http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stories/DN-viard_30edi.ART.State.Edition1.4abd098.html
American Enterprise Institute: What's really wrong with Obama tax plan

12:00 AM CDT on Thursday, October 30, 2008

Alan D. Viard is a resident scholar and Alex Brill is a research
fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. Arthur C. Brooks will
become president of AEI on Jan. 1.

We've heard a lot this month about how Sen. Barack Obama's tax plans
would affect Joe the Plumber – the Ohio man who recently asked the
Democratic nominee whether he planned to raise his taxes. The entire
episode has only added to the confusion over what Mr. Obama is
proposing for middle-class taxes. How should an honest fiscal
conservative see the situation? For those making less than roughly
$200,000 ($250,000 for couples), Mr. Obama would not only make
President Bush's tax cuts permanent but would also offer an array of
new tax credits.

These "tax cuts" contain some sleight of hand. More than $400 billion
of the money over the next 10 years would take the form of refundable
tax credits paid to people who already pay no federal income tax. And
the cuts would put more money in the pockets of some families.

Who can be against a boost to spending power and consumption? We can.

While a few of Mr. Obama's proposals may be sensible, the overall
package would be bad for the economy. Unlike rate cuts for high
incomes or reductions in investment taxes, most of his proposed tax
cuts would do little to reduce the tax penalty on work and saving. For
some households, the penalty on work and saving would increase because
the new tax credits would be phased out as income rises. These
proposals wouldn't deliver the economic growth that incentive-based
tax cuts would.

Furthermore, there is no free lunch. This middle-class tax relief
would have to be paid for. Middle-class tax cuts might make sense if
they were paid for by spending cuts, but that is not Mr. Obama's plan.
Like his opponent, Mr. Obama points to vague savings from reducing
waste, the kind of savings that never seem to materialize. He also
hopes to reap savings by accelerating our redeployment from Iraq, a
project with an uncertain fiscal impact.

At the same time, he proposes a wave of new spending on health care,
education, energy and infrastructure programs and declares his
opposition to reforms that would reduce the growth of Social Security
and other entitlement benefits.

So where would the money come from for the tax cuts and new spending?
Largely from raising other taxes: the ones that have the biggest
impact on economic growth. Mr. Obama would let key parts of the Bush
tax cuts expire, causing the top tax rate on ordinary income to go
back to 39.6 percent, up from 35 percent today. The capital gains and
dividend tax rates would rise to 20 percent from today's 15 percent.
Mr. Obama might also impose Social Security tax at a rate of up to 4
percent on wages and self-employment income above $250,000, starting
in 2019.

If rewards for entrepreneurs and firms are reduced through higher
marginal tax rates, incentives to earn, invest and create jobs will be
diminished. Americans will have less incentive to save, and firms will
have less incentive to pay dividends. Tax avoidance will become more
profitable. A smaller capital stock will mean a less productive
economy and lower wages for middle-class and other workers. These
disincentive effects also mean that the revenue gain is likely to be
smaller than Mr. Obama envisions.

In sum, Mr. Obama may very well give Joe the Plumber a tax break, but
only if Joe does not become too successful. He is offering real tax
favors for the middle class, but not real benefits for the economy.

Alan D. Viard is a resident scholar and Alex Brill is a research
fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. Arthur C. Brooks will
become president of AEI on Jan. 1.

WHO else will be on your ballot? Find out, and read their answers to
our questionnaire. dallasnews.com/voterguide
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to