That is blatantly not true, and a typical far left extremist statement,  *e.g.;
*"*The reason that the Ambassador and three other Americans were killed was
because of gun running*".

You need to get your Anti-Americanism in check Plain Ol',  your hatred for
your country is clouding your perspective......​


On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 2:27 PM, plainolamerican
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Gun running has nothing to do with the coverup by our President and his
> Administration.
> ---
> it's just the reason they were killed.
>
>
> Assuming for a moment that there was gun running in Libya and specifically
> Benghazi, this still doesn't justify the Obama Administration lying to the
> American public and blaming a purported videotape (which no one had ever
> seen)  as the culprit of the Benghazi Consulate attack.
> ---
> I agree.
>
> *Washington (CNN)* -- The United States plans to send small arms,
> ammunition and potentially anti-tank weapons to Syria's rebels, two
> officials familiar with the matter told CNN on Friday. President Barack
> Obama's administration has declined to provide details about increased
> military assistance for the rebels following its announcement Thursday that
> Syria crossed a "red line" with its use of chemical weapons. Ben Rhodes, a
> U.S. deputy national security adviser, told reporters that Washington will
> "increase the size and scope of the assistance." When pushed for more
> details, Rhodes said: "I can't give you a specific timeline or itemized
> list of what that assistance is."
>  McCain pushes more intervention in Syria
>  Fareed's Take: U.S. arming Syrian rebels
>
>  The weapons will be provided by the CIA, the officials told CNN's chief
> White House correspondent Jessica Yellin.
>
> It was in fact al Queada members and affiliates who attacked the Benghazi
> Consulate Office and killed our Ambassador and three other Americans.
> ---
> they gave the US ample warning to stay out.
>
>
> The President, the Secretary of State did nothing in an attempt to protect
> these Americans, and then lied about what the cause of the attack was over,
> during a Presidential campaign.
> ---
> they also foolishly believe in the interventionist policy.
>
> President Obama should resign over this,  and I doubt very seriously that
> former Secretary of State Clinton has any political future after the last
> revelations.​
> ---
> opinion noted.
>
>
> On Friday, May 2, 2014 12:59:47 PM UTC-5, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> Gun running has nothing to do with the coverup by our President and his
>> Administration.   Assuming for a moment that there was gun running in Libya
>> and specifically Benghazi, this still doesn't justify the Obama
>> Administration lying to the American public and blaming a purported
>> videotape (which no one had ever seen)  as the culprit of the Benghazi
>> Consulate attack.
>>
>> It was in fact al Queada members and affiliates who attacked the Benghazi
>> Consulate Office and killed our Ambassador and three other Americans.  The
>> President, the Secretary of State did nothing in an attempt to protect
>> these Americans, and then lied about what the cause of the attack was over,
>> during a Presidential campaign.
>>
>> President Obama should resign over this,  and I doubt very seriously that
>> former Secretary of State Clinton has any political future after the last
>> revelations.​
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 1:53 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Robert “Tosh” Plumlee is currently in the crosshairs of a very angry
>>> Holder Justice Department for publicly posting 11 “questions” about
>>> Benghazi and the illegal weapons running operations being conducted by
>>> criminal elements within the U.S. government.
>>> ---
>>> gun running is a dangerous business that can get you killed.
>>> but they knew that before they were killed.
>>>
>>> On Friday, May 2, 2014 12:37:33 PM UTC-5, Travis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *http://tinyurl.com/ndnftk7 <http://tinyurl.com/ndnftk7>*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The questions asked by Mr. Plumlee that the government wants so badly
>>>> to censorCIA Whistleblower faces the ire of an angry Justice
>>>> Department over Benghazi questions
>>>>
>>>> *By Doug Hagmann*  Friday, May 2, 2014
>>>>
>>>> [image: http://canadafreepress.com/images/uploads/hagmann050214.jpg]
>>>>
>>>> Longtime former CIA field operative turned whistleblower Robert “Tosh”
>>>> Plumlee is currently in the crosshairs of a very angry Holder Justice
>>>> Department for publicly posting 11 “questions” about Benghazi and the
>>>> illegal weapons running operations being conducted by criminal elements
>>>> within the U.S. government. Mr. Plumlee is no ordinary CIA whistleblower,
>>>> however.
>>>>
>>>> Because of his extensive history and knowledge of the criminal
>>>> infiltration into the U.S. government, their methods and operations, Mr.
>>>> Plumlee has become one of the most dangerous men to the criminal cabal
>>>> operating at the highest levels of the U.S. government. The Holder Justice
>>>> Department and the criminal “gatekeepers” within the CIA and other
>>>> government agencies desperately want him silenced—and they absolutely
>>>> intend to do just that.
>>>>
>>>> Against the advice of many people, from his own attorney to those who
>>>> care about his welfare in the face of direct and subtle threats, and under
>>>> the reported threat of subpoena by U.S. Attorney General Holder himself,
>>>> Mr. Plumlee laid it all out in stunning detail on the Wednesday, April
>>>> 30, 2014 edition of The Hagmann & Hagmann 
>>>> Report<http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/archives/10636>.
>>>> Based on information from his deep cover sources, the questions Mr. Plumlee
>>>> formulated about Benghazi leave no doubt that criminal elements that exist
>>>> within the highest levels of the U.S. government were engaged in a massive
>>>> weapons smuggling operation based out of Benghazi and other locations in
>>>> Libya.
>>>>
>>>> His disclosures, in the form of 11 questions, validate the information
>>>> I provided in nearly four dozen separate reports since the 2012 attacks.
>>>> They expose that the operations of the criminal cabal that were operating
>>>> under diplomatic cover are in direct violation of U.S. and international
>>>> law. They are, in large part, responsible for the quarter-of-a-million
>>>> deaths of men, women and children in Syria and the millions of refugees.
>>>> Those numbers are still climbing, and the path being laid is taking us and
>>>> the world to World War III.
>>>>
>>>> Through their “gatekeepers,” a cover-up of unprecedented magnitude
>>>> about what the takeover of Libya and the attack in Benghazi is really about
>>>> continues. Under the direction and with the imprimatur of the highest
>>>> levels of government, facilitated by the infiltrated and fully captured
>>>> corporate media, the American people are being lied to, misinformed and
>>>> misdirected about criminal actions that have global implications that are
>>>> orchestrating a war to which we did not sign on.
>>>>
>>>> The disclosures by Mr. Plumlee represent a very serious threat to the
>>>> plans of the globalist war machine, and this criminal cabal is actively
>>>> trying to cover it up and keep it secret from the American public and the
>>>> world. This operation is, by orders of magnitude far greater than anything
>>>> we have seen to date, including the operations known as Iran-Contra. Mr.
>>>> Plumlee should know, for he admits and has testified before congress to
>>>> transporting some 40 tons of cocaine into the U.S., while transporting tons
>>>> of weapons, including automatic weapons and grenade launchers out of the
>>>> U.S. into the hands of “rebels” during the Iran-Contra era.
>>>>
>>>> At that time, Mr. Plumlee was told that the drug shipments coming into
>>>> the U.S. were part of a drug interdiction program in the government’s war
>>>> on drugs. When he learned that he was being used as a pawn in a much larger
>>>> game of criminal geopolitical chess, he did what our laws required him to
>>>> do; he testified about his actions and knowledge before a Congressional
>>>> committee, and turned over his log books, maps and other supporting
>>>> documentation so that the criminal enterprise could be exposed and stopped.
>>>>
>>>> Once he provided his testimony, much of the information was immediately
>>>> classified and he was gagged from talking about what he knew. Incredibly,
>>>> his own testimony exceeded his security classification, which denied him
>>>> access to his own records and testimony. That is one of the ways they are
>>>> able to silence and bury the truth of a world that few Americans know 
>>>> exist.
>>>>
>>>> The current plight of whistleblower Robert “Tosh” Plumlee began last
>>>> October, when he posted 11 “questions” about Benghazi and the illegal arms
>>>> running operations on Facebook. As quickly as they appeared in the social
>>>> media stream, the CIA and the Department of Justice instructed him to
>>>> remove those questions from the public domain and remain forever silent
>>>> about the covert and highly illegal weapons running operations being
>>>> conducted. Despite his classification as a photojournalist with Salem-News
>>>> that provided him the legitimacy to report on Benghazi, he complied.
>>>>
>>>> When certain revelations about Benghazi were recently made public, Mr.
>>>> Plumlee knew that remaining silent was not an option. The deaths of four
>>>> Americans weighed heavily on his conscious, and his own character and
>>>> integrity would not allow him to be silenced, regardless of the threats to
>>>> him. Accordingly, Mr. Plumlee decided to republish the 11 questions that
>>>> provide insight into the activities being covertly performed by the U.S.
>>>> government. His actions quickly caught the attention of the government
>>>> “gatekeepers,” who are now reportedly coming at him with a vengeance to
>>>> silence him and all further discussion about Benghazi.
>>>>
>>>> Earlier this week, Mr. Plumlee was told by two high-level sources that
>>>> a subpoena was being prepared by the Holder Justice Department, and would
>>>> be soon served upon him. The purpose of such a subpoena is twofold. First,
>>>> the government needs to legally silence him, which becomes automatic once
>>>> he is under subpoena. Secondly, the government is desperately seeking the
>>>> identity of his source(s) who provided him specific information about
>>>> Benghazi. Mr. Plumlee knows what to expect as he has traveled this road
>>>> during Iran-Contra. Unlike Iran-Contra, however, the stakes today are much
>>>> greater, the crimes much more egregious, the death toll exponentially
>>>> higher, and the political ramifications exceedingly greater than at any
>>>> other time in history.
>>>>
>>>> It is the sole objective of Mr. Plumlee to tell Americans, and the
>>>> world, what he knows without any political spin. He wants us to know
>>>> exactly what is going on under the direction of the criminal elements that
>>>> exist within our government and a rogue element within the CIA operating
>>>> under their authority. Before he could be served with a subpoena that is
>>>> reportedly being prepared that would make it impossible for him to talk
>>>> without facing prison, for this is how the government now treats
>>>> whistleblowers, he laid it all out in his 90-minute interview.
>>>>
>>>> For his candor and hours after the interview, he confided to me that he
>>>> was informed by at least one highly placed government source that his
>>>> public interview on our show was heard and documented by the Department of
>>>> Justice. He was informed, as I was, that his disclosures angered the
>>>> Department of Justice as well as some in the CIA hierarchy and other
>>>> government offices, and that he had no “right” to discuss such matters.
>>>> This, despite the inconvenient fact that he would be guilty of a felony by
>>>> not disclosing illegal government operations to authorities. But when the
>>>> authorities, or those we have elected to oversee and stop such egregiously
>>>> illegal actions fail to do anything other than respond by asking for
>>>> campaign contributions via form letters, he felt he had to go public. And
>>>> so he did, with a clear conscious and without regard to the peril he now
>>>> faces.
>>>>
>>>> The corporate media, from MSNBC to Fox, have treated the issue of
>>>> Benghazi as the “third rail” of subjects. They call it a scandal, but it’s
>>>> not. It’s a crime, as is its cover-up. They have failed the American people
>>>> by not holding government accountable for their illegal actions, which are
>>>> only escalating as a result. MSNBC considers Benghazi a “myth” trumped up
>>>> by a right-wing political agenda, while Fox considers the topic just too
>>>> “edgy.” Meanwhile, the American public is being thrust into a covert war
>>>> without our approval yet in our name, and the flagrant violations of U.S.
>>>> and international law are being conducted with impunity. Continuing the
>>>> cover-up will merely embolden the criminals and criminal element within our
>>>> government and will cost more lives in the process. It is also leading us
>>>> headlong into World War III.
>>>>
>>>> We must continue to demand full disclosure by those we elected, and
>>>> demand accountability by those in the media. We are running out of time.
>>>>
>>>> The questions asked by Mr. Plumlee that the government wants so badly
>>>> to censor remain, at least for now, on his Facebook 
>>>> page<https://www.facebook.com/robert.plumlee.5>.
>>>> They are reprinted here for your review. I suggest that everyone reading
>>>> this demands answers, if not for the sake and future of Mr. Plumlee, then
>>>> for the sake of our future.
>>>>
>>>> 1.    Is the United States secretly arming and supporting various
>>>> factions of the Syrian Rebels with high caliber impact weapons from The
>>>> United States arsenals?
>>>>
>>>> 2.    Is the United States little known Direct Commercial Sales
>>>> Program, also known as ʻ‘The Blue Lantern Report”, being used as a ʻ‘
>>>> cutoutʼ’ to secretly aid both sides of a Middle Eastern civil war?
>>>>
>>>> 3.    Is America again playing both sides against the middle for
>>>> corporate gain as previously demonstrated by the Cuban Project of the
>>>> fifties and sixties, as well as the Iran Contra fiasco of the eighties and
>>>> the South American—Mexican Drug Wars of the nineties?
>>>>
>>>> It has been established via some field reports from the Middle East and
>>>> some isolated media reports that the Direct Commercial Sales Program (DCSP)
>>>> an American international program, which legally allows the United States
>>>> to sell weapons to a host of foreign countries without monitoring those
>>>> weapons after leaving our arsenals, stockpiles, and jurisdiction, has
>>>> shipped High Impact weapons to Syrian Rebels during the last two years.
>>>>
>>>> 4.    I have to ask. What happens to those weapons after legally being
>>>> sold via this program and they leave our control?
>>>>
>>>> 5.    Are they being monitored, traced, certified, and inventoried
>>>> after arriving in other countries?
>>>>
>>>> 6.    Will our troops one day again face these American made weapons
>>>> on some foreign battlefield?
>>>>
>>>> 7.    Is this Direct Commercial Sales program a secret cash cow for
>>>> many US Corporations, International arms merchants, its insiders, or
>>>> affiliates?
>>>>
>>>> 8.    Is it possible this could be another ʻ‘off-‐‑the-‐‑booksʼ’secret 
>>>> covert operation ran by the CIA
>>>> ʼ’s Special Tactical Unit, similar to the Iran-‐‑Contra operations of
>>>> the eighties and the old Cuban projects of the fifties and sixties, where
>>>> we supplied both sides weapons and escalated the conflict for personal and
>>>> corporate gain?
>>>>
>>>> 9.    Could we be selling and supplying dangerous high impact weapons,
>>>> while aiding and financing both sides of a Civil War in Syria?
>>>>
>>>> 10.  Could we be escalating the Middle East conflict either knowingly
>>>> or unintentionally providing weapons to both sides of the Syrian conflict?
>>>> These are simple questions. I’m just asking:
>>>>
>>>> 11.  Did our Ambassador and others, weeks before they were murdered,
>>>> notify our State Department and CIA that Syrian Rebels had obtained US
>>>> Weapons, including “Stinger missiles’ from Jordan, Turkey, Pakistan,
>>>> shipped from CIA safe houses?
>>>>
>>>> 12.  Were they told to “Stand Down?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __._,_.___
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Visit Your 
>>>> Group<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdmdtbGJtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEzOTkwNDUyMjU->
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  [image: Yahoo! 
>>>> Groups]<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYXIwamloBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTM5OTA0NTIyNQ-->
>>>> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html>•
>>>> Unsubscribe • Terms of 
>>>> Use<https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>
>>>>
>>>> __,_._,___
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "PoliticalForum" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to