It's sad that some poor old maid shat out this boob and had to admit it. Especially since he isn't even intelligent enough to create any new material.
On Thursday, December 19, 2013, Mark Carpenter wrote: > Al: > > And now you know why so many of us have written off the Subjectivists and > the Ayn Randers as inflexible, authoritarian ideologues. > > You've read stuff by their spokesperson, Bruce Majors. Some of them don't > have Bruce's "gift" of creative scatological profanity and blatant > obscenity, but they're still cut from Ayn Rand's sociopathic mold. > > Mark > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> > Sent from my iPhone > > ^__^ > { . . } > \_~_/ > > On Dec 19, 2013, at 2:41 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > Lol. > You've didn't respond to key aspects of what I said. > You either didn't understand them, and/or understood them and avoided > them. > Either or both ways it leaves no room for further conversation on the > subject. > So how's the weather where you are? > :-) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Wynman <[email protected]> > Sent: Wed, Dec 18, 2013 6:39 pm > Subject: Al on the US FOUNDED AS A STATELESS SOCIETY!!?! > > *That’s a terrific question, Al! Thank you for thinking it up & > bringing it up for discussion.* > > *What happen after the Colonists declared their independence from the > coercive State that was England, knowing no alternative for operating their > society, they rather quickly created a new coercive State to rule them. > Yes, they were brilliant, well educate, mostly well-intentioned men of > integrity.* > > *But they lacked the tools built in the last 200+ years. They did not > have access to the work of Nock, Thoreau, LeFevre, Galambos, Rand, > Rothbard, Snelson, Riness, Molyneux, etc.. If those thinkers & the rest > who’ve built the liter of the Stateless society had been a couple centuries > earlier, our founders would NOT have created the monster to which they gave > birth … and after ten generations in a free society, people today would not > be able to imagine a society of willing-slaves like ours clamoring for ever > more State theft and “free” stuff. --bob* > > *Re: “*"All men are created equal", Bob-- but they never stay that way. > Expecting them to stay equally voluntary is a pipe dream. *”* > > *--EXACTLY, Al. In a free society we all have an equal opportunity to > become as unequal as possible, which is precisely in line with human > nature. ‘tis the utopian socialist/collectivist/Statist systems that force > “equality of result” on everyone … at the expense of your most successful > neighbors. –bob* > > *In a free society, Al, the consumers are always the “bosses of > business”. The only way producers can succeed in a free society is by > providing the highest quality goods/service at the lowest possible price. – > bob* > > *RE: “*the process of being "employed"-- which is synonymous with being > "used", ya know*”??!?* > > *--Al, I’m surprised you’d use that crappy bit of Marxist pseudo-thought. > In a free society, if you feel you’re being “used” & don’t like it, you > exit that relationship. * > > > * The State is only the “servant” of politicians/thugs who run it. * > > *-- bob * > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 18, 2013 2:03 PM > > *Subject:* Re: PosterGuy o0n Dispute Resolution in the Voluntary Society > > Ummm. . . > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
