http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/14/opinion/islams-problem-with-blasphemy.html?emc=edit_th_20150114&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=19466640



Islam’s Problem With Blasphemy



WILL “moderate Muslims” finally “speak up” against their militant
coreligionists? People around the world have asked (but, as in the past,
have not all seriously examined) this question since last week’s horrific
attacks on the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo and on a kosher
supermarket in Paris.



In fact, Muslim statesmen, clerics and intellectuals have added their
voices to condemnations of terror by leaders around the world. But they
must undertake another essential task: Address and reinterpret Islam’s
traditional take on “blasphemy,” or insult to the sacred.



The Paris terrorists were apparently fueled by the zeal to punish
blasphemy, and fervor for the same cause has bred militancy in the name of
Islam in various other incidents, ranging from Ayatollah Ruhollah
Khomeini’s fatwa against the writer Salman Rushdie in 1989 to the threats
and protests against the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten for publishing
cartoons lampooning the Prophet Muhammad in 2005.



Mockery of Muhammad, actual or perceived, has been at the heart of nearly
all of these controversies over blasphemy.



This might seem unremarkable at first, but there is something curious about
it, for the Prophet Muhammad is not the only sacred figure in Islam. The
Quran praises other prophets — such as Abraham, Moses and Jesus — and even
tells Muslims to “make no distinction” between these messengers of God. Yet
for some reason, Islamist extremists seem to obsess only about the Prophet
Muhammad.



Even more curiously, mockery of God — what one would expect to see as the
most outrageous blasphemy — seems to have escaped their attention as well.
Satirical magazines such as Charlie Hebdo have run cartoons ridiculing God
(in the Jewish, Christian and Muslim contexts), but they were targeted with
violence only when they ridiculed the Prophet Muhammad.



Of course, this is not to say extremists should threaten and harm
cartoonists for more diverse theological reasons; obviously, they should
not target them at all. But the exclusive focus on the Prophet Muhammad is
worth pondering. One obvious explanation is that while God and the other
prophets are also sacred for Judaism and Christianity, the Prophet Muhammad
is sacred only for Muslims. In other words, the zeal comes not from merely
respect for the sacred, but from militancy for what’s sacred to us — us
being the community of Muslims. So the unique sensitivity around Muhammad
seems to be a case of religious nationalism, with its focus on the earthly
community — rather than of true faith, whose main focus should be the
divine.



Still, this religious nationalism is guided by religious law — Shariah —
that includes clauses about punishing blasphemy as a deadly sin. It is thus
of vital importance that Muslim scholars courageously, even audaciously,
address this issue today. They can begin by acknowledging that, while
Shariah is rooted in the divine, the overwhelming majority of its
injunctions are man-made, partly reflecting the values and needs of the
seventh to 12th centuries — when no part of the world was liberal, and
other religions, such as Christianity, also considered blasphemy a capital
crime.



The only source in Islamic law that all Muslims accept indisputably is the
Quran. And, conspicuously, the Quran decrees no earthly punishment for
blasphemy — or for apostasy (abandonment or renunciation of the faith), a
related concept. Nor, for that matter, does the Quran command stoning,
female circumcision or a ban on fine arts. All these doctrinal innovations,
as it were, were brought into the literature of Islam as medieval scholars
interpreted it, according to the norms of their time and milieu.



Tellingly, severe punishments for blasphemy and apostasy appeared when
increasingly despotic Muslim empires needed to find a religious
justification to eliminate political opponents.



One of the earliest “blasphemers” in Islam was the pious scholar Ghaylan
al-Dimashqi, who was executed in the 8th century by the Umayyad Empire. His
main “heresy” was to insist that rulers did not have the right to regard
their power as “a gift of God,” and that they had to be aware of their
responsibility to the people.



Before all that politically motivated expansion and toughening of Shariah,
though, the Quran told early Muslims, who routinely faced the mockery of
their faith by pagans: “God has told you in the Book that when you hear
God’s revelations disbelieved in and mocked at, do not sit with them until
they enter into some other discourse; surely then you would be like them.”



Just “do not sit with them” — that is the response the Quran suggests for
mockery. Not violence. Not even censorship.



Wise Muslim religious leaders from the entire world would do Islam a great
favor if they preached and reiterated such a nonviolent and nonoppressive
stance in the face of insults against Islam. That sort of instruction could
also help their more intolerant coreligionists understand that rage is a
sign of nothing but immaturity. The power of any faith comes not from its
coercion of critics and dissenters. It comes from the moral integrity and
the intellectual strength of its believers.




__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMDk5bnNuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjEyNjIyOTc->

   - New Members
   
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnN2luOTE1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDIxMjYyMjk3>
   1

 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMDJqbTA3BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyMTI2MjI5Nw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to