http://stupidfrogs.org/articles/seize_the_day_control_the_agenda.html


Seize the Day, Control the Agenda



By Charles Krauthammer
WashingtonPost.com

[image: http://stupidfrogs.org/images/american_flags.jpg]
(Luke Sharrett/Bloomberg)

Memo to the GOP. You had a great night on Tuesday
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/2014/11/05/4156eaf0-5330-11e4-892e-602188e70e9c_story.html>.
But remember: You didn’t win it. The Democrats lost it.

This is not to say that you didn’t show discipline in making the election a
referendum on six years of Barack Obama. You exercised adult supervision
over the choice of candidates. You didn’t allow yourself to go down the
byways of gender and other identity politics.

It showed: a gain of probably nine Senate seats
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/senate-control-at-stake-in-todays-midterm-elections/2014/11/04/e882353e-642c-11e4-bb14-4cfea1e742d5_story.html>,
the largest Republican House majority in more than 80 years, and astonishing
gubernatorial victories
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/governors-wisconsin-vote-tests-walkers-ambitions/2014/11/04/81ee2ffe-6480-11e4-ab86-46000e1d0035_story.html>,
including Massachusetts, Maryland and Illinois, the bluest of the blue,
giving lie to the Democrats’ excuse
<http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/05/us/president-obama-left-fighting-for-his-own-relevancy.html?_r=0>
that they lost because the game was played on Republican turf.

The defeat — “a massacre,” the Economist called it
<http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2014/11/us-2014-mid-term-election-results>—
marks the final collapse of Obamaism, a species of left liberalism so
intrusive, so incompetently executed and ultimately so unpopular that it
will be seen as a parenthesis in American political history.
Notwithstanding Obama’s awkward denials at his next-day news conference
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/day-after-defeats-obama-strikes-defiant-tone/2014/11/05/ef8f1508-654a-11e4-ab86-46000e1d0035_story.html>,
he himself defined the election when he insisted just last month
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/10/02/28-words-that-democrats-really-wish-president-obama-didnt-say-today/>
that “these [i.e. his] policies are on the ballot — every single one of
them.”

They were, and America spoke. But it was a negative judgment, not an
endorsement of the GOP. The prize for winning is nothing but the
opportunity for Republicans to show that they can govern — the opportunity
to seize the national agenda.

Five weeks ago, I suggested
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-the-real-reason-winning-the-senate-matters/2014/10/02/b1423b66-4a5d-11e4-a046-120a8a855cca_story.html>
a series of initiatives that would be like the 1994 “Contract with America”
but this time post facto. It’s not rocket science. Mitch McConnell, the
incoming Senate majority leader, and Speaker John Boehner are already at
work
<http://online.wsj.com/articles/john-boehner-and-mitch-mcconnell-now-we-can-get-congress-going-1415232759>
producing such an agenda.

It needs to be urgent, determined and relentless. Say, a bill a week for
the first 10 weeks. Start with obvious measures with significant Democratic
support, like the Keystone XL pipeline.

Like fast-track trade negotiation authority that Harry Reid killed
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/republican-gains-could-aid-obamas-asia-trade-pact/2014/11/02/a666a000-6273-11e4-ab86-46000e1d0035_story.html>
and that Obama, like all presidents, wants. Republicans should propose and
pass it, thereby giving Obama a victory and demonstrating both
bipartisanship and magnanimity (as well as economic good sense).

Then a simple, targeted bill to repatriate the $2 trillion of assets being
held by U.S. corporations overseas, a bill to authorize and expedite the
export of liquid natural gas and crude oil (the latter banned by an obsolete
1975 law
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/01/08/u-s-oil-exports-have-been-banned-for-40-years-is-it-time-for-that-to-change/>)
and a strong border security bill.

As for Obamacare, a symbolic abolition that Obama will immediately veto is
less important than multiple rapid-fire measures to kill it with a thousand
cuts. Repeal of the medical device tax. Repeal of the individual mandate.
Repeal of the employer mandate. Repeal of the coverage mandate, thereby
reinstating Obama’s broken promise
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/wp/2013/10/30/obamas-pledge-that-no-one-will-take-away-your-health-plan/>
that “If you like your health-care plan, you can keep it.” And repeal the
federal bailout for insurers on the Obamacare exchanges.

If Obama issues vetoes, fine. Let the Democrats defend them for the next
two years.

Then go big and go positive: a sweeping reform of the tax system, both
corporate and individual, abolishing loopholes and lowering rates, like the
historic Reagan-O’Neill 1986 reform or Obama’s own abandoned Simpson-Bowles
commission. And go large: Invite the other side into immediate negotiations
with the aim of producing a tax bill by spring.

How will Obama react? My guess — with the petulance and denial he displayed
in his post-election news conference. Moreover, he will try to regain
control of the national agenda with executive amnesty
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/congress/obama-firm-on-vow-to-act-on-immigration-this-year/2014/11/05/af658b1c-652a-11e4-ab86-46000e1d0035_story.html>
for illegal immigrants.

Final memo to the GOP: That would be naked impeachment bait
<http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/charles-krauthammer-amnesty-as-impeachment-bait/2014/08/07/1765829c-1e6a-11e4-ae54-0cfe1f974f8a_story.html>.
Don’t take it. Use the power of the purse to defund it. Pledge immediate
repeal if Republicans take the White House in 2017. Denounce it as both
unconstitutional and bad policy. But don’t let it overwhelm and overtake
the GOP agenda. That’s exactly what Obama wants. It is his only way to
regain the initiative.

The 2014 election has given the GOP the rare opportunity to retroactively
redeem its brand. The conventional perception, incessantly repeated by
Democrats and the media, is that Washington dysfunction is the work of the
Party of No. Expose the real agent of do-nothing. Show that, when Harry
Reid can no longer consign House-passed legislation to oblivion, Congress
can actually work.

Pass legislation. When Obama signs, you’ve shown seriousness and the
ability to govern. When he vetoes, you’ve clarified the differences between
party philosophies and prepared the ground for 2016.

Tuesday’s victory was big. But it did nothing more than level the playing
field and give you a shot. Take it.




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdXN1NDZtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTUzODQ3NjA->

   - New Members
   
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnb3Z2MjkyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDE1Mzg0NzYw>
   1

 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlb2cwbmRnBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxNTM4NDc2MA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to