http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/11/a_suicidal_collapse_of_western_civilization.html



November 16, 2014
A Suicidal Collapse of Western Civilization?

By S. Fred Singer <http://www.americanthinker.com/author/s_fred_singer/>

My background is basically European -- and more specifically, Western
European.  I have lived and worked in many of those countries, and I know
most of the major cities intimately -- from Stockholm in the north,
Newcastle, London, Paris, The Hague, Munich, Vienna, to Rome and Erice,
Sicily in the south.  I have also spent several months in Moscow and in
Jerusalem as a guest of academic institutions.

*Economic Suicide*

The ongoing economic suicide of Europe is based on a faulty understanding
of the climate issue by most Western politicians and on their extreme
policy response, based on emotion rather than logic and science.  The major
European economies have reacted irrationally to contrived, unjustified fear
of imagined global-warming disasters

Perhaps I should explain that the climate has not been warming for the past
18 years -- and even if it had been warming, it would be no disaster.  The
EU wants to cut emissions of the greenhouse gas carbon dioxide, a natural
plant-fertilizer, by 40% within 15 years -- by 2030.  This insane drive to
replace energy sources from fossil fuels that release plant-friendly CO2
into the atmosphere has led to greatly increased costs of energy.  As is
well understood, such actions not only hurt economic growth, but they
increase poverty levels and therefore threaten the social fabric of these
nations.

There are some exceptions. of course: France and Belgium rely heavily on
nuclear energy; Austria and Norway rely heavily on hydro.  Poland has
actively resisted the general trend to demonize CO2, but the UK and
Germany, which has been the power-house of European economic growth, are
severely threatened by their insistence on installing wind and solar
energy.  The latter is especially inappropriate to the Continent and to
Great Britain.

The pity of it all is that these economic sacrifices in Western Europe will
hardly affect the level of atmospheric CO2 -- which is controlled globally
by huge emissions from China -- and soon also from India.

Unfortunately, during the past few years, and even during the White House
administration of George W. Bush, the United States has tended to move in
the same direction -- and energy costs have gone up markedly.

The regulatory burdens created by the EPA’s “War on Coal,” by holding up
permits for pipelines and for exploration-production of fuels on Federal
lands, etc, are imposing real costs on US households, which are the
equivalent of a large energy tax -- except that none of these increased
costs flow into the US Treasury.

*Cultural, plus even more dangerous Demographic Suicide,*

But it is cultural suicide, which adds to economic suicide and spells doom
for the future of Western Europe.  I have in mind here the heavy
immigration from Islamic nations -- with most immigrants unwilling to
adjust to the prevailing culture of the host country.

Examples are rampant.  In Great Britain, the dangerous immigration has come
mostly from Pakistan and Bangladesh, Islamic successors to the British rule
over India; Hindu immigrants present no special problem.  In Southern
Europe, the Low Countries, and most of Scandinavia, much of the immigration
has been from Somalia and North Africa.  France has experienced massive
immigration from North Africa and other African French-speaking former
colonies.

In many of these nations now, these immigrant communities have formed
enclaves that the native inhabitants can no longer enter safely; even the
police have great difficulty controlling law and order in these enclaves.
Examples exist in cities like Birmingham, Amsterdam, Malmo (Sweden), Paris
and Marseille.  Germany seems slightly better off, with immigrants from
Turkey making some effort to become good Germans.  Of course, the aim of
many in these enclaves is to take over the host country -- using available
democratic means -- and institute Sharia (Islamic law).

It is clear that these immigrants are taking advantage of the democratic
nature of the host nations and their willingness to grant asylum status and
lavish economic subsidies to any who declare themselves as refugees.  A
prime example is Sweden, where multi-culturalism runs wild and is supported
by the government-subsidized and beholden media.  So far, no real revolt
yet -- except for some grumbling from the indigenous population (whom the
compliant media denounce as “racists.”)

Least affected have been the Slavic nations, which were formerly under
Soviet domination.  Perhaps because of their delayed economic development,
they have not been as attractive a destination for immigrants.  Ironically,
these East-Europeans may yet save Western civilization.

The United States faces a rather special situation.  There is much
immigration, mostly illegal, from south of the border. But these Latino
immigrants are not Islamic; they share similar cultural values with
native-born Americans -- and most are making an effort to adapt to the
prevailing culture.  The main danger is one of national security.  With
porous borders, potential terrorists can easily slip into the United States
and create mayhem.

A peculiar problem exists in Israel, which has experienced illegal Islamic
(!) immigration, mainly from Sudan and Eritrea.  We are told that some
southern suburbs of Tel Aviv now resemble a Third-World nation.  Efforts
are underway to deport these illegal immigrants; but standing in the way is
Israel’s Supreme Court, a group of unelected liberal lawyers, who
personally oppose the Parliament-passed law of deportation -- certainly an
anomalous situation by US standards.

Russia has experienced problems of its own, mainly from Islamic provinces
in the Caucasus.  The suppression of the Chechen revolt has caused a
violent reaction, leading to major terror acts, even in Moscow.

Exacerbating the Islamic “conquest“ of Western Europe is the fact that the
indigenous people -- from Swedes to Spaniards  -- are not reproducing
themselves.  Whatever the cause may be, the number of children per family
is well below the replacement level of 2.11; in some countries it is as low
as 1.30.  The statistics are frightening -- as seen in records of births,
welfare rolls, and school attendance.  By mid-century, parts of Europe will
have a Moslem majority -- and even before then it will be too late to
rectify the situation.

*What of the future?  *

With ongoing internal battles within Islamic groups, it is not easy to
predict the future.  In Syria, some 200,000 have been killed and millions
have been turned into refugees.  The rise of the “Islamic State” in the
last few months promises a brutal suppression of any who hold even a
slightly different Islamic view.  Their announced goal is to set up a
theocratic Caliphate in any lands that have ever been under Islamic rule --
including most of the Balkans, Andalus-Spain, and of course Israel.

At the battle of Tours in 732, Charles Martell stopped the advance into
France of Moslem armies from the Iberian peninsula.  In 1571, in the great
naval battle of Lepanto, off Greece, a Spanish-Italian fleet defeated the
Turks.  In their farthest advance into Central Europe, a Turkish army
besieged Vienna in 1683.  Christian forces, under the command of King John
Sobieski of Poland, defeated the invaders decisively and saved Western
civilization.

Americans have twice saved Europe in the 20th century and may soon be
forced to defend Europe again against a new threat.  The first assault on
Western European civilization came from Nazi Germany and its allies; it
took a bloody World-War-II (1939-1945) to defeat them.  Certainly, without
US intervention, Western Europe, and even Britain, might now be part of a
German-ruled dictatorship, a sort of involuntary European Union.  It is
doubtful also whether the Soviet Union could have withstood Hitler’s
onslaught without the active material assistance of the United States.

The second threat to Europe came from the post-1945 Soviet Union; it was
dominated by the specter of ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons.  The
“Warsaw Pact” encompassed even a large part of Germany.  This “Cold-War”
threat was neutralized thanks to the steadfastness of the United States --
but also by the internal economic problems brought about by the planned
economy of the Soviet empire.

The new threat of course is Islamo-Fascism and its aim to introduce Sharia
-- in at least those parts of Europe that had been Muslim lands in the
past, but aiming really at all of Europe -- and eventually the rest of the
world.  This new threat uses a method of warfare that is different from the
past and more insidious.  Terrorism has come into its own, partly based on
large Islamic populations in Western Europe.

Coupled with this external threat is the internal one from Islamic
fanatics, many of them born in Europe -- and even from converts.  We have
seen this happen in Spain, and more recently in Britain.  Their methods
have been crude and their weapons have been primitive; but with nuclear
proliferation and with the possibility of chemical and biological warfare,
these threats have to be taken very seriously.

Fighting these threats takes resources for surveillance, intelligence,
sundry military expenditures, and weapons, both offensive and defensive.
Resilience requires above all a strong economy.  And one cannot have a
strong economy without adequate energy resources – which gets us back to
the issue of climate fears.

The problem now is that while the threat of terrorism is growing, so is the
suicidal drive to limit the use of energy and thereby also economic
growth.  This internal threat is particularly strong in Europe and has been
called, quite properly, eco-Bolshevism.  It would have all the earmarks of
the failed Soviet system, with government involvement in every facet of the
economy and with energy restrictions reducing economic growth.

There is no question that the policies being discussed now in Europe and in
the United States would be extremely costly, would force industrial
cutbacks and of course massive job losses.  All of these exacerbate social
tension in nations that have a large number of immigrants, who
traditionally have the highest unemployment levels.

*Will the US step up again and save Europe?  Doubtful*

One may ask: Is there any way to stop this steamroller?  There’s probably
little hope that such an initiative can come from Europe; it may have to
come from the United States.  Somehow we would have to convince European
leaders that their policies, based on global-warming fears, are mistaken.
That job may prove to be very difficult -- unless there is a drastic change
in current US policy.  But it is something that has to be done if we want
Europe to survive economically, as an ally against the threat of
Islamo-Fascism.

I don’t believe that the US is prepared to save Europe; just listen to our
Secretary of State:  Speaking in Boston on Oct 9,  John Kerry pronounced
that climate change, if left unaddressed, will result in the end of times:
“Life as you know it on Earth ends,” Kerry said.  Last February, Kerry
claimed that climate change was the world’s “most fearsome weapon of mass
destruction.”  Not nuclear bombs in the hands of the terrorist-sponsoring
regime of Iran -- or in the hands of ISIS or al Qaeda; not Ebola or some
fearsome epidemic of a lethal disease.  According to Kerry, climate change
is the real number-one national-security threat.

US media, academia, and other opinion-makers are chiming in.  In her latest
work of science-fiction, Harvard’s Naomi Oreskes, co-author of the
mendacious *Merchants of Doubt*, imagines a future world devastated by
climate change.  She generously gives the West another 80 years -- well
beyond her own life span, of course.  But she totally ignores the dangers
of rising Islamo-Fascism and of demography.  Just listen:

*The year is 2393, and the world is almost unrecognizable. Clear warnings
of climate catastrophe went ignored for decades, leading to soaring
temperatures, rising sea levels, widespread drought and -- finally -- the
disaster now known as the Great Collapse of 2093, when the disintegration
of the West Antarctica Ice Sheet led to mass migration and a complete
reshuffling of the global order. Writing from the Second People's Republic
of China on the 300th anniversary of the Great Collapse, a senior scholar
presents a gripping and deeply disturbing account of how the children of
the Enlightenment -- the political and economic elites of the so-called
advanced industrial societies -- failed to act, and so brought about the
collapse of Western civilization. *

So don’t look to the US to come to the rescue of a doomed Western Europe.
It is unlikely that our children or grandchildren will be fortunate enough
to experience the charms of great cities like London, Paris, Amsterdam, and
Rome – or what’s left of them.

*S. Fred Singer is professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and
director of the Science & Environmental Policy Project.  His specialty is
atmospheric and space physics.  An expert in remote sensing and satellites,
he served as the founding director of the US Weather Satellite Service and,
more recently, as vice chair of the US National Advisory Committee on
Oceans & Atmosphere.  He is a senior fellow of the Heartland Institute and
the Independent Institute.  He co-authored the* *NY Times*
*best-seller **Unstoppable
Global Warming: Every 1500 years.  In 2007, he founded and has since
chaired the NIPCC (Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change),
which has released several scientific reports [See **www.NIPCCreport.org*
<http://www.nipccreport.org/>*].    For recent writings, see* *http*
<http://www.americanthinker.com/s_fred_singer/>
*://www.americanthinker.com/s_fred_singer/*
<http://www.americanthinker.com/s_fred_singer/> *and also Google Scholar*


__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmM2k0MGpiBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MTYxNjcxMDY->


 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDJvczV2BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQxNjE2NzEwNg-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to