then > ignore their Fraud. > > It may be ok with you that he does such things, but I have Faith that > it is not ok with people who understand what he has done and what he > will likely do... > > On Oct 16, 4:09 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Do you have proof he directly endorsed voter fraud? > > > On Oct 16, 7:02 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > He supports them, one would think you support those you endorse, no? > > > > On Oct 16, 3:57 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Do you have proof he directly endorsed voter fraud? > > > > > On Oct 16, 6:53 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > He's a smart man... > > > > > > He knows what the Voter fraud he endorses has done to the Polls. > > > > > > On Oct 16, 3:51 pm, wncs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > I don't put too much stock in polls, and it seems Obama isn't > > > > > > either. > > > > > > He is cautioning his supporters against acting as if he has already > > > > > > won. > > > > > > > On Oct 14, 9:07 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Still nothing... > > > > > > > > I guess we are all just going to wake up to a big surprise > > > > > > > November > > > > > > > 5th, as the Election goes nothing like the Poll's, and the Loony > > > > > > > Liberals are all going to cry foul instead of learning why there > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > such a huge discrepancy. > > > > > > > > On Oct 13, 12:22 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > I have now only seen ONE MSM person mention this... > > > > > > > > > On Oct 11, 8:17 pm, Gaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > What interests me, is how no one is bringing this up... > > > > > > > > > > The Polling done is weighted according to the numbers > > > > > > > > > provided by > > > > > > > > > these Election Boards and the "numbers" being signed up for > > > > > > > > > either > > > > > > > > > Party, and then we find the Democrats have been lying, and no > > > > > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > wants to revisit the numbers used to generate the Polling > > > > > > > > > Data? > > > > > > > > > > Why is that you suppose?- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
