December 17, 2015

*Bergdahl Court Martial also Indicts Obama*

By Daniel John Sobieski
<http://www.americanthinker.com/author/daniel_john_sobieski/>

The decision to refer the case of Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl to a general court
martial on charges of desertion by Gen. Robert B. Abrams, the head of Army
Forces Command at Ft. Bragg, N.C., shows there remains at least one general
not cowed by President Obama’s purge of command officers
<http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/102913-677116-197-military-officers-purged-by-obama.htm?ntt=obama%20military%20purge>
deemed insufficiently subservient to his policies of appeasement and
unilateral disarmament. As Breitbart reported
<http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/12/14/bowe-bergdahl-referred-court-martial/>
:

Bergdahl, who was kidnapped by the Taliban following his abandonment of a
forward operating base in Afghanistan, was charged this year with desertion
and misbehavior before the enemy. If charged with the latter, he could
potentially face life in prison. If charged with only desertion, he faces a
maximum penalty of five years in prison.

I hope that he will face life in prison and is lucky a firing squad is not
in the cards. It was not what President Obama, who welcomed the parents
<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2644788/US-solider-freed-captivity-Afghanistan.html>
of deserter Bergdahl to the White House Rose Garden to cheer the alleged
good news of the return of the deserter six other soldiers died looking
for, wanted to hear. President Obama, who said we traded five Taliban
commanders for Bergdahl because we leave no soldier behind, has had no
regrets about leaving former Marine Amir Hekmati
<http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/040715-746803-marine-amir-hekmati-jailed-in-iran.htm?ntt=Amir%20Herkmati>
a prisoner in Iran. Nor did he raise a finger as Andrew Tahmooressi
<http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/070314-707484-tahmooressi-still-jailed-on-fourth-of-july.htm?ntt=Bowe%20Bergdahl%20deserter>
was left to rot in a Mexican prison for taking the wrong exit.

That Bergdahl was a deserter and a traitor should never have been in doubt,
yet it was, partially due to President Obama sending National Security
Adviser Susan Rice, who spread the Benghazi video lies on the Sunday talk
show circuit, to appear on the June 1, 2014 broadcast of ABC’s “This Week
to tell two more lies, that Bergdahl was a good soldier and that trading
five top Taliban commanders would not endanger U.S. security. As Breitbart
reported:

Regarding the desertion allegations, she said Bergdahl, “served the United
States with honor and distinction. And we’ll have the opportunity
eventually to learn what has transpired in the past years.”

Rice also said that “assurances relating to the movement, the activities,
the monitoring of those detainees [released in exchange for Bergdahl] give
us confidence that they cannot and, in all likelihood, will not pose a
significant risk to the United States. And that it is in our national
interests that this transfer had been made.”

In fact, the Taliban trade of the terrorist equivalent of four-star
generals does and has jeopardized U.S. security and was done to exploit
Bergdahl’s captivity to help Obama to get the worst of the worst out of
Guantanamo to facilitate his campaign pledge of closing the facility. That
Bergdahl was a deserter should never have been in doubt, judging by the
universal condemnation of those who served with him. *Investor’s Business
Daily
<http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/101514-721987-army-refuses-to-release-bergdahl-findings.htm?p=2>*
(IBD) noted that fact and editorialized that Obama feared a court-martial
because it could lead to him being charged with providing material
assistance to a terrorist enemy:

Every one of the men who served with Bergdahl or tried to find him and who
have spoken out publicly has said he was clearly a deserter.

Indeed, the uncontestable fact is that Bergdahl walked away from his post
in a time of war, leaving his weapon and gear behind. He was not out for a
walk to relieve stress or clear his head.

"Bowe Bergdahl deserted during a time of war, and his fellow Americans lost
their lives searching for him," former Sgt. Matt Vierkant told CNN. At
least six soldiers died in operations looking for Bergdahl.

Fox News analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano has said that Obama dreads a
court-martial for desertion, which is what the report might recommend,
because questions regarding a trade providing material assistance to a
terrorist group could be asked.

"We have a federal statute which makes it a felony to provide material
assistance to any terrorist organization," Napolitano said. "It could be
money, maps, professional services, any asset whatsoever, (including) human
assets."

And there’s the nagging question of whether a ransom for Bergdahl was
offered and/or paid. As Fox News has reported
<http://nation.foxnews.com/2015/12/15/botched-ransom-congressman-presses-answers-fbi-role-payment-bergdahl>,
Rep. Duncan Hiunter, R-Calif., has been pursuing whether the Obama
administration tried to trade cash for Bergdahl:

The FBI played a central role in making a botched “payment” meant to help
secure Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s release last year, according to the office
of a House Republican now seeking answers on why the bureau was involved at
all in the apparent rescue attempt.

Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif. --- who has long questioned whether a ransom
of some kind was offered for Bergdahl’s release --- claimed in a recent
letter to the Justice Department inspector general that he has learned
“non-DoD organizations, led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
undertook the recovery mission.”

As part of this effort, Hunter told DOJ IG Michael Horowitz, the FBI even
went to the Afghanistan-Pakistan border and “awaited Bergdahl’s arrival
following some form of discussion about facilitating a payment.”

Bergdahl didn’t show -- and ultimately was not released until May when he
was traded for five Taliban leaders. Hunter’s chief of staff, Joe Kasper,
told FoxNews.com the unsuccessful FBI border visit came after this
operation paid an Afghan intermediary, who then ran off with the money.

As Investor’s Business Daily
<http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/120214-728767-duncan-hunter-questions-bergdahl-ransom-payment.htm?p=2>
reported in a December 2014 editorial, Hunter had also pursued the ransom
payment for Bergdahl issue with outgoing Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel:

"It has been brought to my attention that a payment was made to an Afghan
intermediary who 'disappeared' with the money and failed to facilitate
Bergdahl's release in return," Hunter wrote in a Nov. 4 letter to outgoing
Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel.

As Bill Gertz reports in the Washington Free Beacon, Hagel's Nov. 21
response to Hunter was a tad equivocal. The Pentagon "did not make any
payment of ransom nor make any attempt to pay ransom for the lease of Sgt.
Bergdahl," Hagel said.

Hagel then added that "we have no information that any payment was made to
an Afghan intermediary in exchange for facilitating Sgt. Bergdahl's
release." OK, so which is it — that no ransom was paid or there's no
information that a ransom was paid?

Gertz reports that Hunter also wrote to the Pentagon's inspector general,
Jon Rymer, a letter that noted: "Defense officials said the payments were
likely part of a $5 million fund that the commander of the U.S. Central
Command has at his disposal, which can be used to pay rewards or to
purchase information leading to the release of captive."

Was President Obama offering a ransom to get Bergdahl back under the radar,
switching to the Gitmo Taliban trade as a Plan B? Bergdahl deserves court
martial and imprisonment for his desertion in time of war. The question is
just what President Obama deserves for providing material aid and comfort
to a terrorist enemy?

Read more:
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/12/bergdahl_court_martial_also_indicts_obama.html#ixzz3ubm67LvX
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rw?id=dlia0Qbjyr4BNDacwqm_6l&u=AmericanThinker>
| AmericanThinker
on Facebook
<http://ec.tynt.com/b/rf?id=dlia0Qbjyr4BNDacwqm_6l&u=AmericanThinker>


__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmdmJsZHYwBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTAzODA3ODQ->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcHFpZWtvBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MDM4MDc4NA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to