http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2014/01/05/fbi_drops_law_enforcement_as_primary_mission#sthash.dTe9DVfT.dpbs
FBI Drops Law Enforcement as 'Primary' Mission

The FBI's creeping advance into the world of counterterrorism is nothing
new. But quietly and without notice, the agency has finally decided to make
it official in one of its organizational fact sheets. Instead of declaring
"law enforcement" as its "primary function," as it has for years, the FBI
fact sheet now lists "national security" as its chief mission. The changes
largely reflect the FBI reforms put in place after September 11, 2001,
which some have criticized for de-prioritizing law enforcement activities.
Regardless, with the 9/11 attacks more than a decade in the past, the
timing of the edits is baffling some FBI-watchers.

"What happened in the last year that changed?" asked Kel McClanahan, a
Washington-based national security lawyer.

McClanahan noticed the change last month while reviewing a Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) request from the agency. The FBI fact sheet
accompanies every FOIA response and highlights a variety of facts about the
agency. After noticing the change, McClanahan reviewed his records and saw
that the revised fact sheets began going out this summer. "I think they're
trying to rebrand," he said. "So many good things happen to your agency
when you tie it to national security."

Although a spokesman with the agency declined to weigh in on the timing of
the change, he said the agency is just keeping up with the times. "When our
mission changed after 9/11, our fact sheet changed to reflect that," FBI
spokesman Paul Bresson told Foreign Policy. He noted that the FBI's website
has long-emphasized the agency's national security focus. "We rank our top
10 priorities and CT [counterterrorism] is first, counterintel is second,
cyber is third," he said. "So it is certainly accurate to say our primary
function is national security." On numerous occasions, former FBI Director
Robert Mueller also emphasized the FBI's national security focus in
speeches and statements.

FBI historian and Marquette University professor Athan Theoharis agreed
that the changes reflect what's really happening at the agency, but said
the timing isn't clear. "I can't explain why FBI officials decided to
change the fact sheet... unless in the current political climate that
change benefits the FBI politically and undercuts criticisms," he said. He
mentioned the negative attention surrounding the FBI's failure in April to
foil the bomb plot at the Boston Marathon by Dzhokhar and Tamerlan
Tsarnaev.

Whatever the reason, the agency's increased focus on national security over
the last decade has not occurred without consequence. Between 2001 and
2009, the FBI 
doubled<http://cironline.org/blog/post/fbi-agents-dedicated-terror-doubled-eight-years-671>the
amount of agents dedicated to counterterrorism, according to a 2010
Inspector's General report<http://www.justice.gov/oig/reports/FBI/a1024.pdf>.
That period coincided with a steady decline in the overall number of
criminal cases investigated nationally and a steep decline in the number of
white-collar crime investigations.

"Violent crime, property crime and white-collar crime: All those things had
reductions in the number of people available to investigate them," former
FBI agent Brad Garrett told *Foreign Policy*. "Are there cases they missed?
Probably."

Last month, Robert Holley, the special agent in charge in Chicago, said the
agency's focus on terrorism and other crimes continued to affect the level
of resources available to combat the violent crime plaguing the city. "If I
put more resources on violent crime, I'd have to take away from other
things," he told
<http://www.ticklethewire.com/2013/12/26/with-terrorism-and-other-crimes-chicagos-fbi-struggles-to-find-resources-to-combat-violent-crime-in-chicago/>*The
Chicago 
Tribune*<http://www.ticklethewire.com/2013/12/26/with-terrorism-and-other-crimes-chicagos-fbi-struggles-to-find-resources-to-combat-violent-crime-in-chicago/>
.<http://www.ticklethewire.com/2013/12/26/with-terrorism-and-other-crimes-chicagos-fbi-struggles-to-find-resources-to-combat-violent-crime-in-chicago/>

According to a 2007 *Seattle Post-Intelligencer
*investigation<http://www.komonews.com/news/local/6970827.html>,
the Justice Department did not replace 2,400 agents assigned to focus on
counterterrorism in the years following 9/11. The reductions in
white-collar crime investigations became obvious. Back in 2000, the FBI
sent prosecutors 10,000 cases. That fell to a paltry 3,500 cases by 2005.
"Had the FBI continued investigating financial crimes at the same rate as
it had before the terror attacks, about 2,000 more white-collar criminals
would be behind bars," the report concluded. As a result, the agency
fielded criticism for failing to crack down on financial crimes ahead of
the Great Recession and losing sight of real-estate fraud ahead of the 2008
subprime mortgage crisis.

In many ways, the agency had no choice but to de-emphasize white-collar
crime. Following the 9/11 attacks, the FBI picked up scores of new
responsibilities
<http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/01/weekinreview/ideas-trends-terrorism-s-toll-on-the-fbi.html>related
to terrorism and counterintelligence while maintaining a finite amount of
resources. What's not in question is that government agencies tend to
benefit in numerous ways when considered critical to national security as
opposed to law enforcement. "If you tie yourself to national security, you
get funding and you get exemptions on disclosure cases," said McClanahan.
"You get all the wonderful arguments about how if you don't get your way,
buildings will blow up and the country will be less safe."




__._,_.___





__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to