“In Nixon tapes, Billy Graham refers to ‘synagogue of Satan’” 

That headline, which appeared yesterday in *USA Today*, is the latest 
damaging revelation about the great evangelical leader to come out of his 
conversations with President Richard Nixon.

In the Bible, the term “synagogue of Satan,” which appears in Revelation 
3:9<http://bible.cc/revelation/3-9.htm>, 
referred to those “who say that they are Jews and are not, but lie.” But in 
contemporary times the phrase has been grifted by conspiracy theorists and 
anti-Semites to refer to a Jewish cabal hell-bent on, and only moments away 
from, world domination; a Google search for “synagogue of Satan” will yield 
little in terms of exegesis but plenty of sites, like the one dedicated to 
the book pictured, warning that the *Protocols of the Elders of Zion* are 
real.

But what did Graham, the most influential evangelical of the 20th century, 
mean when in 1973 he talked with Nixon about the pornographers and 
promoters of obscenity who belong to the synagogue of 
Satan<http://www.jewishjournal.com/thegodblog/item/nixon_and_the_jews_billy_graham_and_the_synagogue_of_satan_20090625/>
?

It’s difficult to know. And the mainstream media doesn’t really seem to 
care.

Though this snippet from the Nixon tapes was picked up by Jewish media 
outlets (no, I’m not talking about *The New York Times*) and was latched 
onto by Anti-Defamation League major domo Abe Foxman — “While never 
expressing these views in public, Rev. Graham unabashedly held forth with 
the president with age-old classical anti-Semitic canard” — it has received 
almost no mainstream attention.

The only exception I could 
find<http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2009-06-24-graham-tapes_N.htm>was 
from Cathy Lynn Grossman, the religion reporter for *USA 
Today*, who wrote the story mentioned above:

The 1973 transcript is a wide-ranging conversation between Graham and Nixon 
in which Graham heaps praise on the president, telling him “Congratulations 
on everything,” and “I believe the Lord is with you.”

Nixon raises the news that Israel had mistakenly shot down a Libyan 
civilian airliner, killing all on board. Nixon says, “What I really think 
is, deep down in this country, there is a lot of anti-Semitism, and all 
this is going to do is stir it up.”

Graham agrees that it will push anti-Semitism “right to the top.” Then he 
turns the conversation to a report he read somewhere that Israel supposedly 
wants to “expel all the Christians.” Graham mentions Jewish opposition to a 
Christian evangelical unified campaign, saying Jews are “going right after 
the church.”

He also mentions an upcoming meeting with the interreligious affairs 
director of the American Jewish Committee, the late Rabbi Marc Tanenbaum. 
In 1977, the organization honored Graham, saying, according to Graham 
biographer William Martin, that “most of the progress of Protestant-Jewish 
relations over the past quarter century was due to Billy Graham.”

In 1973, Graham calls Tanenbaum the “cleverest and most brilliant” of the 
rabbis.

Nixon mentions an upcoming dinner with Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir, 
and Graham, who said in earlier taped conversations that Israelis were the 
best kind of Jews, now brings up a biblical reference to the dense and 
difficult final book of the Bible, Revelation, which says in verse 3:9 that 
there are those who claim to be Jews who are liars, and that they belong to 
a “synagogue of Satan.”

This is a prophetic book by John the apostle who, like Christ, was Jewish.

Grossman then concluded her article with the quote from Foxman that I 
mentioned above — in part, “Rev. Graham unabashedly held forth with the 
president with age-old classical anti-Semitic canards” — and with a defense 
from Graham’s longtime spokesman, A. Larry Ross:

But Ross says the “synagogue of Satan” phrase in the Book of Revelation 
actually refers to anyone whose “lives and work are not in keeping with 
traditional Jewish values.”

Likely in the interest of space, Grossman opted against quoting the third 
chapter of Revelation. But on her religion blog, she wrote a post that 
would have served as a nice sidebar to the story that appeared in print. In 
it she gives Ross a bit more of a forum and seems to defend Graham’s 
comments as something that are now being taken out of context. Grossman 
wrote<http://content.usatoday.com/communities/religion/post/2009/06/68465115/1>
:

The phrase appears twice in Scripture, Revelation 2:9-10 and, more 
elaborately, 3:9, which says:

*I know your deeds. See, I have placed before you an open door that no one 
can shut. I know that you have little strength, yet you have kept my works 
and make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews 
though they are not, but are liars — I will make them come and fall down at 
your feed and acknowledge that I have loved you.*

As I read it, in context, it’s a scourging attack on hypocrites, one that 
divides faithful Jews like Christ and John (author of Revelation) from 
unbelievers.

Rev. Louis Farrakahn used it to rail about “people in opposition to the 
will of God,” including President George Bush, in a 2004 speech at the 
National Press Club in Washington, D.C.

Ross, said in a press release Wednesday, that Revelation is referring to 
anyone

*… whose lives and work are not in keeping with traditional Jewish values. 
Throughout his ministry, Mr. Graham has consistently stood for purity of 
life and the sacredness of home and marriage, according to biblical 
precepts found in both the Old and New Testaments.*

I can’t argue with Ross on those points, but I’m also not willing to give 
Graham a pass on his conversations with Nixon.

Nixon’s troubled relationship with Jews — paranoid about their influence at 
best and anti-Semitic at worst — was no secret. But what about his 
spiritual counselor?

[image: 
PreacherAndPrezzies]<http://wp.patheos.com.s3.amazonaws.com/blogs/getreligion/files/2009/06/PreacherAndPrezzies.jpg>The
 
most informative answer I’ve seen to that question, and to the content of 
this Nixon-Graham conversation, was published this morning on the Religion 
in American History blog by Steven Miller, author of the well-reviewed 
book<http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/19/books/review/Douthat-t.html?_r=1> *Billy 
Graham and the Rise of the Republican South*. Miller 
wrote<http://usreligion.blogspot.com/2009/06/billy-graham-nixon-and-jews-as-gods.html>
:

Both believed that Israeli and American Jewish leaders underestimated, at 
their peril, the latent anti-Semitism among Americans, even among good 
Christian folk. Unsurprisingly, Nixon put the matter more crudely: “It may 
be they have a death wish.” But Graham also suggested that Israel was in 
danger of alienating its Christian allies, especially if American Jews 
continued “overreacting” to the emerging “Jews for Jesus” movement, which 
was “just scaring them to death.” In a line that makes for an easy 
headline, Graham quoted the Book of Revelation (2:9, 3:9) in describing the 
kind of Jews who belong to the “synagogue of Satan.” As with the 1972 
conversation, Graham certainly had in mind publishers of pornographic 
material; but, in the context of echoing Nixon’s distaste for the Fourth 
Estate, Graham also seemed to be thinking of high-profile Jewish liberals 
in the mainstream media. Graham, as I have written elsewhere concerning the 
1972 exchange, “was willing to indulge Nixon’s prejudices and . . . voice a 
few of his own.”

I was struck by the way in which Graham casually cited dispensationalist 
eschatology in discussing matters Jewish with Nixon. Jews are “God’s time 
piece,” Graham declared to an agreeable, grunting Nixon, “and he has judged 
them from generation to generation, and yet used them, and they’ve kept 
their identity.” I was struck because Graham-Nixon communications often 
were rather devoid of theological content. At the same time, as I have 
argued, Nixon was more comfortable with Graham’s evangelicalism than has 
been assumed (to the extent Nixon was comfortable with anything or anyone). 
Either way, Nixon and Graham undoubtedly shared a strong criticism of 
liberal media outlets, such as Newsweek and the New York Times. “And Henry 
Luce would turn over in his grave,” Graham declared to Nixon, if Luce knew 
what the formerly friendly Time was now publishing. Many members of the 
liberal media happened to be Jewish. That is, Nixon and Graham chose to 
notice the presence of Jews therein.

The Graham who comes through in this conversation suggests the fine line 
between emerging Israel-philia and lingering anti-Semitism among early 
1970s evangelicals.

When a previous batch of 500 hours of Nixon tapes were released in 2002, 
Graham was forced to 
apologize<http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1850077.stm>for having told the 
president that he believed Jews had a “stranglehold” on 
American media that “has got to be broken or this country’s going down the 
drain.” Worse yet, he had told Nixon in that 1972 conversation that some of 
his best friends were Jewish:

“A lot of Jews are great friends of mine. They swarm around me and are 
friendly to me, because they know that I am friendly to Israel and so 
forth, but they don’t know how I really feel about what they’re doing to 
this country, and I have no power and no way to handle them.”

This from a fervent supporter of Israel who had been honored by the 
American Jewish Committee for being responsible for major advancements in 
Protestant-Jewish relations.

Painful as it is for me to consider the possibility that a hero of my faith 
harbored sentiments that would endear him to the Rev. Jeremiah 
Wright<http://www.jewishjournal.com/thegodblog/item/rev_wright_and_them_jews_20090611/>,
 
Graham’s words seem to speak louder than his actions. And though Graham refused 
to join in calls for Jews to convert<http://www.newsweek.com/id/46365/page/5>, 
I have to wonder if his “synagogue of Satan” comment was really directed at 
those Jews who called themselves Jews but had both missed the Messiah and 
had stopped living like Jews. In short, those same Hollywood Jews who he 
thought had “stranglehold” on American media.

But really we don’t know. Graham is 90 now and not doing interviews. And 
what we know about Graham’s true feelings toward Jews is obscured by 
previous soft interviews, public exhortations and, now, another round of 
Nixon tapes.


On Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:12:27 AM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>    BareNakedIslam posted: "Graham, who oversees the international 
> Christian aid group Samaritan’s Purse, said, “We should be absolutely 
> afraid of Sharia law. No question about it, because there’s no tolerance in 
> Sharia law. It persecutes those that do not believe in Islam.” Reveren"   
>    
>    New post on *BARE NAKED ISLAM*         
> <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>  Rev. Franklin Graham says: 
> “Muslims who want practice sharia law should go back to where they 
> came 
> from”<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/04/19/rev-franklin-graham-says-muslims-who-want-practice-sharia-law-should-go-back-to-where-they-came-from/>
>  by 
> BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>  
>
> Graham, who oversees the international Christian aid group Samaritan’s 
> Purse, said, “We should be absolutely afraid of Sharia law. No question 
> about it, because there’s no tolerance in Sharia law. It persecutes those 
> that do not believe in Islam.” Reverend Graham is the son of evangelist 
> Billy Graham.
>
> Read more of this 
> post<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/04/19/rev-franklin-graham-says-muslims-who-want-practice-sharia-law-should-go-back-to-where-they-came-from/>
>   *BareNakedIslam <http://www.barenakedislam.com/?author=1>* | April 19, 
> 2014 at 4:03 am | Categories: Just the 
> Facts<http://www.barenakedislam.com/?taxonomy=category&term=just-the-facts>| 
> URL: 
> http://wp.me/p276zM-13sV 
>
>  
> Comment<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/04/19/rev-franklin-graham-says-muslims-who-want-practice-sharia-law-should-go-back-to-where-they-came-from/#respond>
>  
>    See all 
> comments<http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/04/19/rev-franklin-graham-says-muslims-who-want-practice-sharia-law-should-go-back-to-where-they-came-from/#comments>
>   
>
>      
> Unsubscribe<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=7f89380f46003915c34c2cdd2b126a38&email=bovinescatologists%40gmail.com&b=LCS35_TWbNdUW%3DZZb%2FYQS%7Efugc2yAlV%2BQWSv%2BZgWOXZl.uenT_4>to
>  no longer receive posts from BARE NAKED ISLAM.
> Change your email settings at Manage 
> Subscriptions<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=7f89380f46003915c34c2cdd2b126a38&email=bovinescatologists%40gmail.com>.
>  
>
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser: 
>
> http://www.barenakedislam.com/2014/04/19/rev-franklin-graham-says-muslims-who-want-practice-sharia-law-should-go-back-to-where-they-came-from/
>  
>     
>    
>   
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to