good article. I don't often say thanks... but thanks, Travis.

On Monday, January 6, 2014 3:02:43 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
>
> *From:* Bob <javascript:>
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 05, 2013 2:51 PM
>
> *Subject:* What will you do?
>
>  
>
> I wish I could write like this. In one hundred years, I could not come up 
> with a better statement about how we should all feel about the constitution 
> and the subject of gun control. If the constitution is violated here, it 
> will be over for all our freedoms. This is a place where "We the People" 
> need to draw a line and it starts with one person at a time.
>
>  
>
> This is a rather long read.  I dare you to read a few paragraphs and not 
> read the rest. People are getting very serious about this problem.
>
>  
>
> Bob
>
>  
>
> *Dean Garrison (born 1955) is a contemporary American author and crime 
> fiction novelist. He was born in Michigan , grew up in the Indiana , 
> Illinois , and Texas , and received his B.A. degree from Ferris State 
> University in Big Rapids, Michigan . Garrison is a Crime Scene Technician 
> in West Michigan . His research in the fields of crime scene investigation 
> and Shooting Reconstruction are widely published in forensic journals under 
> the name "D.H. Garrison, Jr."*
>
>
>
>
> *If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *I feel a tremendous responsibility to write this article though I am a 
> little apprehensive. Thinking about the possibility of rising up against 
> our own government is a frightening thing for many of us. I am not Johnny 
> Rambo and I will be the first to admit that I do not want to die. The 
> reason I feel compelled to write this, however, is simply because I don’t 
> think the average American is equipped with the facts. I feel that a lot of 
> American citizens feel like they have no choice but to surrender their guns 
> if the government comes for them. I blame traditional media sources for 
> this mass brainwash and I carry the responsibility of all small independent 
> bloggers to tell the truth. So my focus today is to lay out your 
> constitutional rights as an American, and let you decide what to do with 
> those rights. About a month ago I let the “democracy” word slip in a 
> discussion with a fellow blogger. I know better. Americans have been 
> conditioned to use this term. It’s not an accurate term and it never has 
> been a correct term to describe our form of government. The truth is that 
> the United States of America is a constitutional republic. This is similar 
> to a democracy because our representatives are selected by democratic 
> elections, but ultimately our representatives are required to work within 
> the framework of our constitution. In other words, even if 90% of Americans 
> want something that goes against our founding principles, they have no 
> right to call for a violation of constitutional rights. If you are 
> religious you might choose to think of it this way… Say that members of 
> your congregation decide that mass fornication is a good thing. Do they 
> have the right to change the teachings of your God? The truth is the truth. 
> It doesn’t matter how many people try to stray from it. Did I just compare 
> our founders to God? In a way I did, but please note that I am not trying 
> to insult anyone. For the purpose of the American Government our 
> constitution and founders who wrote it are much like God is to believers. 
> It is the law. It is indisputable. Our founders did not want a “democracy” 
> for they feared a true democracy was just as dangerous as a monarchy. The 
> founders were highly educated people who were experienced in defending 
> themselves against tyranny. They understood that the constitution could 
> protect the people by limiting the power of anyone to work outside of it 
> much better than a pure system of popularity. A system of checks and 
> balances was set up to help limit corruption of government and also the 
> potential for an “immoral majority” developing within the American People. 
> We have forgotten in this country that we are ultimately ruled by a 
> constitution. Why is a democracy potentially just as dangerous as a 
> monarchy? Let’s look at something that Benjamin Franklin said because it 
> answers that question more fully and succinctly than I can.Democracy is two 
> wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed 
> lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin Even 230+ years ago our 
> founders were perceptive enough to realize that democracy was a dangerous 
> form of government. How so? Because the citizens of a country can become 
> just as corrupt as any government. We have seen evidence of this throughout 
> history. Ask Native Americans and African-Americans if this population can 
> become corrupt. I think in 2012 we are seeing evidence of whatFranklin was 
> trying to tell us. Just because a majority of people may support certain 
> ideas it does not mean that those ideas are just. In simple terms, just 
> because most Americans love our president and voted for him, it does not 
> mean that he has the power to go against our constitutional rights. Next I’ 
> would like to review the text of the second amendment. It is very clear. 
> This is the law of this land. So when Senator Feinstein or President Obama 
> talk about taking your guns, you need to think about something. Are they 
> honoring their sworn oath to uphold the constitution? "A well regulated 
> Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State , the right of the 
> people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".This is a pretty 
> clear statement. The fact is that it took 232 years for the Supreme Court 
> to even rule on this amendment because it has never been successfully 
> challenged. In 2008 a case of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled 
> that a handgun ban in Washington D.C. was unconstitutional. One also has to 
> take this into consideration. The Supreme Court supports your right to own 
> guns. If you want to research this decision further you can start here. For 
> those who try to debate the spirit of the 2nd amendment, they are truly no 
> different from people who will try to take Biblical quotes out of context 
> to try to support their immoral decisions. The founders were very clear on 
> the intent of the 2nd amendment. Let me share a few quick quotes here: The 
> strongest reason for people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, 
> as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. 
> -Thomas JeffersonFirearms stand next in importance to the Constitution 
> itself. They are the American people’s liberty teeth and keystone under 
> independence … "From the hour the Pilgrims landed, to the present day, 
> events, occurrences, and tendencies prove that to insure peace, security 
> and happiness, the rifle and pistol are equally indispensable . . . the 
> very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference – they 
> deserve a place of honor with all that is good". -George Washington The 
> Constitution shall never be construed "….to prevent the people of the 
> United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms". 
> -Samuel AdamsI could find hundreds of quotes like these. This country was 
> built on the right to bear arms. It was built on the rights of an 
> individual to bear arms, regardless of what his government or neighbor 
> happened to think. This is crystal clear. Ironically the people who voice 
> their opinions against this right have their free speech protected by your 
> guns. Without guns in this country, all other amendments become null and 
> void, simply because “We the People” will lose our power of enforcement. We 
> need to keep this in mind as our “representatives” try to push gun bans. I 
> don’t care if 99% of people are in support of gun bans (which is far from 
> the case), it is a violation of our constitutional rights, plain and 
> simple. A constitutional republic protects the rights of the individual 
> even when their ideas are very much in the minority. If I were the only 
> person in America who believed in the 2nd amendment, I would still be 
> within my rights to call upon it. You would all think I was insane and 
> possibly celebrate if I was gunned down, but in the end I would be the only 
> true American among us. Our framers were very clear on this. If my 
> government comes to take my guns, they are violating one of my 
> constitutional rights that is covered by the 2nd amendment.It is not my 
> right, at that point, but my responsibility to respond in the name of 
> liberty. What I am telling you is something that many are trying to soft 
> sell, and many others have tried to avoid putting into print, but I am 
> going to say it. The time for speaking in code is over. If they come for 
> our guns then it is our constitutional right to put them six feet under. 
> You have the right to kill any representative of this government who tries 
> to tread on your liberty. I am thinking about self-defense and not talking 
> about inciting a revolution. Re-read Jefferson’s quote. He talks about a 
> “last resort.” I am not trying to start a Revolt, I am talking about 
> self-defense. If the day for Revolution comes, when no peaceful options 
> exist, we may have to talk about that as well. None of us wants to think 
> about that, but please understand that a majority cannot take away your 
> rights as an American citizen. Only you can choose to give up your rights. 
> Congress could pass gun ban legislation by a 90%+ margin and it just would 
> not matter. I think some people are very unclear on this. This is the 
> reason we have a Supreme Court, and though I do not doubt that the Supreme 
> Court can also become corrupt, in 2008 they got it right. They supported 
> the constitution. It does not matter what the majority supports because 
> America is not a democracy. A constitutional republic protects the rights 
> of every single citizen, no matter what their “elected servants” say. A 
> majority in America only matters when the constitution is not in play. I 
> just wrote what every believer in the constitution wants to say, and what 
> every constitutional blogger needs to write. The truth of the matter is 
> that this type of speech is viewed as dangerous and radical or subversive, 
> and it could gain me a world of trouble that I do not want. It is also the 
> truth. To make myself clear I will tell you again. If they come for your 
> guns it is your right to use those guns against them and to kill them. You 
> are protected by our constitution. Most of the articles I am reading on the 
> subject are trying to give you clues without just coming out and saying it. 
> I understand that because certain things in this country will get you on a 
> list that you don’t want to be on. I may well be on that list. This blog is 
> small and growing so I may not be there yet, but I have dreams. I also have 
> my own list of subversives and anyone who attempts to deny my 
> constitutional rights is on that list. I am not the “subversive” here, it 
> is the political representatives who are threatening to take away my 
> inalienable rights. If they come to take my guns and I leave a few of them 
> wounded or dead, and I somehow survive, I have zero doubt that I will spend 
> a long time in prison and may face an execution. But I would much rather be 
> a political prisoner than a slave. If I go down fighting then I was not 
> fighting to harm these human beings. I was simply defending my liberty and 
> yours. It is self-defense and it is what our country was built on. We won 
> our freedom in self-defense. We would not be ruled by a tyrannical 
> government in the 1770s and we will not be ruled in 2012 by a tyrannical 
> government. There is no difference. This is a case of right and wrong. As 
> of now the 2nd amendment stands. It has never been repealed. If Feinstein 
> or Barack Husan have a problem with the constitution then they should be 
> removed from office. They are not defending the constitution which they 
> have sworn an oath to protect. It is treasonous to say the least. They 
> would likely say the same about me, but I have the constitution, the 
> founders, and the supreme court on my side. They only have their inflated 
> egos. I am not writing this to incite people. I am writing this in hopes 
> that somehow I can make a tiny difference. I have no idea how many of my 
> neighbors have the will to defend their constitutional rights. 2%? 20%? I 
> am afraid that 20% is a high number, unfortunately. When push comes to 
> shove many people may give up and submit to being ruled. I believe that our 
> government is banking on this. I would hope that our officials come to 
> realize that, regardless of our numbers, we still exist because they are 
> calling Patriotic Americans to action. They are making us decide if we want 
> to die free or submit to their rule. I cannot tell you where you should 
> stand on that. I do know that it may make the difference between living a 
> life of freedom or slavery. You must start thinking about this because I 
> believe that the day is coming soon and I personally believe it has already 
> been planned. Not all conspiracy theories are hogwash. They may throw down 
> the gauntlet soon and my suggestion is that you prepare yourself to react. 
> I mean no disrespect to our elected officials but they need to understand 
> that “We the People” will not be disarmed. If they proceed then it is they 
> that are provoking us and we will act accordingly. We are within our rights 
> to do so. For those who are in support of taking the guns, you need to ask 
> yourself a very important question, and I am not just talking about the 
> politicians, because if you support them, you have chosen your side.Are you 
> willing to die to take my guns? *
>
>  
>
>
>
>   
>
> -- 
> Bob R. O'Dell 
>
> [email protected] <javascript:>
>
>  
>
> __._,_.___
>   
>
>
>             
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to