Socialism and everyone and everything connected to it is repugnant. It is also anti-American, un-American, subversive, and almost traitorious.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:56 PM, Lone Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > American thinker. A compendium of scawlings by low life gutter trash > > On Oct 31, 10:02 am, Travis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: *Travis* > > Date: Thu, Oct 30, 2008 > > Subject: The Repugnance of Socialism > > > > Too bad this type of common sense is not more common. > > > > B > > > > http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/the_repugnance_of_socialism.html > > > > October 30, 2008 The Repugnance of Socialism*By* *Kyle-Anne > > Shiver*<http://www.americanthinker.com/kyleanne_shiver/> > > > > "The worst difficulties from which we suffer do not come from without. > They > > come from within...They come from a peculiar type of brainy people, > always > > found in our country, who if they add something to our culture, take much > > from its strength. Our difficulties come from the mood of unwarrantable > > self-abasement into which we have been cast by a powerful section of our > own > > intellectuals." > > - Winston Churchill, on Leftists > > > > Earlier this year I read a column in which the writer rejoiced because > the > > word, "socialism," is no longer a scary bogeyman to Americans. When I > > Googled the writer and learned he was only 31 and graduated from > Columbia, > > it wasn't hard to figure out how he got it all wrong. > > > > Since he had clearly been taught our "revised" history -- the one that > > glosses over the 100,000,000-grave killing fields of the communists and > > makes high drama out of the "sufferings" of the Hollywood blacklisted and > > the McCarthy hearings -- he didn't have a clue about what actually > > happened. This pitiful, Ivy-League indoctrinated writer had reached the > > false conclusion that Americans used to be scared down to their woolies > of > > the big bad commies, but weren't anymore. > > > > *Isn't it hard to believe that reasonably intelligent parents actually > pay > > big bucks for those fancy degrees in poppycock?* > > > > Americans weren't *scared* of socialism, silly. They found it > *viscerally > > repugnant.* > > > > *One must never mistake repugnance for fear. The first is based upon > > reason, the latter upon emotion.* > > > > And the reasons for loathing socialism are as clear as the nose on > anyone's > > face. > > > > No fully-grown human being with a single ounce of self-respect *ever* > *wants > > * to be taken care of by others. No person with dignity will tolerate > being > > told what to do, what to think, how to work or how to be an "acceptable" > > person. No free man or woman will tolerate the loss of liberty in > exchange > > for material comfort. > > > > Many generations of Americans vehemently rejected these notions over and > > over again, not out of fear, but out of the kind of visceral loathing > that > > makes a normal person wretch, gag and grab for his religion and his guns. > > > > *The Lure of the Nanny State* > > > > "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its > > victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under > robber > > barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty > > may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but > those > > who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do > so > > with the approval of their own conscience." > > - C. S. Lewis > > > > A great many Americans -- perhaps even a majority -- seem poised to hand > > over vast amounts of their hard-earned money and their hard-won liberties > to > > the promised "collective > > redemption"< > http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/obamas_politics_of_collective... > .>being > > offered by Barack Obama and his socialist band of "progressives" in > > Congress. With the votes of nanny-state supporters from all classes > among > > us, their utopian dreams will be put to the test on our own ground and > the > > reach of our federal government will be expanded drastically according to > > their plans. > > > > But how does this really play out? > > > > *Always and everywhere it is tried.* > > > > *The Socialist's Lure* > > > > One of the simplest realities of life is that the person who pays the > bill > > is the one who makes the decisions. When that person is you, you decide. > > When the payer is a state collective, the collective decides. And you > > obey. > > > > *This ain't rocket science. The freedom to decide is the reason all > > children finally leave the security of the nest and jump to the ground. > > It's innate. This will to be free. To decide for oneself.* > > > > Consider only these 3 areas of Obama's collective plan for the redemption > of > > American society: > > > > - Obama wants to use a lot of taxpayer money to offer education to > > children from birth through college. Free to mommies and daddies. On > the > > taxpayer dollar, rather than on the parents'. > > > > The socialist lure: Give the state your children and the state will > relieve > > you of the burden of educating them and teaching them values and > knowledge. > > Parents, you're off the hook. > > > > The result: The state then makes all the decisions about what your > children > > will be taught, how they will be brought up, what knowledge is important > and > > what is not. > > > > - Obama wants to bring the federal government's involvement into > > healthcare to an unprecedented level. > > > > The socialist lure: Give the state your money and the power to enforce > > healthcare for all, and the collective state will relieve you of your > > responsibility to provide this service for yourselves and your children. > > > > The result: The state makes healthcare decisions. Healthcare is then > > rationed according to need, as decided by the state. > > > > - Obama wants to enshrine positive rights to all citizens that include > a > > guaranteed "living wage" to all regardless of individual work. > > > > The socialist lure: No citizen will be without the means to live a > fairly > > equitable life regardless of individual delinquency or extra effort. > > > > The result: The poor and unfortunate become wards of the state and > vastly > > increase in number. Work incentives plummet. > > > > - Obama wants our politics to be nice, not mean or divisive. He wants > > unity. He wants us all to get along. > > > > The socialist lure: Peace. Harmony. Goodwill to all. No good guys and > > bad guys. All will be nice and we will sing Kumbayah in perfect harmony > all > > over the world. > > > > The result: Anyone who dissents, who finds error, who sees things > > differently will be silenced. This is the only way collectives ever > enforce > > their ideas of "unity." > > > > Progress? In the memorable words of C. S. Lewis: > > > > "We all want progress, but if you're on the wrong road, progress means > > doing an about-turn and walking back to the right road; in that case, the > > man who turns back soonest is the most progressive." > > > > *Freedom and individual responsibility are inseparable.* > > > > The choice we are facing in this election is simple. We have freedom > only > > when we accept personal responsibility for ourselves and our children. > If > > we want to divest ourselves from the responsibility to provide for > > ourselves, then we also forfeit our freedom to make our own decisions. > > > > Great leaders have appeared from time to time to warn free people of the > > innate deceptiveness of the socialists' lures. Ronald Reagan saw the > evil > > as clear as day. Reagan's "ten scariest words in the English language": > > > > "I'm from the government and I'm here to help you." > > > > Winston Churchill expounded further on leftist ideology: > > > > "Let them quit these gospels of envy, hate and malice. Let them > eliminate > > them from their politics and programmes. Let them abandon the utter > > fallacy, the grotesque, erroneous fatal blunder of believing that by > > limiting the enterprise of man, by riveting the shackles of a false > > equality...they will increase the well-being of the world." > > > > John McCain is a leader in the same mold as Reagan and Churchill when it > > comes to seeing the innate evil within the Marist lure and its deceptive > > threat to real peace and any prosperity worth having. But of these three > -- > > Reagan, Churchill and McCain -- McCain is the only one who has seen > > firsthand, from the inside, how it is that collective regimes may appear > > fair and just and unified. > > > > McCain learned the hard way that socialist fairness is a carefully > > choreographed illusion, that socialist justice is a capricious commodity > > doled out on a whim by dictators with hard-core boots and clubs. > > > > Unity? Unity is obtained through coercive means and by taking children > very > > early into indoctrination as model, happy future workers for the > collective > > "good." > > > > So, Obama got his ideas by palling around with radical communist > > revolutionaries of the 60s. Obama chose these radicals as mentors and > > friends. Obama's own parents were from the same mold as well. Happy > > socialists all. > > > > John McCain spent a good deal of his adult life with radical socialists > > too. Five and a half years to be precise. Only McCain got his education > on > > the merits of communism from inside one of their "utopian" cells under > > force. > > > > Perhaps never before have Americans had such an easy choice for our next > > President. Here's hoping we've raised more freedom-loving patriots than > > fools. > > > > Or Obama's victory celebration may turn out to be the biggest April's > Fools > > Day we could have ever imagined. > > > > *Kyle-Anne Shiver is an independent journalist and a frequent contributor > to > > American Thinker. She blogs at commonsenseregained.com.* > > > > *Page Printed from: > http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/the_repugnance_of_socialism.html*at > > October 30, 2008 - 09:54:09 AM EDT > > > > __._,_.___ > > Messages< > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJmamR...> > > MARKETPLACE > > ------------------------------ > > From kitchen basics to easy recipes - join the Group from Kraft Foods > > <http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13rg3vto9/M=493064.12016295.13271503.1083.. > .> > > [image: Yahoo! Groups]< > http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlazZmb3RxBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl...> > > Change settings via the > > Web< > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJnMG9sbW4.. > .>(Yahoo! > > ID required) > > Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily > > Digest< > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:+Digest>| > > Switch > > format to Traditional< > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:+Traditional > > > > Visit Your Group > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport;_ylc=X3oDMTJlYmtmNHJkBF9T.. > .>| > > Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>| > Unsubscribe > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Recent Activity > > > > - 2 > > New Members< > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJndjlh...> > > > > Visit Your Group > > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/grendelreport;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcWRwMnE2BF9T.. > .> > > Yahoo! News > > > > Fashion News< > http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13osmprle/M=493064.12016309.12445701.8674...> > > > > What's the word on > > > > fashion and style? > > Best of Y! Groups > > > > Discover groups< > http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13o7hj772/M=493064.12016306.12445698.8674...> > > > > that are the best > > > > of their class. > > Weight Loss Group > > > > on Yahoo! Groups< > http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13p3kisah/M=493064.12016300.12445692.1132...> > > > > Get support and > > > > make friends online. > > . > > > > __,_._,___ > > > > -- > > *~@):~{> > > > > -- > > *~@):~{> > > > -- *~@):~{> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
