US Republicans target ACORN: the great “voter fraud” fraud
By Tom Eley
18 October 2008

A community activist group called ACORN (Association of Community
Organizations for Reform Now) has become a lighting rod for Republican
attacks as the US presidential election approaches.

In Wednesday night’s presidential debate, John McCain warned that
ACORN “is now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest
frauds in voter history in this country, maybe destroying the fabric
of democracy.” He demanded to “know the full extent of Senator Obama’s
relationship” to this purportedly criminal organization.

In a recent fundraising email, vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin
warned that “far-left groups in this country will do anything to help
the Obama-Biden Democrats win the White House and maintain their
majorities in Congress. The left-wing activist group, ACORN, is now
under investigation for voter registration fraud in a number of
battleground states.... We can’t allow leftist groups like ACORN to
steal this election.”

ACORN is now at the center of a media controversy fueled by Republican
accusations. The FBI has announced an investigation, as have a number
of states, counties and municipalities.

What is this group that is allegedly responsible for “destroying the
fabric of democracy”?

ACORN describes itself as an organization of “low- and moderate-income
people with over 400,000 member families” which focuses on such goals
as raising the minimum wage and expanding access to affordable
housing. It unreservedly supports the Democratic Party and has
endorsed Barack Obama for the presidency. In the lead-up to the 2008
election, ACORN has launched a major voter registration campaign to
bring poor and minority people—who tend to vote Democratic—to the
polls in the upcoming election. It claims to have registered over 1.3
million voters, largely in critical “battleground” states.

There is no evidence that ACORN has committed fraud, a charge that
implies intent. As is typical of registration and petition drives,
ACORN has hired low-paid workers to carry out registrations. Some of
these workers, in an effort to take home more pay, have invented the
names of registrants. However, ACORN claims that it examines all
registration material and flags forgeries in an attempt to assist
state officials in prosecuting cases of fraud. In fact, ACORN claims
that Republican officials have used the same registration cards ACORN
has flagged for attention as a means of discrediting the group’s
operations.

In any event, the Republicans have yet to explain the mechanics of how
the supposedly false voting cards would actually result in thousands
of false votes. The hue and cry over finding names like “Mickey Mouse”
on a registration form begs the question: How could anyone cast a
ballot under such a name? If the voters are fictional, as the
Republicans claim, presumably they will not show up at the polls.

The Republican charge of “voter fraud” is itself a fraud. Through
sensational accusations the Republicans hope to resuscitate their
faltering presidential and Congressional campaigns. These charges
could also be used to cast doubt over the legitimacy of the electoral
outcome.

More fundamentally, however, the aim is to suppress the vote among
sections of the working class and youth in an attempt to manipulate
the outcome of the election. This is the real “voter fraud”—and there
is a history to it.

The current charges against ACORN are only the latest chapter in this
right-wing campaign to suppress voting rights. The campaign to
restrict the franchise, found its most anti-democratic expression in
the US Supreme Court’s intervention in the 2000 presidential election
to hand victory to Bush by means of invalidating legally cast ballots,
ruling that there was no inherent right among citizens to vote for the
president. (Purchase online: “The Crisis of American Democracy: The
Presidential Elections of 2000 and 2004”).

Since 2000, the Republican Party has taken steps to impede the vote
not seen since the days of the Jim Crow voting restrictions targeting
blacks in the South. Republican strategists sense that as the most
rapidly growing sections of the electorate—youth, minorities,
naturalized immigrants, and workers—punish their candidates at the
polls, survival will depend on limiting these groups’ access to the
ballot.

On October 9, the New York Times ran an exposé revealing that tens of
thousands of voters in the “swing states” that will ultimately decide
the presidential election had been purged from the election rolls,
perhaps illegally.

In Ohio, the Republican Party sued the secretary of state in an effort
to toss out the names of 200,000 legally registered voters for
discrepancies—most likely clerical errors—in their registration data.
On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that the Republican Party did not
have the right to bring the case.

In other states, new restrictions on the right to vote are aimed at
those whose homes have been foreclosed and those who lack photo
identification, such as drivers’ licenses.

The mainstream media conveniently forgets that the US attorneys
scandal that led to the resignation of Attorney General Alberto
Gonzales also arose from a Republican attempt to suppress the vote. A
number of the attorneys were sacked because they did not comply with
Republican pressure to expedite the prosecution of voter fraud cases,
so that they would take place before the 2006 elections. For example,
the US Department of Justice has found that US Attorney David Iglesias
was dismissed for failing to investigate a local ACORN chapter in New
Mexico. (See “Special prosecutor appointed to investigate US attorney
firings”)

More craven than the Republican attacks on ACORN has been the cowardly
response of Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. In response to
McCain’s attack on ACORN, Obama disowned any relationship to the
organization, which has worked feverishly on his behalf for months.
Moments earlier he had disowned Bill Ayers, the former radical
routinely condemned by Republicans as a terrorist. (See “In defense of
Bill Ayers”) Shortly afterward he listed those he considers his true
associates. These include the world’s richest man, Warren Buffett, and
former Federal Reserve Board head Paul Volcker, whose high interest
rate “shock therapy” in 1979 was responsible for devastating many of
the communities where ACORN now seeks to register impoverished voters.

The Democrats are not opposed to voter suppression in either principle
or practice. They engage in it when it suits their purposes, regularly
purging the nominating petitions of left-wing, and especially
socialist, opponents. Barack Obama’s benefactors in the Illinois state
Democratic Party have twice attempted to invalidate thousands of
signatures of registered voters from third party nominating petitions
in order to remove Socialist Equality Party legislative candidates
from the ballot—Tom Mackaman (in 2004) and Joe Parnarauskis (in 2006).
Obama personally came to Danville, Illinois, to campaign against
Parnarauskis. (See “Democrats conspire against voters in bid to remove
SEP from ballot” and “Judge orders election board to certify Illinois
SEP candidate”).

The notion, pedaled by the Republicans—that the great threat to
American democracy is that ineligible voters might somehow cast ballots
—is absurd. The US is a country where only half of the eligible
population votes and where the great majority of the electorate is
politically disenfranchised by the two-party duopoly of big business.

In fact, the greatest threat “to the fabric of democracy” is the
capitalist class, which cannot maintain democratic norms under
conditions of growing social inequality in which the vast majority of
the population is increasingly impoverished.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to