Robert “Tosh” Plumlee is currently in the crosshairs of a very angry Holder Justice Department for publicly posting 11 “questions” about Benghazi and the illegal weapons running operations being conducted by criminal elements within the U.S. government. --- gun running is a dangerous business that can get you killed. but they knew that before they were killed.
On Friday, May 2, 2014 12:37:33 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > *http://tinyurl.com/ndnftk7 <http://tinyurl.com/ndnftk7>* > > > > > The questions asked by Mr. Plumlee that the government wants so badly to > censorCIA Whistleblower faces the ire of an angry Justice Department over > Benghazi questions > > *By Doug Hagmann* Friday, May 2, 2014 > > [image: http://canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/hagmann050214.jpg] > > Longtime former CIA field operative turned whistleblower Robert “Tosh” > Plumlee is currently in the crosshairs of a very angry Holder Justice > Department for publicly posting 11 “questions” about Benghazi and the > illegal weapons running operations being conducted by criminal elements > within the U.S. government. Mr. Plumlee is no ordinary CIA whistleblower, > however. > > Because of his extensive history and knowledge of the criminal > infiltration into the U.S. government, their methods and operations, Mr. > Plumlee has become one of the most dangerous men to the criminal cabal > operating at the highest levels of the U.S. government. The Holder Justice > Department and the criminal “gatekeepers” within the CIA and other > government agencies desperately want him silenced—and they absolutely > intend to do just that. > > Against the advice of many people, from his own attorney to those who care > about his welfare in the face of direct and subtle threats, and under the > reported threat of subpoena by U.S. Attorney General Holder himself, Mr. > Plumlee laid it all out in stunning detail on the Wednesday, April 30, > 2014 edition of The Hagmann & Hagmann > Report<http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/10636>. > Based on information from his deep cover sources, the questions Mr. Plumlee > formulated about Benghazi leave no doubt that criminal elements that exist > within the highest levels of the U.S. government were engaged in a massive > weapons smuggling operation based out of Benghazi and other locations in > Libya. > > His disclosures, in the form of 11 questions, validate the information I > provided in nearly four dozen separate reports since the 2012 attacks. They > expose that the operations of the criminal cabal that were operating under > diplomatic cover are in direct violation of U.S. and international law. > They are, in large part, responsible for the quarter-of-a-million deaths of > men, women and children in Syria and the millions of refugees. Those > numbers are still climbing, and the path being laid is taking us and the > world to World War III. > > Through their “gatekeepers,” a cover-up of unprecedented magnitude about > what the takeover of Libya and the attack in Benghazi is really about > continues. Under the direction and with the imprimatur of the highest > levels of government, facilitated by the infiltrated and fully captured > corporate media, the American people are being lied to, misinformed and > misdirected about criminal actions that have global implications that are > orchestrating a war to which we did not sign on. > > The disclosures by Mr. Plumlee represent a very serious threat to the > plans of the globalist war machine, and this criminal cabal is actively > trying to cover it up and keep it secret from the American public and the > world. This operation is, by orders of magnitude far greater than anything > we have seen to date, including the operations known as Iran-Contra. Mr. > Plumlee should know, for he admits and has testified before congress to > transporting some 40 tons of cocaine into the U.S., while transporting tons > of weapons, including automatic weapons and grenade launchers out of the > U.S. into the hands of “rebels” during the Iran-Contra era. > > At that time, Mr. Plumlee was told that the drug shipments coming into the > U.S. were part of a drug interdiction program in the government’s war on > drugs. When he learned that he was being used as a pawn in a much larger > game of criminal geopolitical chess, he did what our laws required him to > do; he testified about his actions and knowledge before a Congressional > committee, and turned over his log books, maps and other supporting > documentation so that the criminal enterprise could be exposed and stopped. > > Once he provided his testimony, much of the information was immediately > classified and he was gagged from talking about what he knew. Incredibly, > his own testimony exceeded his security classification, which denied him > access to his own records and testimony. That is one of the ways they are > able to silence and bury the truth of a world that few Americans know exist. > > The current plight of whistleblower Robert “Tosh” Plumlee began last > October, when he posted 11 “questions” about Benghazi and the illegal arms > running operations on Facebook. As quickly as they appeared in the social > media stream, the CIA and the Department of Justice instructed him to > remove those questions from the public domain and remain forever silent > about the covert and highly illegal weapons running operations being > conducted. Despite his classification as a photojournalist with Salem-News > that provided him the legitimacy to report on Benghazi, he complied. > > When certain revelations about Benghazi were recently made public, Mr. > Plumlee knew that remaining silent was not an option. The deaths of four > Americans weighed heavily on his conscious, and his own character and > integrity would not allow him to be silenced, regardless of the threats to > him. Accordingly, Mr. Plumlee decided to republish the 11 questions that > provide insight into the activities being covertly performed by the U.S. > government. His actions quickly caught the attention of the government > “gatekeepers,” who are now reportedly coming at him with a vengeance to > silence him and all further discussion about Benghazi. > > Earlier this week, Mr. Plumlee was told by two high-level sources that a > subpoena was being prepared by the Holder Justice Department, and would be > soon served upon him. The purpose of such a subpoena is twofold. First, the > government needs to legally silence him, which becomes automatic once he is > under subpoena. Secondly, the government is desperately seeking the > identity of his source(s) who provided him specific information about > Benghazi. Mr. Plumlee knows what to expect as he has traveled this road > during Iran-Contra. Unlike Iran-Contra, however, the stakes today are much > greater, the crimes much more egregious, the death toll exponentially > higher, and the political ramifications exceedingly greater than at any > other time in history. > > It is the sole objective of Mr. Plumlee to tell Americans, and the world, > what he knows without any political spin. He wants us to know exactly what > is going on under the direction of the criminal elements that exist within > our government and a rogue element within the CIA operating under their > authority. Before he could be served with a subpoena that is reportedly > being prepared that would make it impossible for him to talk without facing > prison, for this is how the government now treats whistleblowers, he laid > it all out in his 90-minute interview. > > For his candor and hours after the interview, he confided to me that he > was informed by at least one highly placed government source that his > public interview on our show was heard and documented by the Department of > Justice. He was informed, as I was, that his disclosures angered the > Department of Justice as well as some in the CIA hierarchy and other > government offices, and that he had no “right” to discuss such matters. > This, despite the inconvenient fact that he would be guilty of a felony by > not disclosing illegal government operations to authorities. But when the > authorities, or those we have elected to oversee and stop such egregiously > illegal actions fail to do anything other than respond by asking for > campaign contributions via form letters, he felt he had to go public. And > so he did, with a clear conscious and without regard to the peril he now > faces. > > The corporate media, from MSNBC to Fox, have treated the issue of Benghazi > as the “third rail” of subjects. They call it a scandal, but it’s not. It’s > a crime, as is its cover-up. They have failed the American people by not > holding government accountable for their illegal actions, which are only > escalating as a result. MSNBC considers Benghazi a “myth” trumped up by a > right-wing political agenda, while Fox considers the topic just too “edgy.” > Meanwhile, the American public is being thrust into a covert war without > our approval yet in our name, and the flagrant violations of U.S. and > international law are being conducted with impunity. Continuing the > cover-up will merely embolden the criminals and criminal element within our > government and will cost more lives in the process. It is also leading us > headlong into World War III. > > We must continue to demand full disclosure by those we elected, and demand > accountability by those in the media. We are running out of time. > > The questions asked by Mr. Plumlee that the government wants so badly to > censor remain, at least for now, on his Facebook > page<https://www.facebook.com/robert.plumlee.5>. > They are reprinted here for your review. I suggest that everyone reading > this demands answers, if not for the sake and future of Mr. Plumlee, then > for the sake of our future. > > 1. Is the United States secretly arming and supporting various > factions of the Syrian Rebels with high caliber impact weapons from The > United States arsenals? > > 2. Is the United States little known Direct Commercial Sales Program, > also known as ʻ‘The Blue Lantern Report”, being used as a ʻ‘cutoutʼ’ to > secretly aid both sides of a Middle Eastern civil war? > > 3. Is America again playing both sides against the middle for > corporate gain as previously demonstrated by the Cuban Project of the > fifties and sixties, as well as the Iran Contra fiasco of the eighties and > the South American—Mexican Drug Wars of the nineties? > > It has been established via some field reports from the Middle East and > some isolated media reports that the Direct Commercial Sales Program (DCSP) > an American international program, which legally allows the United States > to sell weapons to a host of foreign countries without monitoring those > weapons after leaving our arsenals, stockpiles, and jurisdiction, has > shipped High Impact weapons to Syrian Rebels during the last two years. > > 4. I have to ask. What happens to those weapons after legally being > sold via this program and they leave our control? > > 5. Are they being monitored, traced, certified, and inventoried after > arriving in other countries? > > 6. Will our troops one day again face these American made weapons on > some foreign battlefield? > > 7. Is this Direct Commercial Sales program a secret cash cow for many > US Corporations, International arms merchants, its insiders, or affiliates? > > 8. Is it possible this could be another ʻ‘off-‐‑the-‐‑booksʼ’ secret > covert operation ran by the CIAʼ’s Special Tactical Unit, similar to the > Iran-‐‑Contra operations of the eighties and the old Cuban projects of > the fifties and sixties, where we supplied both sides weapons and escalated > the conflict for personal and corporate gain? > > 9. Could we be selling and supplying dangerous high impact weapons, > while aiding and financing both sides of a Civil War in Syria? > > 10. Could we be escalating the Middle East conflict either knowingly or > unintentionally providing weapons to both sides of the Syrian conflict? > These are simple questions. I’m just asking: > > 11. Did our Ambassador and others, weeks before they were murdered, > notify our State Department and CIA that Syrian Rebels had obtained US > Weapons, including “Stinger missiles’ from Jordan, Turkey, Pakistan, > shipped from CIA safe houses? > > 12. Were they told to “Stand Down? > > > > > __._,_.___ > > > Visit Your > Group<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdmdtbGJtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzOTkwNDUyMjU-> > > > > [image: Yahoo! > Groups]<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYXIwamloBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM5OTA0NTIyNQ--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of > Use<https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
