​"​
*closing gitmo is on his agenda, but it's was the Pentagon that released
the prisoners*
*​*" but on order from the Commander-In-Chief​
.


On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 3:15 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
wrote:

> There is no question that the intent to close Guantanamo is President
> Obama's and his alone!
> ---
> closing gitmo is on his agenda, but it's was the Pentagon that released
> the prisoners.
>
>
> On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 at 2:04:09 PM UTC-6, KeithInTampa wrote:
>>
>> Wrong again Plain Ol'. There is no question that the intent to close
>> Guantanamo is President Obama's and his alone!  As a matter of fact, the
>> Pentagon has been opposed to this move, (and when those Generals have
>> opposed the President, they have been dismissed!)
>>
>> I just don't get how you can twist hate filled Progressive Anti-American
>> policy and rhetoric into something that you now act like you support.  It's
>> unbecoming.
>>
>>
>> http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/White-House-Obama-Pentagon-Guantanamo-Bay/2015/12/01/id/704158/
>>
>>
>> http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/12/02/white-house-pentagon-plan-close-guantanamo-bay-pricey-600m/
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 1:07 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> that decision was made by the Pentagon, not Obama.
>>
>> On Wednesday, December 23, 2015 at 11:27:15 AM UTC-6, Bill wrote:
>>
>> If any innocents die because of Obama's release of these terrorists  then
>> their blood will be upon Obama's hands.......
>>
>> In a message dated 12/23/2015 8:25:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
>> [email protected] writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> http://www.hstoday.us/columns/the-kimery-report/blog/in-keeping-his-pledge-to-empty-out-gitmo-obama-releases-hardened-al-qaeda-other-jihadists-pentagon-deemed-most-high-risk/cbf530fdbc22854a69976d9c9bf6c892.html
>>
>>
>>
>> In Keeping His Pledge to Empty Out GITMO, Obama Releases Hardened Al
>> Qaeda, Other Jihadists Pentagon Deemed Most ‘High Risk’
>>
>> *September 28, 2015*
>>
>> By: Anthony Kimery, Editor-in-Chief
>>
>> During the last two months, the Obama administration -- in its continuing
>> effort to close down Joint Task Force-Guantanamo (JTF-GITMO) -- has
>> released four more Al Qaeda members the Pentagon earlier repeatedly
>> considered to be a “high risk” of reengaging in jihad if freed.
>>
>>
>>
>> The latest detainee released, Saudi-born British resident Shakir Abd Al
>> Rahim Muhammad Aamer, had been “assessed to be a high risk, as he is likely
>> to pose a threat to the US, its interests and allies,” stated a leaked
>> JTF-GITMO assessment report about him
>> <http://www.hstoday.us/fileadmin/PDFs/Shaker_Aamer.pdf>.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Pentagon’s reasons for his continued detention was because he “is a
>> member of Al Qaeda, with significant ties to senior level extremists, to
>> include Usama Bin Laden … held a senior level position among the UK based
>> Al Qaeda cell, is a reported facilitator, recruiter and financier and is
>> associated with Al Qaeda cells inside the US. Detainee was an assessed
>> combatant sub-Commander in Tora Bora where he participated in hostilities
>> against US and Coalition forces,” and “has lengthy ties to militant jihad
>> and has received basic and advanced training, to include explosives
>> training.”
>>
>>
>>
>> According to his previously secret Guantanamo case file, he “admitted”
>> associating with “Shoebomber” Richard Reid, and was a roommate of Zaccarias
>> Moussoui, the convicted 9/11 plotter.
>>
>>
>>
>> Furthermore, Aamer “has shown a willingness to become a martyr for his
>> cause.”
>>
>>
>>
>> His leaked JTF-GITMO assessment disclosed that he “has expressed a desire
>> to become a martyr and gave indications of attacking US citizens upon
>> release,” and that … he would be happy to be a martyr for his religion.”
>>
>>
>>
>> He also stated “the United States would, and should, fall because it has
>> become an unjust nation and God would take his revenge on the United States
>> for the unlawful imprisonment of innocent Muslims just as himself.”
>>
>>
>>
>> He further “stated it was honorable that the insurgents in Iraq were
>> willing to give their lives for what they believed was a noble cause.”
>>
>>
>>
>> Then Guantanamo commander, Rear Admiral Mark H Buzby, detailed DoD’s
>> concerns that Aamer would seek to launch a terrorist attack against the
>> United States if he were ever to be freed in his November 1, 2007 JTF-GITMO
>> assessment report.
>>
>>
>>
>> In January, Obama stated he would ‘prioritize’ the release of Aamer, who
>> other GITMO detainees consider to be their leader, and who was cleared for
>> release by the Bush administration in 2007, at the same time the Pentagon
>> said he should remain under DoD detention because of the “high risk” he
>> posed to the US, its allies and interests.
>>
>>
>>
>> But that same year, the British Foreign Office said Aamer should not be
>> freed because of “significant additional security concerns.” Nevertheless,
>> he was subsequently cleared for release in 2010 by the Guantánamo Review
>> Task Force in which six US intelligence agencies, including the CIA and
>> FBI, reputedly agreed he no longer posed a threat to the United States or
>> its allies.
>>
>>
>>
>> In a letter from the then UK Foreign Secretary William Hague to Aamer’s
>> lawyer, Aamer had apparently only been cleared for transfer back to his
>> native Saudi Arabia.
>>
>>
>>
>> But under the terms of his release, he is being transferred to British
>> security authorities instead.
>>
>>
>>
>> The British-based Save Shaker Aamer compaign has long alleged
>> <http://saveshaker.org/wikileaks-file-proves-that-shaker-aamer-should-be-released/60>
>> that, “The Guantanamo files confirm that Guantanamo is a colossal crime
>> against humanity committed against those who were rounded up as part of the
>> frantic search by the US for intelligence on Osama Bin Laden. They are
>> victims, expendable in the pursuit of vengeance for 9/11.”
>>
>>
>>
>> In November 2014, an *Al Jazeera* report stated, “Cleared for release
>> for more than seven years, Aamer should be freed immediately.” He was
>> among dozens of detained jihadists the American Civil Liberties Union
>> stated Obama approved for release in 2012
>> <https://www.aclu.org/files/assets/list_of_guantanamo_prisoners_approved_for_transfer.pdf>.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *The release of Shalabi*
>>
>>
>>
>> Abdul Shalabi, who is believed to have been a bodyguard for Bin Laden,
>> was transferred to Saudi Arabia earlier this month, the Defense Department
>> announced last week.
>>
>>
>>
>> Shalabi's transfer from Guantanamo is the third detainee released in less
>> than a week, leaving 114 former “high-value targets” still in custody.
>>
>>
>>
>> On June 15, a Periodic Review Board (PRB) review consisting of
>> representatives from the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice
>> and State; the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Office of the Director of
>> National Intelligence, determined continued law of war detention of Shalabi
>> “does not remain necessary to protect against a continuing significant
>> threat to the security of the United States.
>>
>>
>>
>> As a result of that review, which examined a number of factors, including
>> security issues, Shalabi was recommended for transfer by consensus of the
>> six departments and agencies comprising the Periodic Review Board,” the
>> Pentagon announced.
>>
>>
>>
>> The PRB process was established by Obama’s March 7, 2011 Executive Order
>> 13567
>> <https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/07/executive-order-13567-periodic-review-individuals-detained-guant-namo-ba>.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> In accordance with statutory requirements, the secretary of defense
>> informed Congress of the United States' intent to transfer Shalabi and of
>> his determination that this transfer meets the statutory standard.
>>
>>
>>
>> In 2007 and again in 2008, JTF-GTMO recommended Shalabi continue to be
>> detained under DoD control primarily because he “has familial ties to Usama
>> Bin Laden and has demonstrated his hatred for Americans at JTF-GTMO and
>> will likely reestablish ties to Al Qaeda and other extremist elements if
>> released,” stated his leaked classified JTF-GITMO file
>> <http://www.hstoday.us/fileadmin/PDFs/Abdul_Shalabi.pdf>.
>>
>>
>>
>> The same 2008 file also reasoned that he “will require a long-term,
>> dedicated plan to solicit information of intelligence value.”
>>
>>
>>
>> Shalabi “is a member of Al Qaeda and a long-term bodyguard for Usama Bin
>> Laden, serving in that position beginning in 1999,” his secret 2008 PRB
>> report disclosed, noting he’d “received specialized close combat training
>> for his role as a suicide operative in an aborted component of the 11
>> September 2001 Al Qaeda attacks.” He also “participated in hostilities
>> against US and Coalition forces and was captured with a group referred to
>> as the Dirty 30, which included [Bin Laden] bodyguards and an assessed 20th
>> September 11, 2001 hijacker.”
>>
>>
>>
>> He also “received basic militant and advanced training at Al Qaeda
>> associated training camps.”
>>
>>
>>
>> The Department of Defense transfered Shalabi to the government of the
>> Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, saying, "The United States is grateful to the
>> government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for its willingness to support
>> ongoing US efforts to close the Guantanamo Bay detention facility. The
>> United States coordinated with the government of the Kingdom of Saudi
>> Arabia to ensure this transfer took place consistent with appropriate
>> security and humane treatment measures.”
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *The first release since September*
>>
>>
>>
>> The first detainee released since September was Libyan national Omar
>> Mohammed Khalif Abu Bakr
>> <http://www.hstoday.us/columns/the-kimery-report/blog/another-high-risk-al-qaeda-tied-gitmo-detainee-to-be-released/3c4bb2c056bc275e33a63515a2d5e5f5.html>,
>> who’d been determined by the JTF-GITMO PRB that detaining Khalif “is no
>> longer necessary to protect against a continuing significant threat to the
>> security of the United States.”
>>
>>
>>
>> The PRB said Abu Bakr’s deteriorating health and “constructive role in
>> the detention environment” are factors in the administration’s decision to
>> order his release.
>>
>>
>>
>> “While the board acknowledges the detainee’s past terrorist-related
>> activities and connections, it found that the risk the detainee presents
>> can be adequately mitigated,” the PRB concluded -- a decision glaringly at
>> odds with past recent decisions that Abu Bakr should remain in DOD custody
>> because of the “high risk” danger he was assessed to pose to the US and its
>> interests.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Chekkouri’s release*
>>
>>
>>
>> Earlier, Younis Abdurrahman Chekkouri was transferred from GITMO to
>> Morocco.
>>
>>
>>
>> Agence France-Presse reported there’s no indication whether Chekkouri
>> will be imprisoned in Morocco, put under house arrest or simply set free.
>> He was not immediately freed upon arrival in Morocco.
>>
>>
>>
>> The Pentagon said Chekkouri was sent home to Morocco following a
>> "comprehensive" PRB security review. But in 2007, and again in 2008,
>> JTF-GITMO stated Chekkouri should continue to be detained under DoD control
>> because, “If released without rehabilitation, close supervision and means
>> to successfully reintegrate into his society as a law-abiding citizen, it
>> is assessed detainee would probably seek out prior associates and reengage
>> in hostilities and extremist support activities.”
>>
>>
>>
>> “Since his transfer to JTF-GTMO, detainee has been somewhat compliant
>> with the guard force, but has one incident of threatening to kill a guard.
>> He is non- cooperative with debriefers and withholds information of
>> intelligence value, probably indicating his continued support for Islamic
>> extremism,” a leaked secret 2008 JTF-GITMO report on Chekkouri stated
>> <http://www.hstoday.us/fileadmin/PDFs/Younis_Abdurrahman_Chekkouri.pdf>.
>>
>>
>>
>> Continuing, the formerly “secret” report said he “co-founded the Moroccan
>> Islamic Fighting Group (GICM) and served as the head of its Military
>> Commission.”
>>
>>
>>
>> He also “formerly oversaw GICM operations in Afghanistan, Syria and
>> Turkey. Detainee is assessed to have been a close Usama Bin Laden associate
>> who played a central role in coordinating mutual support between the GICM
>> and Al Qaeda, to include providing GICM fighters to support Al Qaeda combat
>> operations in Afghanistan and terrorist attacks in Europe.”
>>
>>
>>
>> GICM is believed to be responsible for deadly bombings in Casablanca in
>> 2003 and Madrid in 2004.
>>
>>
>>
>> Chekkouri also was “assessed to have engaged in hostilities against US
>> and Coalition forces as the GICM senior commander on the Bagram front lines
>> and at Tora Bora, and was captured with other extremist fighters fleeing
>> Tora Bora. Detainee ran the Moroccan Training Camp at the Derunta Training
>> Complex and trained militant fighters in explosive detonators, chemical
>> weapons and military tactics at the Algerian Guesthouse in Jalalabad
>> [Afghanistan] and at Derunta. Detainee has familial ties to the GICM and Al
>> Qaeda members, including former JTF-GTMO detainees who have attempted to
>> reconstitute the GICM.”
>>
>>
>>
>> In 2008, he was “assessed to be a high risk who is likely to reaffiliate
>> with the Al Qaeda network as a senior commander and resume hostilities upon
>> release.”
>>
>>
>>
>> Nevertheless, the Pentagon said the interagency Guantanamo Review Task
>> Force conducted a comprehensive review of his case, and that as a result of
>> that review -- which examined a number of factors, including security
>> issues -- Chekkouri was unanimously approved for transfer by the six
>> departments and agencies comprising the task force.
>>
>>
>>
>> "The United States coordinated with the government of Morocco to ensure
>> this transfer took place consistent with appropriate security and humane
>> treatment measures," a Pentagon spokesman said.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *The others*
>>
>>
>>
>> A week after the one-year travel ban expired for the five “high risk”
>> former top Taliban- and Al Qaeda-linked Guantanamo detainees who were
>> exchanged for captured US Army Sgt. Robert Bergdahl (allowing the Taliban
>> jihadists to return to Afghanistan and rejoin the jihad against the West
>> and America), the Obama administration released another six “high risk”
>> Yemeni Al Qaeda operatives
>> <http://www.hstoday.us/columns/the-kimery-report/blog/six-more-high-risk-gitmo-detainees-released-by-obama-lawmaker-calls-it-reckless/3707d3bac4b4ae266e31e2a407c0a62b.html>
>> to Oman in a move that infuriated both Republicans and Democrats, as
>> lawmakers ruminate new restrictions on further transfers.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yemen is home to Al Qaeda’s most dangerous affiliate, Al Qaeda in the
>> Arabian Peninsula (AQAP). The transfers of the Yemeni detainees were made
>> in spite of the fact Obama’s own intelligence advisors confirmed one-third
>> of released detainees have re-engaged in jihad.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Homeland Security Today* reported in-depth in its January 22, 2015
>> report, *There Will be Blood: Freeing the Vilest of the Vile from GITMO*
>> <http://www.hstoday.us/columns/the-kimery-report/blog/there-will-be-blood-freeing-the-vilest-of-the-vile-from-gitmo/31e8f365252c825c96038bc24ff4eee7.html>,
>> that the five senior Taliban- Al Qaeda-linked detainees the administration
>> released in June 2014 were freed because the administration has
>> consistently claimed that the remaining GITMO detainees – the last and most
>> dangerous of whom pose a high risk of re-engaging in jihad -- is because
>> “GITMO continues to inspire violent acts around the globe.”
>>
>>
>>
>> “We are committed to closing the detention facility. That’s our goal and
>> we are working toward that goal,” Ian Moss, a spokesman for the Department
>> of State on GITMO issues has said.
>>
>>
>>
>> In his January 20, 2015 State of the Union address, Obama stated, “As
>> Americans, we have a profound commitment to justice. So it makes no sense
>> to spend $3 million per prisoner to keep open a prison that the world
>> condemns and terrorists use to recruit. (Applause). Since I’ve been
>> President, we’ve worked responsibly to cut the population of GITMO in half.
>> Now it is time to finish the job. And I will not relent in my determination
>> to shut it down. It is not who we are. It’s time to close GITMO.
>> (Applause).”
>>
>>
>>
>> Yet, in November, 2012, the Obama administration pressured Iraq not to
>> release senior Hezbollah leader Ali Mussa Daqduq -- who’d been captured by
>> US troops in Basra on March 20, 2007 and eventually turned over to Iraq for
>> prosecution -- because the administration believed he’d likely commit more
>> acts of terrorism against US forces if he were released. The US said the
>> Hezbollah operative was guilty of kidnapping, torturing and murdering US
>> soldiers in Iraq. Two Iraqi courts found him not guilty and ordered his
>> release against the US’s wishes.
>>
>>
>>
>> The contrast to the administration’s release of potentially dangerous
>> Taliban and Al Qaeda operatives – both organizations share the same goal;
>> global jihad – couldn’t be any more glaring.
>>
>>
>>
>> Indeed. Officials said there’s a high recidivism rate among the most
>> hardened jihadists so far released. If that’s true, then the release of
>> Taliban and Al Qaeda members this year whom the Department of Defense
>> declared several times should not be released because of the risk they
>> pose, is at odds with Obama’s executive order “to effect the appropriate
>> disposition of individuals currently detained and promptly close” GITMO in
>> a manner that’s “consistent with the national security and foreign policy
>> interests of the United States.”
>>
>>
>>
>> National Security Council spokesman Ned Price repeated Obama’s argument
>> that keeping GITMO open gives Islamist jihadists a reason to carry out
>> attacks against the United States.
>>
>>
>>
>> “As the president has repeatedly made clear, the administration is
>> determined to close the” facility, Price said. “We are taking all possible
>> steps to reduce the detainee population at Guantanamo and to close the
>> detention facility in a responsible manner.”
>>
>>
>>
>> "It is not in our national security interest to continue to detain
>> individuals if we as a government have determined that they can be
>> transferred from Guantanamo responsibly,” stated said Ian Moss, who works
>> on detainee transfers at the State Department.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Analysis*
>>
>>
>>
>> “Not in our national interest to continue to detain them?” sarcastically
>> quipped one of several counterterrorism officials *Homeland Security
>> Today* earlier interviewed on background because they aren’t authorized
>> to discuss the matter.
>>
>>
>>
>> This “doesn’t seem to me to be consistent with protecting our national
>> security … or, as the President said in his State of the Union address,
>> working responsibly to cut GITMO’s population!” the official said.
>>
>>
>>
>> “There’s just not much intel to back up [the administration’s reasoning]
>> for letting these terrorists loose. There’s just not,” another one of the
>> counterterrorism officials earlier expressed to *Homeland Security Today*.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> “So, let me get this straight; releasing hardened, devoutly Islamist
>> jihadists – the true believers whose minds aren’t going to be changed -- is
>> going to stop Al Qaeda, its affiliates, ISIS and other jihad groups and
>> organizations to suddenly stop recruiting and carrying out jihad? That's
>> just messed up,” another official stated.
>>
>>
>>
>> Rep. Howard P. McKeon (R-Calif.) chairman of the House Armed Services
>> Committee, and Sen. James Inofe (R-Okla.), ranking member of the Senate
>> Armed Services Committee, stated in a joint statement last year that the
>> administration’s
>>
>> ...
>
> --
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PoliticalForum" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to