http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/03/the_bergdahl_fiasco.html



March 25, 2015
The Bergdahl Fiasco

By Jonathan Keiler <http://www.americanthinker.com/author/jonathan_keiler/>

The languishing case of Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl continues to raise
serious questions about whether the Obama administration is illegally
influencing the military justice system. It would not be the first time
either, as Obama’s political views on Islam clearly prejudiced and dragged
out the prosecution of former Major Nidal Hassan, the Fort Hood
terrorist. Both cases bear the marks of improper “command influence” on the
military. This is most clearly evident in the tormented and confusing
delays in processing both cases, reflective of the Army’s struggle to
maintain at least a veneer of objectivity, while marching to Obama’s tune.

The case against Hasan was cut and dried, but dragged out over two years,
at great cost to the victims, the military and the country at large. Hasan
was willing to plead guilty
<http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/15/13299644-nidal-hasan-barred-from-pleading-guilty-to-murder-in-2009-fort-hood-shooting>
to a terror killing early on, but such a plea would have undermined the
Army/Obama narrative that the killings were not an act of Islamist terror,
but rather “workplace violence.” To accept a plea from Hasan, a military
court would have had to hear from Hasan’s own mouth how and why he
committed the Fort Hood murders. During this “allocution” Hasan would have
undoubtedly announced that he committed the massacre as a “soldier of
Allah” just as his business cards stated. Thus, began the ordeal to bring
Hasan to a contested trial on the thin grounds that he face the death
penalty, making a guilty plea unacceptable. This begged the questions why
first, a mere act of “workplace violence” merited the maximum penalty, and
second, why getting Hasan the death penalty was at all meaningful, given
that he will almost certainly never be executed -- the military not having
executed anyone in over fifty years
<http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/us-military-death-penalty>. Ironically,
Hasan successfully frustrated the Army’s efforts, firing his
attorneys, representing
himself
<http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/08/ft-hood-shooter-back-in-court-after-military-judge-considers-death-wish/>,
and in the end essentially confessing to the terror act, despite the Army’s
best efforts to stop him.

In the Bergdahl case, something similar is happening, though the legal
tactics have changed. It is hard to know exactly what is going on, as the
Army has effectively stonewalled both the press and Congress. In January,
on FOX television’s “The O’Reilly Factor” retired Army Lieutenant Colonel
Tony Shaffer claimed
<http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/01/28/bergdahl-to-be-charged-with-desertion-ex-military-intel-officer-says/>
that reliable sources told him that Bergdahl would be charged with
desertion, though the Army was quick to deny
<http://money.cnn.com/2015/01/27/media/fox-nbc-bergdahl-story/> that. Last
week on the same program, Shaffer backtracked, and opined that the reason
for the delay is that the Army wants Bergdahl to plead guilty
<http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Tony-Shaffer-Bowe-Bergdahl-plead-charge/2015/03/18/id/631046/>
to something less than the maximum offense -- desertion in the face of the
enemy -- in order to spare the Obama administration the embarrassment of
having freed a gaggle of terrorists on his behalf, and feting him and his
family as heroes upon his release. This seems to be much more likely, both
explaining the delay, and also better fitting President Obama’s agenda,
even though that is not supposed to factor at all in military justice
deliberations.

But again, the soldier is not cooperating.  Bergdahl is well represented
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/07/16/bowe-bergdahl-lawyer_n_5592181.html?>and
clearly listening to his attorneys, who probably feel that they can beat
the most serious potential charges at trial, and at worst see their client
convicted of the minor offenses to which the Army wants him to plead
now. This gives Bergdahl little incentive to cop a plea, especially if it
would put his eligibility for back pay -- and his ability to pay his
attorneys’ fees -- at risk.

But really, it appears to be even worse than that. Bergdahl has yet to even
be charged. So the Army is negotiating a potential plea deal based on
potential charges, a ludicrous situation. Why should Bergdahl enter a plea
based on nebulous charges that the Army’s convening authority cannot seem
to bring himself to execute? Indeed, his attorneys would almost be
committing malpractice were they to argue to Bergdahl that he agree to
plead guilty to charges that have yet to be formally preferred to a courts
martial.

The Army is negotiating with Bergdahl the way Obama is negotiating with
Iran. Iran knows it can walk away from negotiations because Secretary of
State John Kerry will beg them to return and offer incentives if they do.
Bergdahl’s attorneys likewise will string the Army along indefinitely if
they believe that the Army wants a plea deal more than they do. As long as
the Army dithers, their client is remains free. Plus, public expectations
and emotions wither, including within the potential military jury pool.
And finally, one never knows, as things drag on, whether witnesses and
evidence way be lost or otherwise compromised. Delay almost always assists
the defense, and the Army is giving Bergdahl and his team a big assist
right now. His attorneys would be foolish not to take it.

It’s true that occasionally an accused person will enter a plea before
being charged, but in those cases usually there is either overwhelming
evidence against the defendant, or the defendant feels guilty and has an
emotional and/or moral need to confess. Neither situation pertains in
Bergdahl’s situation. His case could be a difficult one for the Army to
prove, and he has not evinced a whit of regret or remorse for his actions.
He has allowed himself to be portrayed as a victim, and a patriotic soldier
still willing to serve his country. At least according to Lieutenant
Colonel Shaffer, the “intelligence” Bergdahl supplied to the Army during
his single lawyered-up interview proved to be “garbage
<http://www.breitbart.com/video/2015/03/18/report-bergdahl-defense-team-being-pressured-to-cop-a-plea/>.”
That won’t cause him or his attorneys to alter the narrative of a patriotic
victim, just what the Obama team wants. And the Army is playing along. It
is not pressuring Bergdahl or his attorneys in any meaningful way to back
off that story, because that would make it more difficult for them to sell
the easy plea deal they want Bergdahl to sign.

This is such a despicable and obvious case of political maneuvering that,
taken in conjunction with Hasan’s bungled prosecution, it’s hard to see how
the military justice system survives undamaged. It’s yet another critical
facet of this great republic that Obama will cynically destroy. Not because
he even thought enough about it to bother, but simply to avoid another
political embarrassment and bolster his soft policy on Islamist terror.
Sadly, the Army is complicit, and thus will undermine not only its own
system of justice, but the institution itself.


__._,_.___
 ------------------------------
Posted by: "beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


 Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZnRucXJsBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0MjczMDMwNTA->

   - New Members
   
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJnNzhlZ3FzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDI3MzAzMDUw>
   1

 [image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbDI4MTFhBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQyNzMwMzA1MA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to