If any innocents die because of Obama's release of these  terrorists  then 
their blood will be upon Obama's hands.......
 
 
In a message dated 12/23/2015 8:25:00 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
[email protected] writes:

 









http://www.hstoday.us/columns/the-kimery-report/blog/in-keeping-his-pledge-t
o-empty-out-gitmo-obama-releases-hardened-al-qaeda-other-jihadists-pentagon-
deemed-most-high-risk/cbf530fdbc22854a69976d9c9bf6c892.html 
In Keeping His  Pledge to Empty Out GITMO, Obama Releases Hardened Al 
Qaeda, Other Jihadists  Pentagon Deemed Most ‘High Risk’  
September 28,  2015   
By: Anthony Kimery,  Editor-in-Chief 
During the last two  months, the Obama administration -- in its continuing 
effort to close down  Joint Task Force-Guantanamo (JTF-GITMO) -- has 
released four more Al Qaeda  members the Pentagon earlier repeatedly considered 
to 
be a “high risk” of  reengaging in jihad if freed.  
The latest detainee  released, Saudi-born British resident Shakir Abd Al 
Rahim Muhammad Aamer, had  been “assessed to be a high risk, as he is likely 
to pose a threat to the US,  its interests and allies,” _stated a leaked 
JTF-GITMO assessment report about him_ 
(http://www.hstoday.us/fileadmin/PDFs/Shaker_Aamer.pdf) .   
The Pentagon’s  reasons for his continued detention was because he “is a 
member of Al Qaeda,  with significant ties to senior level extremists, to 
include Usama Bin Laden …  held a senior level position among the UK based Al 
Qaeda cell, is a reported  facilitator, recruiter and financier and is 
associated with Al Qaeda cells  inside the US. Detainee was an assessed 
combatant 
sub-Commander in Tora Bora  where he participated in hostilities against US 
and Coalition forces,” and  “has lengthy ties to militant jihad and has 
received basic and advanced  training, to include explosives training.”  
According to his  previously secret Guantanamo case file, he “admitted” 
associating with  “Shoebomber” Richard Reid, and was a roommate of Zaccarias 
Moussoui, the  convicted 9/11 plotter.  
Furthermore, Aamer  “has shown a willingness to become a martyr for his 
cause.”   
His leaked  JTF-GITMO assessment disclosed that he “has expressed a desire 
to become a  martyr and gave indications of attacking US citizens upon 
release,” and that …  he would be happy to be a martyr for his religion.”  
He  also stated “the United States would, and should, fall because it has 
become  an unjust nation and God would take his revenge on the United States 
for the  unlawful imprisonment of innocent Muslims just as himself.”   
He  further “stated it was honorable that the insurgents in Iraq were 
willing to  give their lives for what they believed was a noble cause.”   
Then Guantanamo  commander, Rear Admiral Mark H Buzby, detailed DoD’s 
concerns that Aamer would  seek to launch a terrorist attack against the United 
States if he were ever to  be freed in his November 1, 2007 JTF-GITMO 
assessment report.   
In  January, Obama stated he would ‘prioritize’ the release of Aamer, who 
other  GITMO detainees consider to be their leader, and who was cleared for 
release  by the Bush administration in 2007, at the same time the Pentagon 
said he  should remain under DoD detention because of the “high risk” he 
posed to the  US, its allies and interests.  
But that same year,  the British Foreign Office said Aamer should not be 
freed because of  “significant additional security concerns.” Nevertheless, 
he was subsequently  cleared for release in 2010 by the Guantánamo Review 
Task Force in which six  US intelligence agencies, including the CIA and FBI, 
reputedly agreed he no  longer posed a threat to the United States or its 
allies.   
In  a letter from the then UK Foreign Secretary William Hague to Aamer’s 
lawyer,  Aamer had apparently only been cleared for transfer back to his 
native Saudi  Arabia.  
But under the terms  of his release, he is being transferred to British 
security authorities  instead.  
The _British-based Save Shaker Aamer compaign has long alleged_ 
(http://saveshaker.org/wikileaks-file-proves-that-shaker-aamer-should-be-released/60)
   
that, “The Guantanamo files confirm that Guantanamo is a colossal crime  
against humanity committed against those who were rounded up as part of the  
frantic search by the US for intelligence on Osama Bin Laden. They are  
victims, expendable in the pursuit of vengeance for 9/11.”   
In  November 2014, an Al Jazeera report stated, “Cleared for release for  
more than seven years, Aamer should be freed immediately.” _He was among 
dozens of detained jihadists the American Civil  Liberties Union stated Obama 
approved for release in 2012_ 
(https://www.aclu.org/files/assets/list_of_guantanamo_prisoners_approved_for_transfer.pdf)
 .   
The release of  Shalabi   
Abdul Shalabi, who  is believed to have been a bodyguard for Bin Laden, was 
transferred to Saudi  Arabia earlier this month, the Defense Department 
announced last week.   
Shalabi's transfer  from Guantanamo is the third detainee released in less 
than a week, leaving  114 former “high-value targets” still in custody.  
On  June 15, a Periodic Review Board (PRB) review consisting of 
representatives  from the Departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice 
and State; 
the  Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Office of the Director of National  
Intelligence, determined continued law of war detention of Shalabi “does not  
remain necessary to protect against a continuing significant threat to the  
security of the United States.  
As  a result of that review, which examined a number of factors, including  
security issues, Shalabi was recommended for transfer by consensus of the 
six  departments and agencies comprising the Periodic Review Board,” the 
Pentagon  announced.  
The PRB process was  established by Obama’s March 7, 2011 _Executive Order 
13567_ 
(https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/07/executive-order-13567-periodic-review-individuals-detained-guant-namo-ba)
 .  
In  accordance with statutory requirements, the secretary of defense 
informed  Congress of the United States' intent to transfer Shalabi and of his  
determination that this transfer meets the statutory standard.   
In  2007 and again in 2008, JTF-GTMO recommended Shalabi continue to be 
detained  under DoD control primarily because he “has familial ties to Usama 
Bin Laden  and has demonstrated his hatred for Americans at JTF-GTMO and will 
likely  reestablish ties to Al Qaeda and other extremist elements if 
released,” _stated his leaked classified JTF-GITMO file_ 
(http://www.hstoday.us/fileadmin/PDFs/Abdul_Shalabi.pdf) .   
The same 2008 file  also reasoned that he “will require a long-term, 
dedicated plan to solicit  information of intelligence value.”  
Shalabi “is a  member of Al Qaeda and a long-term bodyguard for Usama Bin 
Laden, serving in  that position beginning in 1999,” his secret 2008 PRB 
report disclosed, noting  he’d “received specialized close combat training for 
his role as a suicide  operative in an aborted component of the 11 September 
2001 Al Qaeda attacks.”  He also “participated in hostilities against US 
and Coalition forces and was  captured with a group referred to as the Dirty 
30, which included [Bin Laden]  bodyguards and an assessed 20th September 
11, 2001 hijacker.”   
He  also “received basic militant and advanced training at Al Qaeda 
associated  training camps.”  
The Department of  Defense transfered Shalabi to the government of the 
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,  saying, "The United States is grateful to the 
government of the Kingdom of  Saudi Arabia for its willingness to support 
ongoing US 
efforts to close the  Guantanamo Bay detention facility. The United States 
coordinated with the  government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to ensure 
this transfer took place  consistent with appropriate security and humane 
treatment measures.”   
The first release  since September   
The first detainee  released since September was _Libyan national Omar 
Mohammed Khalif Abu Bakr_ 
(http://www.hstoday.us/columns/the-kimery-report/blog/another-high-risk-al-qaeda-tied-gitmo-detainee-to-be-released/3c4bb2c056bc275
e33a63515a2d5e5f5.html) , who’d been  determined by the JTF-GITMO PRB that 
detaining Khalif “is no longer necessary  to protect against a continuing 
significant threat to the security of the  United States.”  
The PRB said Abu  Bakr’s deteriorating health and “constructive role in 
the detention  environment” are factors in the administration’s decision to 
order his  release.  
“While the board  acknowledges the detainee’s past terrorist-related 
activities and connections,  it found that the risk the detainee presents can 
be 
adequately mitigated,” the  PRB concluded -- a decision glaringly at odds 
with past recent decisions that  Abu Bakr should remain in DOD custody because 
of the “high risk” danger he was  assessed to pose to the US and its 
interests.  
Chekkouri’s  release   
Earlier, Younis  Abdurrahman Chekkouri was transferred from GITMO to 
Morocco.   
Agence  France-Presse reported there’s no indication whether Chekkouri will 
be  imprisoned in Morocco, put under house arrest or simply set free. He 
was not  immediately freed upon arrival in Morocco.  
The Pentagon said  Chekkouri was sent home to Morocco following a 
"comprehensive" PRB security  review. But in 2007, and again in 2008, JTF-GITMO 
stated Chekkouri should  continue to be detained under DoD control because, “If 
released without  rehabilitation, close supervision and means to successfully 
reintegrate into  his society as a law-abiding citizen, it is assessed 
detainee would probably  seek out prior associates and reengage in hostilities 
and extremist support  activities.”  
“Since his transfer  to JTF-GTMO, detainee has been somewhat compliant with 
the guard force, but  has one incident of threatening to kill a guard. He 
is non- cooperative with  debriefers and withholds information of 
intelligence value, probably  indicating his continued support for Islamic 
extremism,” 
_a leaked secret 2008 JTF-GITMO report on Chekkouri stated_ 
(http://www.hstoday.us/fileadmin/PDFs/Younis_Abdurrahman_Chekkouri.pdf) .   
Continuing, the  formerly “secret” report said he “co-founded the Moroccan 
Islamic Fighting  Group (GICM) and served as the head of its Military 
Commission.”   
He  also “formerly oversaw GICM operations in Afghanistan, Syria and 
Turkey.  Detainee is assessed to have been a close Usama Bin Laden associate 
who 
played  a central role in coordinating mutual support between the GICM and Al 
Qaeda,  to include providing GICM fighters to support Al Qaeda combat 
operations in  Afghanistan and terrorist attacks in Europe.”  
GICM is believed to  be responsible for deadly bombings in Casablanca in 
2003 and Madrid in 2004.   
Chekkouri also was  “assessed to have engaged in hostilities against US and 
Coalition forces as  the GICM senior commander on the Bagram front lines 
and at Tora Bora, and was  captured with other extremist fighters fleeing Tora 
Bora. Detainee ran the  Moroccan Training Camp at the Derunta Training 
Complex and trained militant  fighters in explosive detonators, chemical 
weapons 
and military tactics at the  Algerian Guesthouse in Jalalabad [Afghanistan] 
and at Derunta. Detainee has  familial ties to the GICM and Al Qaeda 
members, including former JTF-GTMO  detainees who have attempted to 
reconstitute 
the GICM.”   
In  2008, he was “assessed to be a high risk who is likely to reaffiliate 
with the  Al Qaeda network as a senior commander and resume hostilities upon 
release.”   
Nevertheless, the  Pentagon said the interagency Guantanamo Review Task 
Force conducted a  comprehensive review of his case, and that as a result of 
that review -- which  examined a number of factors, including security issues 
-- Chekkouri was  unanimously approved for transfer by the six departments 
and agencies  comprising the task force.  
"The United States  coordinated with the government of Morocco to ensure 
this transfer took place  consistent with appropriate security and humane 
treatment measures," a  Pentagon spokesman said.  
The  others   
A  week after the one-year travel ban expired for the five “high risk” 
former top  Taliban- and Al Qaeda-linked Guantanamo detainees who were 
exchanged for  captured US Army Sgt. Robert Bergdahl (allowing the Taliban 
jihadists 
to  return to Afghanistan and rejoin the jihad against the West and 
America), the  _Obama administration released another six “high risk” Yemeni Al 
 
Qaeda operatives_ 
(http://www.hstoday.us/columns/the-kimery-report/blog/six-more-high-risk-gitmo-detainees-released-by-obama-lawmaker-calls-it-reckless/37
07d3bac4b4ae266e31e2a407c0a62b.html)  to Oman in a move that infuriated 
both Republicans and  Democrats, as lawmakers ruminate new restrictions on 
further transfers.   
Yemen is home to Al  Qaeda’s most dangerous affiliate, Al Qaeda in the 
Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).  The transfers of the Yemeni detainees were made in 
spite of the fact Obama’s  own intelligence advisors confirmed one-third of 
released detainees have  re-engaged in jihad.  
Homeland Security  Today reported in-depth  in its January 22, 2015 report, 
_There Will be Blood: Freeing the Vilest of the Vile from  GITMO_ 
(http://www.hstoday.us/columns/the-kimery-report/blog/there-will-be-blood-freeing-the-
vilest-of-the-vile-from-gitmo/31e8f365252c825c96038bc24ff4eee7.html) , that 
the five senior Taliban- Al Qaeda-linked detainees the  administration 
released in June 2014 were freed because the administration has  consistently 
claimed that the remaining GITMO detainees – the last and most  dangerous of 
whom pose a high risk of re-engaging in jihad -- is because  “GITMO continues 
to inspire violent acts around the globe.”   
“We are committed  to closing the detention facility. That’s our goal and 
we are working toward  that goal,” Ian Moss, a spokesman for the Department 
of State on GITMO issues  has said.  
In  his January 20, 2015 State of the Union address, Obama stated, “As 
Americans,  we have a profound commitment to justice. So it makes no sense to 
spend $3  million per prisoner to keep open a prison that the world condemns 
and  terrorists use to recruit. (Applause). Since I’ve been President, we’ve 
worked  responsibly to cut the population of GITMO in half. Now it is time 
to finish  the job. And I will not relent in my determination to shut it 
down. It is not  who we are. It’s time to close GITMO. (Applause).”  
Yet, in November,  2012, the Obama administration pressured Iraq not to 
release senior Hezbollah  leader Ali Mussa Daqduq -- who’d been captured by US 
troops in Basra on March  20, 2007 and eventually turned over to Iraq for 
prosecution -- because the  administration believed he’d likely commit more 
acts of terrorism against US  forces if he were released. The US said the 
Hezbollah operative was guilty of  kidnapping, torturing and murdering US 
soldiers in Iraq. Two Iraqi courts  found him not guilty and ordered his 
release 
against the US’s wishes.   
The contrast to the  administration’s release of potentially dangerous 
Taliban and Al Qaeda  operatives – both organizations share the same goal; 
global jihad – couldn’t  be any more glaring.  
Indeed. Officials  said there’s a high recidivism rate among the most 
hardened jihadists so far  released. If that’s true, then the release of 
Taliban 
and Al Qaeda members  this year whom the Department of Defense declared 
several times should not be  released because of the risk they pose, is at odds 
with Obama’s executive  order “to effect the appropriate disposition of 
individuals currently detained  and promptly close” GITMO in a manner that’s “
consistent with the national  security and foreign policy interests of the 
United States.”   
National Security  Council spokesman Ned Price repeated Obama’s argument 
that keeping GITMO open  gives Islamist jihadists a reason to carry out 
attacks against the United  States.  
“As the president  has repeatedly made clear, the administration is 
determined to close the”  facility, Price said. “We are taking all possible 
steps 
to reduce the detainee  population at Guantanamo and to close the detention 
facility in a responsible  manner.”  
"It is not in our  national security interest to continue to detain 
individuals if we as a  government have determined that they can be transferred 
from Guantanamo  responsibly,” stated said Ian Moss, who works on detainee 
transfers at the  State Department.  
Analysis   
“Not in our  national interest to continue to detain them?” sarcastically 
quipped one of  several counterterrorism officials Homeland Security Today 
earlier  interviewed on background because they aren’t authorized to discuss 
the  matter.  
This “doesn’t seem  to me to be consistent with protecting our national 
security … or, as the  President said in his State of the Union address, 
working responsibly to cut  GITMO’s population!” the official said.  
“There’s just not  much intel to back up [the administration’s reasoning] 
for letting these  terrorists loose. There’s just not,” another one of the 
counterterrorism  officials earlier expressed to Homeland Security Today.   
“So, let me get  this straight; releasing hardened, devoutly Islamist 
jihadists – the true  believers whose minds aren’t going to be changed -- is 
going to stop Al Qaeda,  its affiliates, ISIS and other jihad groups and 
organizations to suddenly stop  recruiting and carrying out jihad? That's just 
messed up,” another official  stated.  
Rep. Howard P.  McKeon (R-Calif.) chairman of the House Armed Services 
Committee, and Sen.  James Inofe (R-Okla.), ranking member of the Senate Armed 
Services Committee,  stated in a joint statement last year that the 
administration’s release of so  many of the most dangerous jihadists “may have 
consequences for the rest of  our forces and all Americans. Our terrorist 
adversaries now have a strong  incentive to capture Americans.”  
The war on terror  has reached a lethal phase, and it is insane to be 
letting these people out of  GITMO to go back to the fight,” said Sen. Lindsey 
Graham (R-SC).   
“It’s extremely  troubling that the Obama administration has sent six 
dangerous terrorists to  Oman, which borders Yemen -- a country engulfed in 
civil war and that serves  as the headquarters for Al Qaeda’s most dangerous 
affiliate," said Sen. Kelly  Ayotte (R-NH), a member of the Senate Committee on 
Armed Services.   
But, "Even more  disturbing,” Ayotte said, “is the fact that the 
administration has not  provided sufficient assurances to Congress or to the 
public 
that these  terrorists will not return to the battlefield. If they are not 
securely  detained, no one should be surprised if they travel to Yemen and 
re-engage in  terrorist activities," she said.  
Following the  administration’s June release of five top Taliban leaders 
who are among the  fundamentalist group’s most extreme and dangerous as part 
of a prisoner  exchange for Bergdahl, Homeland Security Today Contributing 
Writer  Godfrey Garner (who retired from US Special Forces in 2006 having 
served two  military tours and six civilian government related tours in 
Afghanistan)  wrote, “Professionals in the Intelligence Community are convinced 
these men  will return to the religiously mandated jihad against America and 
will be  welcomed back with open arms, free to renew their formal ties with Al 
Qaeda.  And in light of their ‘heroic’ time in enemy captivity, they will 
be hailed as  idols seen as having been victorious against America. Fueled by 
their stature  and their renewed commitment to jihad, they will be an asset 
to Al  Qaeda/Taliban anti-America efforts.”  
“While the  political implications of their release will be debated for 
some time, the  truth about what their release means is nothing short of 
prophetic. Few can  argue that their return to jihad is anything but a foregone 
conclusion,”  Garner stated. “Their release and perceived victory will be 
used by Taliban  and Al Qaeda commanders to strengthen the morale and 
commitment of their  fighters and girder the already growing jihadist 
infrastructure 
in the  region.” And, “This reinforced foundation will in time serve as an 
impetus  that will result in a resurgent terrorist base of operations in 
Afghanistan as  well as other Al Qaeda bases of operations in the region.”   
In  other words, the administration’s release of admittedly dangerous 
Islamist  jihadists has become a far better recruitment tool than the 
administration’s  reason for shutting down GITMO in the first place, if 
intelligence 
authorities  are correct, and it would increasingly appear they are.   
With that said,  it’s very likely more than just a few of the Al Qaeda and 
Taliban detainees  recently released from GITMO will soon appear on jihadi 
recruitment posters  ... and on the field of battle against the US and the 
West.   



__._,_.___
  
____________________________________
 Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) >   
____________________________________
 


_Visit Your Group_ 
(https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmcG92aHI2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMy
MzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTA4ODYxNTk-)   


 
(https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNzM2dGx0BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MDg4
NjE1OQ--)  
• _Privacy_ (https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html)  •
 _Unsubscribe_ 
(mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe)  • 
_Terms  of Use_ 
(https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/)  



__,_._,___






-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google  Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

*  Visit our other community at _http://www.PoliticalForum.com/_ 
(http://www.politicalforum.com/)  
*  It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the  latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message  because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To  unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email  to [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) .
For  more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to