Daniel Greenfield's article: The Progressive Panopticon of Political
Correctness <http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/>

[image: Link to Sultan Knish] <http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/>
------------------------------



Posted: 16 Dec 2015 09:32 PM PST

<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-OmI2oiww7LE/VnBbK-IoVwI/AAAAAAAAPiU/kX1nxHcGkPE/s1600/panopticon-image.jpg>



Around the time that the United States Constitution had been hammered out,
across the way in the UK, social theorist Jeremy Bentham was coming up with
the Panopticon.

Bentham had denounced the ideas of the Declaration of Independence as
"subversive of every actual or imaginable kind of Government". He demanded
that force be used to "teach this rebellious people" that "there is no
peace with them, but the peace of the King".

After the "Peace of the King" failed in the United States, Bentham turned
to his obsession with the Panopticon. The Panopticon would be a prison in
which all the prisoners could be watched all the time to achieve, in
Bentham's words, "a new mode of obtaining power of mind over mind, in a
quantity hitherto without example."

Bentham's Panopticon never worked, but the internet has made the Panopticon
and its ability to obtain "power over mind" a reality. In a "quantity
hitherto without example".

<http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-D0_3mhJ17EE/VnBdj1XjbfI/AAAAAAAAPiw/3_9ZjhqKii8/s1600/aa948c1dc2c1_sf_9.jpg>Social
media has made private discourse public. In the Wilson days of WWI, when
hysteria was at its peak, people could be arrested for private
conversations. But that was the exception, not the rule. It was only in the
worst Communist societies that informants were so rife that private
discourse was almost completely stifled. But the internet shreds the line
between public and private.

The new informer doesn't file a report at the local KGB office. He
participates in a social media collective which among its hobbies plucks
some obscure "problematic" remark out of the social stream and turns its
speaker into a target for a mob. A lynch hashtag is born and someone loses
their job. All of this is done with the self-pitying catastrophic
crybullying so typical of social justice warriors who scream that they're
the victims even while they're gleefully destroying someone else's life.

It's no coincidence that this foul habit emerged out of Communist China
where morality mobs targeted petty offenders on the internet in collective
shaming rituals that sometimes escalated into violence or suicide. The
Communist dictatorship that gave us the Cultural Revolution helped give
birth to its hideous CyberStalinist offspring which enforces political
correctness through bullying.

Social media made the surveillance society possible. Even in the early days
of the internet, the metaphor of the Panopticon was revived to predict its
future. Art students still continue to churn out laboriously pretentious
projects involving surveillance cameras and faceless mannequins. But it's
the voluntary participation in social media that provided material for
surveillance.

The old internet was anonymous. The new internet was data hungry. Nearly
every major dot com is built on collecting and making use of information
about people. Google, Facebook and a hundred other companies offer free
products in exchange for personal data. Free apps for smartphones are built
on gaining access to your address book. Everyone is trying to build the
biggest and most comprehensive database for selling ads and manipulating
user behavior.

<http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-R8At_9105Sk/VnBcJJagtII/AAAAAAAAPic/K1JCl3-xr_c/s1600/Bhph-fGCEAEUFNl.png>That
is where the Panopticon really begins. Surveillance without intervention is
voyeurism. Surveillance with intervention is tyranny. The awareness of
surveillance changes behavior. That was the fundamental idea of the
Panopticon. Surveillance alone was power. To rephrase Focault, "we become
the principle of our own subjection." The awareness of surveillance changes
how we live.

All tyrannies understood that to control people they had to follow the
Panopticon's model in which the people were to always perceive themselves
as being potentially under surveillance. It was the perception that
mattered more than the reality, eliminated the difference between private
and personal, transformed Homo Sapiens into Homo Sovieticus (or Homosos in
the dissident jargon), a self-righteous hypocrite, a politically correct
criminal to whom Doublethink was natural.

Social media makes it easy to impose collectivist virtue signaling
behaviors. Get a rainbow avatar to celebrate gay marriage. Retweet this
social justice clickbait to show you're outraged at the thing that "the
internet" is outraged by. Demonstrate that you engage in goodthinkful
social justice thoughts and are guiltfree of crimethink.

The echo chamber, the political bubble, is also a Panopticon. Herd
behaviors are rewarded. Dissent is punished. No one is quite sure who on
their friend list might turn on them, denounce them for some "problematic"
remark or lack of enthusiasm for a cause, cripple their social networking,
their careers and their social life. Panic in the herd is routine. A social
justice social media message is somehow wrong. A joke turns out to be
offensive. The 21st century Winston Smith begins to breathe hard,
apologizes for his political error and vows to educate himself on proper
intersectionality principles.

He edges closer to the telescreen which is always watching him and always
shouting at him to pay attention. It's the "paying attention" that matters
more than the message.

The less you think, the safer you are. In a politically correct society,
every idea is potentially "problematic". The safest attitude is to pass on
approved ideas in exactly the terms which they were uttered. Any
independent thinking or deviation even in support of the cause is
dangerous. It may be "Problematic". It may be "Doubleplusungood
Crimethink". It's safer just to retweet. To express ambiguous outrage and
support for whatever is on the timeline Telescreen. To just appear to be
part of the collective "outrage of the internet", to shame someone else for
Social Justice Crimethink.

Instead of being shamed yourself for some problematic social justice
offense.

<http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-WxiHVpadPlA/VnBcpjxNgCI/AAAAAAAAPik/O4TnIyzWNsQ/s1600/l6stezje2pzr7yzhdmkq.png>Orwell's
1984 envisioned the Telescreen as a Panopticon erasing the privacy of the
home.

"There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at
any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged
in on any individual wire was guesswork." But social media and social
justice warriors make for a much more efficient erasure of not only
personal space, but mental space.

Thought Policing is the goal of Political Correctness. Crowdsourcing it
makes it possible for a small number of angry activists and their amateur
imitators to terrorize a large population.

The left has always understood the supreme value of controlling discourse.
The media manufactured a consensus, shaping public opinion by creating the
illusion that its view was public opinion. When Obama says that X "is not
who we are", he is manufacturing our consensus and imposing his value
system as our own. Push polls, personal perspective and man-on-the-street
stories help reinforce this artificial consensus by personalizing it. But
the media was always a basically crude tool.

Most Americans get their news from the media, but distrust its biases. Jon
Stewart and his imitators radicalized the media by making bias into the
news and eliminating the line between entertainment, editorial commentary
and information, even while castigating the media for exactly these habits.
The media eagerly embraced Stewart's savaging by turning up the bias and
virtue signaling to eleven.

But in a Panopticon, the guards are meant to see all the prisoners, but
never to be seen. The media is always seen, but can never see in. The media
could speak through its Telescreen, but its Big Brothers couldn't listen
in. It could not force the public to participate in its discourse. Often
the public just tuned out the more bothersome media agendas.

Social media can see in. It avoids the problems that the NSA and any
government surveillance program faces trying to sift through a ton of data
by crowdsourcing it to the activist informer. Everyone can be the KGB now.
Everyone can not only love Big Brother, but be Big Brother.

At least for 15 minutes or so.

<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-_SFwNcOzTLI/VnBdpEZmTrI/AAAAAAAAPi4/tQljHyb7HeU/s1600/121128083420-obama-twitter-blog.jpg>The
left's ultimate goal is the total politicization of society by eliminating
personal space. The USSR originally did not want to build kitchens in
homes, because it wanted workers eating in cafeterias. The kitchen is a
private family space. A cafeteria is a public space that could be
controlled. Even when the cafeterias failed, families were kept in
collective apartments where dozens of people lived together in mutual
hostility and distrust. In such a space, nothing is private or personal.

To totally control the individual, it is necessary to completely eliminate
his personal spaces, his capacity for authenticity and individuality. In
such an environment, every man becomes a convict, a prisoner of a social
collective, a drone in a hive and a cringing beast in a frightened herd.

That is the Panopticon. It's the world that political correctness is
building for us. It's made possible by technology and the eagerness of the
crybully to put up a new iron curtain for his safe space.

Political correctness politicizes every area of life from food to
literature to entertainment to clothes. Nothing is apolitical and therefore
nothing is personal. The individual cannot be allowed to exist. He must
join the collective. No government has made the Panopticon work perfectly,
but the collective can.

The left is simply the war of an ideological collective against the
individual. It is the war of the political against the personal. It is the
war of power against freedom. It is the war of the progressive Panopticon
against the mind of man.

<http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-lWAe8gtMLwI/VnBe3N2LVeI/AAAAAAAAPjA/8tdc6O0qAXk/s1600/tumblr_nm6lc6jaDi1u6r36zo1_1280.jpg>

Daniel Greenfield is a New York City based writer and blogger and a
Shillman Journalism Fellow of the David Horowitz Freedom Center.

<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=uzeYGXYMeYU:EKzM0Owl9wY:yIl2AUoC8zA>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=uzeYGXYMeYU:EKzM0Owl9wY:I9og5sOYxJI>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=uzeYGXYMeYU:EKzM0Owl9wY:63t7Ie-LG7Y>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=uzeYGXYMeYU:EKzM0Owl9wY:F7zBnMyn0Lo>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=uzeYGXYMeYU:EKzM0Owl9wY:UT3xtbGYFzA>
<http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews?a=uzeYGXYMeYU:EKzM0Owl9wY:qj6IDK7rITs>





Email delivery powered by Google






__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmbTZydTJuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTAzODA5Njc->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJldTJpbzZuBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MDM4MDk2Nw-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to