ISRAEL WON’T STOP SPYING ON THE U.S.
BY JEFF STEIN <http://www.newsweek.com/authors/jeff-stein> ON 5/6/14 AT 
5:31 AM

   - 
   
<https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=http://www.newsweek.com/israel-wont-stop-spying-us-249757>
   - 
   
<https://twitter.com/home?status=Israel+Won%E2%80%99t+Stop+Spying+on+the+U.S.+http://www.newsweek.com/israel-wont-stop-spying-us-249757>
   - 
   
<https://www.tumblr.com/share/link?url=http://www.newsweek.com/israel-wont-stop-spying-us-249757>

WORLD <http://www.newsweek.com/world>ISRAEL 
<http://www.newsweek.com/topic/israel>ESPIONAGE 
<http://www.newsweek.com/topic/espionage>

Whatever happened to honor among thieves? When the National Security Agency 
was caught eavesdropping on German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s cell phone, 
it was considered a rude way to treat a friend. Now U.S. intelligence 
officials are saying—albeit very quietly, behind closed doors on Capitol 
Hill—that our Israeli “friends” have gone too far with their spying 
operations here.

According to classified briefings on legislation that would lower visa 
restrictions on Israeli citizens, Jerusalem’s efforts to steal U.S. secrets 
under the cover of trade missions and joint defense technology contracts 
have “crossed red lines.” 

Israel’s espionage activities in America are unrivaled and unseemly, 
counterspies have told members of the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs 
committees, going far beyond activities by other close allies, such as 
Germany, France, the U.K. and Japan. A congressional staffer familiar with 
a briefing last January called the testimony “very sobering…alarming…even 
terrifying.” Another staffer called it “damaging.” 

Try Newsweek for only $1.25 per week <http://www.newsweek.com/trial>

The Jewish state’s primary target: America’s industrial and technical 
secrets. 

“No other country close to the United States continues to cross the line on 
espionage like the Israelis do,” said a former congressional staffer who 
attended another classified briefing in late 2013, one of several in recent 
months given by officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 
the State Department, the FBI and the National Counterintelligence 
Directorate. 

The intelligence agencies didn’t go into specifics, the former aide said, 
but cited “industrial espionage—folks coming over here on trade missions or 
with Israeli companies working in collaboration with American companies, 
[or] intelligence operatives being run directly by the government, which I 
assume meant out of the [Israeli] Embassy.” 

An Israeli Embassy spokesman flatly denied the charges Tuesday after 
initially declining to comment. Aaron Sagui told Newsweek "Israel doesn't 
conduct espionage operations in the United States, period. We condemn the 
fact that such outrageous, false allegations are being directed against 
Israel." Representatives of two U.S. intelligence agencies, while 
acknowledging problems with Israeli spies, would not discuss classified 
testimony for the record. The FBI would neither confirm nor deny it briefed 
Congress. A State Department representative would say only that staff in 
its Consular and Israel Palestinian Affairs offices briefed members of 
Congress on visa reciprocity issues.

Of course, the U.S. spies on Israel, too. “It was the last place you wanted 
to go on vacation,” a former top CIA operative told Newsweek, because of 
heavy-handed Israeli surveillance. But the level of Israeli espionage here 
now has rankled U.S. counterspies.

“I don’t think anyone was surprised by these revelations,” the former aide 
said. “But when you step back and hear…that there are no other countries 
taking advantage of our security relationship the way the Israelis are for 
espionage purposes, it is quite shocking. I mean, it shouldn’t be lost on 
anyone that after all the hand-wringing over [Jonathan] Pollard, it’s still 
going on.”

Israel and pro-Israel groups in America have long lobbied U.S. 
administrations to free Pollard, a former U.S. naval intelligence analyst 
serving a life sentence since 1987 for stealing tens of thousands of 
secrets for Israel. (U.S. counterintelligence officials suspect that Israel 
traded some of the Cold War-era information to Moscow in exchange for the 
emigration of Russian Jews.) After denying for over a decade that Pollard 
was its paid agent, Israel apologized and promised not to spy on U.S. soil 
again. Since then, more Israeli spies have been arrested and convicted by 
U.S. courts. 

I.C. Smith, a former top FBI counterintelligence specialist during the 
Pollard affair, tells Newsweek, “In the early 1980s, dealing with the 
Israelis was, for those assigned that area, extremely frustrating. The 
Israelis were supremely confident that they had the clout, especially on 
the Hill, to basically get [away] with just about anything. This was the 
time of the Criteria Country List—later changed to the National Security 
Threat List—and I found it incredible that Taiwan and Vietnam, for 
instance, were on [it], when neither country had conducted activities that 
remotely approached the Pollard case, and neither had a history of, or a 
comparable capability to conduct, such activities.”

While all this was going on, Israel was lobbying hard to be put on the 
short list of countries (38 today) whose citizens don’t need visas to visit 
here. 

Until recently, the major sticking point was the Jewish state’s 
discriminatory and sometimes harsh treatment of Arab-Americans and U.S. 
Palestinians seeking to enter Israel. It has also failed to meet other 
requirements for the program, such as promptly and regularly reporting lost 
and stolen passports, officials say—a problem all the more pressing since 
Iranians were found to have boarded the missing Malaysia Airlines flight 
with stolen passports. 

“But this is the first time congressional aides have indicated that 
intelligence and national security concerns also are considerations in 
weighing Israel’s admission into the visa waiver program,” Jonathan Broder, 
the foreign and defense editor for CQ Roll Call, a Capitol Hill news site, 
wrote last month. He quoted a senior House aide as saying, “The U.S. 
intelligence community is concerned that adding Israel to the visa waiver 
program would make it easier for Israeli spies to enter the country.”

The Israelis “thought they could just snap their fingers” and get friends 
in Congress to legislate visa changes, a Hill aide said, instead of going 
through the required hoops with DHS. But facing resistance from U.S. 
intelligence, Israel recently signaled it’s willing to work with DHS, both 
Israeli and U.S. officials say. “Israel is interested in entering into the 
visa waiver program and is taking concrete steps to meet its conditions,” 
Israeli Embassy spokesman Aaron Sagui told Newsweek. “Most recently, the 
U.S. and Israel decided to establish a working group to advance the 
process,” Sagui added, saying that “Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Zeev 
Elkin will head the Israeli delegation.” He refused to say when the Elkin 
delegation was coming.

Congressional aides snorted at the announcement. “The Israelis haven’t done 
s**t to get themselves into the visa waiver program,” the former 
congressional aide said, echoing the views of two other House staffers 
working on the issue. “I mean, if the Israelis got themselves into this 
visa waiver program and if we were able to address this [intelligence 
community] concern—great, they’re a close ally, there are strong economic 
and cultural links between the two countries, it would be wonderful if more 
Israelis could come over here without visas. I’m sure it would spur 
investment and tourist dollars in our economy and so on and so forth. But 
what I find really funny is they haven’t done s**t to get into the program. 
They think that their friends in Congress can get them in, and that’s not 
the case. Congress can lower one or two of the barriers, but they can’t 
just legislate the Israelis in.”

The path to visa waivers runs through DHS and can take years to navigate. 
For Chile, it was three years, a government official said on a 
not-for-attribution basis; for Taiwan, “several.” Requirements include 
“enhanced law enforcement and security-related data sharing with the United 
States; timely reporting of lost and stolen passports; and the maintenance 
of high counterterrorism, law enforcement, border control, aviation and 
document security standards,” a DHS statement said.

Israel is not even close to meeting those standards, a congressional aide 
said. “You’ve got to have machine-readable passports in place—the 
e-passports with a data chip in them. The Israelis have only just started 
to issue them to diplomats and senior officials and so forth, and that 
probably won’t be rolled out to the rest of their population for another 10 
years.”

But U.S. counterspies will get the final word. And since Israel is as 
likely to stop spying here as it is to give up matzo for Passover, the visa 
barriers are likely to stay up.

As Paul Pillar, the CIA’s former national intelligence officer for the Near 
East and South Asia, told Newsweek, old habits are hard to break: Zionists 
were dispatching spies to America before there even was an Israel, to 
gather money and materials for the cause and later the fledgling state. Key 
components for Israel’s nuclear bombs were clandestinely obtained here. 
“They’ve found creative and inventive ways,” Pillar said, to get what they 
want.

“If we give them free rein to send people over here, how are we going to 
stop that?” the former congressional aide asked. “They’re incredibly 
aggressive. They’re aggressive in all aspects of their relationship with 
the United States. Why would their intelligence relationship with us be any 
different?”

On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 1:54:33 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> http://thecipherbrief.com/article/cyber-espionage
>
>  
>
> *Expert Commentary* 
> Cyber Espionage
>
> January 3, 2016 | John Sipher
>
>   
>
> [image: Description: 
> http://thecipherbrief.com/sites/default/files/styles/headshot_-_article/public/sipher_2.jpg?itok=2z3SbUbG]
>  
> <http://thecipherbrief.com/expert/John-Sipher>
>
>
> *John SipherFormer Member, CIA’s Senior Intelligence Service 
> <http://thecipherbrief.com/expert/John-Sipher>*
>
>  
>
> For years, I slept fitfully after a “friend” told me that it wasn’t the 
> noisy mosquitos buzzing in my ears at night that were a problem.  Instead, 
> it was the female mosquitos that made no noise at all but laid eggs in your 
> ears at night.  That image wrecked my sleep until the Internet helped me to 
> dispel the myth years later.
>
> The cyber threat is a little like the silent mosquito.  The biggest 
> dangers are the ones that you will never know about.
>
> However, if you follow the public discourse on the nature of the cyber 
> threat to the U.S., it seems that the bulk of the dialogue has to do with 
> the issue of hackers and the thousands of daily thwarted attacks against 
> government and private computer systems.  It is almost as if the danger is 
> easily detected, and a better password and up-to-date antivirus software 
> can solve the problem.
>
> However, the far bigger threat is from foreign intelligence and terrorist 
> groups, who have the talent, resources, and wherewithal to do serious 
> damage to U.S. interests – damage we may never realize until it is too 
> late.  While we publically frame the problem by citing how many attacks are 
> observed every day, the far bigger problem is hidden.  An intelligence 
> organization’s job is to pick your pocket without you ever knowing anything 
> is amiss.  You won’t make it very far as an intelligence officer if your 
> adversary becomes aware of your activities.
>
> Of the capable organizations that are determined to do us harm, perhaps 
> the most competent, dedicated, and focused is Russia’s Special 
> Communications Service, the Russian equivalent of the U.S. National 
> Security Agency (NSA).
>
> Russia doesn’t do many things well (dancing bears, perhaps).  Spying, 
> however, is a Russian specialty honed by decades of experience controlling 
> its population and stealing from the West.  The U.S. has been their main 
> enemy since WWII and remains so today.  Indeed, while we more often hear 
> about Chinese cyber activities, the Russian cyber espionage enterprise is 
> far more sophisticated and capable than its Chinese counterpart, according 
> to statements by U.S. intelligence officials. 
>
> Unlike in the U.S., the Russian espionage effort is central to its foreign 
> policy, and its offensive cyber capability is a particularly powerful 
> weapon that is used to challenge the U.S. across the board.  Indeed, the 
> Russian NSA equivalent is used for – among other things - cyber warfare, 
> espionage, counterintelligence, internal control of its citizens, 
> disinformation, and propaganda.  Russia’s cyber attacks – both blatant and 
> stealthy – are used to achieve geopolitical ends and to maintain an 
> asymmetric ability to damage the U.S.
>
> The Russians have shown a willingness to use the cyber weapons at their 
> disposal, and have done so effectively.  In 2007, the Russians swamped 
> Estonian computer systems to express their anger at perceived Estonian 
> disrespect of Russian symbols.  A year later, they combined sophisticated 
> cyber intrusions with their military attack against Georgian forces.  More 
> recently, they used offensive cyber tools to support their aggressive 
> annexation of Crimea and eastern Ukraine.  We even witnessed Russian cyber 
> probing of top U.S. financial institutions in 2013.
>
> Internally, the Russians use cyber weapons to maintain control over their 
> population.  By law, all private encryption equipment in Russia is required 
> to be licensed by Russian Intelligence.  Likewise, all internet providers 
> in Russia have to install hardware/equipment provided by the Russian NSA 
> equivalent (and pay for it themselves).  There is no such thing as privacy 
> in Russia.
>
> While the U.S. Government is probably the biggest target of Russian cyber 
> spying, you can be confident that they go after anyone and anything that 
> can help them get what they need.  They surely steal directly from Yahoo, 
> Google, Facebook, and social media platforms.  If they want to collect 
> compromising information on a person in a bank, military unit, national 
> laboratory, or nuclear power plant, you can be sure that they are swimming 
> in e-mail and personal data that can help them craft an approach to that 
> individual. 
>
> At the same time, the Russians are collecting the capability to understand 
> and possibly disrupt our power grid, air traffic control, oil and gas 
> infrastructure, and transit networks.  Additionally, recent reports cite a 
> significant increase in Russian submarine surveillance activity in the 
> vicinity of the strategic underwater fiber cables that facilitate 
> commercial and classified communications.  This aggressive effort has 
> intensified fears of Russian efforts to tap or cut these critical deep sea 
> communication conduits that carry trillions of dollars a day in global 
> business.
>
> The only real way to protect ourselves from this kind of sophisticated 
> cyber warfare is a robust public-private partnership between our 
> intelligence and law enforcement services, and those companies that provide 
> the backbone of our computer networks.  In this sense, perhaps the most 
> damaging of Edward Snowden’s many traitorous acts was to destroy the trust 
> between the private sector and our security professionals.  We are now 
> talking past each other, and the Russians, Chinese, Iranians, and others 
> are having a field day.  Until those key relationships and trust is 
> restored, we will remain in a vulnerable state.
>
> So, the next time you hear a story about hackers attacking various 
> computer networks, think of the buzzing mosquito, and remember that there 
> is probably something much more dangerous happening away from public notice.
>
>  
>
> The Author is John Sipher
>
> John Sipher is a senior project leader at the McChrystal Group.  John 
> retired in 2014 after a 28-year career in the Central Intelligence Agency’s 
> National Clandestine Service. At the time of his retirement he was a member 
> of the CIA’s Senior Intelligence Service.  John served multiple overseas 
> tours as Chief of Station and Deputy Chief of Station in Europe, Asia, 
> Southeast Asia, the Balkans, and South Asia. He is the recipient of the 
> Agency's Distinguished Career Intelligence Medal.
>
>  
>
>
> __._,_.___
> ------------------------------
> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> 
> ------------------------------
>
>
> Visit Your Group 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZHZhc2drBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTE5MzUzMTk->
>  
>    
>    
> [image: Yahoo! Groups] 
> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNXYwazBtBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MTkzNTMxOQ-->
>  
> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • 
> Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use 
> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> 
>
> __,_._,___
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to