Jimmy Carter did that while there was a hostage situation!!! There has been a huge wave of "refugees" since the US took out Saddam!!!
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 4:41 AM, Hot4azintop via PoliticalForum < [email protected]> wrote: > Don't forget Jimmy Carter forbad Persans from Iran o enter the country and > there was no big debate about that as I recall. What's going on in America > and with these self destructive Liberals urging America to commit cultural > suicide these days...... > > In a message dated 12/10/2015 9:11:50 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > The answer is 0........ > > In a message dated 12/9/2015 10:29:52 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > How many Japanese or Germans immigrated into the US during WWII? > --- > In 1988, President Ronald Reagan > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan> signed into law the Civil > Liberties Act <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Liberties_Act_of_1988>, > which apologized for the internment on behalf of theU.S. government > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_government_of_the_United_States> and > authorized a payment of $20,000 to each individual camp survivor. The > legislation admitted that government actions were based on "race prejudice, > war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership."[17] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Japanese_Americans#cite_note-17> > The > U.S. government eventually disbursed more than $1.6 billion in reparations > to 82,219 Japanese Americans who had been interned and their heirs > <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/heir>.[16] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Japanese_Americans#cite_note-CLA1988-Yamato-16> > [18] > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Japanese_Americans#cite_note-democracynow-18> > > On Wednesday, December 9, 2015 at 2:31:06 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Yes, he is. How many Japanese or Germans immigrated into the US during >> WWII? >> >> >> >> B >> >> >> >> >> http://www.gopusa.com/theloft/2015/12/09/is-trump-right-about-halting-muslim-immigration/?subscriber=1 >> >> >> Is Trump right about halting Muslim immigration? >> >> *By Bobby Eberle* December 9, 2015 >> >> [image: >> http://www.gopusa.com/news/wp-content/blogs.dir/3/files/2015/12/tashfeen_malik.jpg] >> <http://www.gopusa.com/news/wp-content/blogs.dir/3/files/2015/12/tashfeen_malik.jpg>Donald >> Trump has spoken out, and his comments are the talk of the land. Whether >> one looks at the liberal media, the Democrats, the other GOP presidential >> contenders, or the GOP establishment in Washington, everyone is saying the >> exact same thing: Trump is wrong. Trump has crossed the line. Trump doesn't >> represent American values. But when we step back and look at the facts >> honestly, we have to ask ourselves: is Trump actually right? >> >> We no longer have to look back at September 11, 2001 as the last time >> Americans were attacked at home by radical Islamic terrorists. All we have >> to do is look back to last week. Islamic terrorists are striking all over >> the globe, and now they have struck again in America. In reaction to that >> attack (along with the recent Paris attack and countless others), Donald >> Trump called for a temporary ban on all Muslims entering the country. This >> is what he said: >> >> "Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims >> entering the United States until our representatives can figure out what >> the hell is going on. We have no choice." >> >> Enter the media firestorm and the parade of people coming out against >> Trump. Our new speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, spoke out against Trump. >> >> Ryan spoke of the virtues of Muslims, so that we won't think they are all >> terrorists. Barack Obama did the same thing in his Oval Office address. >> Rather than talk about how to keep us safe, Obama lectured Americans on the >> need for gun control (which would not have stopped these terrorists) and >> spoke on the importance of being nice to Muslims. Guess what? No one is >> lumping all Muslims in the same boat. No one is saying that! And yet Paul >> Ryan speaks about it. Obama speaks about it. And the entire left wing media >> is talking about it. >> >> On the homepage of CNN.com yesterday, the main headline was *The truth >> about Muslims in America >> <http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/08/us/muslims-in-america-shattering-misperception/index.html>*, >> a story which plays down their danger to America but also plays up their >> contributions. >> >> All of these people want to ignore the FACT that radical Islamic >> terrorists have just struck on American soil again. They want to ignore the >> FACT that ALL major terrorist attacks around the globe are being >> perpetrated by members of one type of religion. They also ignore the fact >> that radical Islam is not just a religion, but it is a political and >> governing way of life. Sharia law is incompatible with the American way of >> life and the American form of government. That's just a simple fact. >> >> So, here's a little refresher of what the media and even our own GOP >> leaders and candidates wont' tell you. First of all, there is this notion >> that Islamic radicals make up a very, very, very, very small percentage of >> all Muslims. Take a look at this video by Ben Shapiro: >> >> In summary, Ben notes that there are around 680 million radical muslims >> around the world and about 500,000 right here in America. These may not be >> terrorists, but they sympathize with the motives and means of the >> terrorists. >> >> A story from this summer which ran on *Breitbart.com >> <http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/06/24/shock-poll-51-of-american-muslims-want-sharia-25-okay-with-violence-against-americans/>* >> points out the results of a new poll of American Muslims. >> >> The results show that a startling number of American Muslims, our fellow >> citizens, agree that violence is a legitimate response to those who insult >> Islam. A full majority of 51% "agreed that "Muslims in America should have >> the choice of being governed according to shariah." >> >> A full 25% of those polled agreed that "violence against Americans here >> in the United States can be justified as part of the global jihad." >> >> For those who don't know, Sharia Law is nothing less than the >> Nazi-ification of a religion. Sharia authorizes murder against >> non-believers who won't convert, horrific oppression of women, the >> execution of gays, the extermination of Jews... >> >> So, 25% of those polled believe that violence against Americans can be >> justified?! And what are we doing about this? It seems like the media and >> GOP candidates are bending over backwards NOT to talk about it. Trump is >> the only candidate that is speaking about American safety. >> >> There are a few fundamental reasons why America is not just some loose >> collection of states. There are reasons why we drew up a Constitution and >> created a federal government. The NUMBER ONE reason is for the protection >> of American citizens. That is the main and most important function. And >> yet, there is only one person talking about it? Does anyone find that to be >> odd? >> >> Now, let's look at Trump's outrageous, racist, misguided, insane, >> out-of-line, over-the-top recommendation, and let's compare with other >> times America has been under attack. >> >> As noted by *Frontpage Mag >> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/261062/carter-banned-iranians-coming-us-during-hostage-daniel-greenfield>*, >> "During the Iranian hostage crisis, Carter issued a number of orders to put >> pressure on Iran. Among these, Iranians were banned from entering the >> United States unless they oppose the Shiite Islamist regime or had a >> medical emergency." Wow, liberal president Jimmy Carter proposed this? >> >> Here's Jimmy Carter saying it back in 1980. >> >> Fourth, the Secretary of Treasury [State] and the Attorney General will >> invalidate all visas issued to Iranian citizens for future entry into the >> United States, effective today. We will not reissue visas, nor will we >> issue new visas, except for compelling and proven humanitarian reasons or >> where the national interest of our own country requires. This directive >> will be interpreted very strictly. >> >> In another *Frontpage Mag >> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/261060/fdr-halted-german-japanese-naturalization-after-daniel-greenfield>* >> story, we learn that "after Pearl Harbor, the naturalization of enemy >> aliens was suspended for a time." >> >> The myth popularized by the left is that after Pearl Harbor the United >> States began randomly going after Japanese-Americans because of racism. The >> actual reality is that the United States began relocating "enemy aliens" in >> the West Coast, which meant Germans, Japanese and Italians who were not >> United States citizens. Race wasn't the issue. Fear of an invasion was. >> >> So... is Trump so wrong? >> >> In an article on *National Review >> <http://www.nationalreview.com/article/428201/donald-trump-muslim-immigration-policy-discussion?VlLUJdKW03eOEVuT.01>*, >> Andrew McCarthy actually points out that Trump's comments should "touch off >> a badly needed debate." >> >> The lack of separation between spiritual and civic life is not the only >> problem with Islam. Sharia is counter-constitutional in its most basic >> elements -- beginning with the elementary belief that people do not have a >> right to govern themselves freely. Islam, instead, requires adherence to >> sharia and rejection of all law that contradicts it. So we start with >> fundamental incompatibility, before we ever get to other aspects of sharia: >> its systematic discrimination against non-Muslims and women; its denial of >> religious liberty, free speech, economic freedom, privacy rights, due >> process, and protection from cruel and unusual punishments; and its >> endorsement of violent jihad in furtherance of protecting and expanding the >> territory it governs. >> >> Let's bear in mind that permitting immigration is a discretionary >> national act. There is no right to immigrate to the United States, and the >> United States has no obligation to accept immigrants from any country, >> including Muslim-majority countries. We could lawfully cut off all >> immigration, period, if we wanted to. Plus, it has always been a basic >> tenet of legal immigration to promote fidelity to the Constitution and >> assimilation into American society -- principles to which classical sharia >> is antithetical. >> >> So, was Trump out of line with his comments? If an American leader is >> truly concerned about the safety of the American people, doesn't it make >> sense to take a hard look at the immigration process? >> >> How about this... How about if we call for a two-year halt to ALL >> immigration from ANY country? As McCarthy noted there is no "right" for >> anyone to come here whenever he or she wants. It is up to America to let >> people in, and we are a country at war with radical Islamic terrorists. >> >> What if a candidate proposed a two-year timeout on immigration so that >> America can secure its northern and southern borders, review the visa >> process that so many terrorists have abused in the past, and come up with >> new policies for who can actually come into this country. To appease the >> left and the weak GOP establishment, the timeout would apply to all races, >> nationalities, etc. We wouldn't want to offend those trying to kill us, >> would we? >> >> In a world where radical Islamic terrorists are trying to kill us, >> doesn't that proposal make sense? And yet, there is only one candidate who >> is talking about American safety and security, and that candidate is >> getting attacked from all sides. >> >> I saw Islamic terrorists kill Americans. I saw Flight 77 fly overhead and >> crash into the Pentagon. I saw the explosion that killed innocent >> Americans. I don't want to see it again... ever! So, rather than the media >> or Paul Ryan or the Young Republicans (who sent out an e-mail denouncing >> Trump's comments) or the establishment GOP coming out and continuing to >> tell us that not all Muslims are bad, when are we going to hear some real >> plans about dealing with the ones who are trying to kill us? >> >> VN:D [1.9.6_1107] >> >> *Rate this post:* >> >> >> >> >> __._,_.___ >> ------------------------------ >> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> Visit Your Group >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdjA1ZXRzBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NDk2NzkxMTE-> >> >> >> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlanY5MXMwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ0OTY3OTExMQ--> >> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >> >> __,_._,___ >> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > <http://www.politicalforum.com/> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- brine http://brineb.blogspot.com/ -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
