As religious historian Philip Jenkins points out, there's really no comparison between the the Bible and the Qu'ran with regard to the message. If you're measuring violence, the Qu'ran still wins hands down!
It is true that the first five Books of the Bible could be construed as violent, but this was long before the Birth of Christ, or the Birth of Mohammad. Christ, unlike Mohammad, brought a loving, caring and peaceful message, whereas Mohammad brings violence, death and destruction. I must be missing the point here.....Comparison of Apples to Freight Cars..... On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:15 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > Is The Bible More Violent Than The Quran? > BARBARA BRADLEY HAGERTY > <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788#> > Listen to the Story > <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788#> > > All Things Considered <http://www.npr.org/programs/all-things-considered/> > *7:23* > > - Playlist > <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788#> > - Download > <http://pd.npr.org/anon.npr-mp3/npr/atc/2010/03/20100318_atc_14.mp3?dl=1> > - Embed > <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788#> > - Transcript > <http://www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=124494788> > > [image: Pages of the Gutenberg Bible.] > > Pages of the Gutenberg Bible in Colmar, France. Religious historian Philip > Jenkins says scriptures from the Bible are more violent than those from the > Quran. > Johanna Leguerre/AFP/Getty Images > > As the hijackers boarded the airplanes on Sept. 11, 2001, they had a lot > on their minds. And if they were following instructions, one of those > things was the Quran. > > In preparation for the suicide attack, their handlers had told them to > meditate on two chapters of the Quran in which God tells Muslims to "cast > terror into the hearts of unbelievers." > > "Slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, arrest them, besiege them, and > lie in ambush everywhere for them," Allah instructs the Prophet Muhammad > (Quran, 9:5). He continues: "Prophet! Make war on the unbelievers and the > hypocrites! ... Hell shall be their home, an evil fate." > > When Osama bin Laden declared war on the West in 1996, he cited the > Quran's command to "strike off" the heads of unbelievers. More recently, > U.S. Army Maj. Nidal Hasan lectured his colleagues about jihad, or "holy > war," and the Quran's exhortation to fight unbelievers and bring them low. > Hasan is accused of killing 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, last year. > > Given this violent legacy, religion historian Philip Jenkins decided to > compare the brutality quotient of the Quran and the Bible. > > *Defense Vs. Total Annihilation* > > "Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually > far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible," Jenkins says. > > Jenkins is a professor at Penn State University and author of two books > dealing with the issue: the recently published *Jesus Wars*, and *Dark > Passages *, which has not been published but is already drawing > controversy. > > Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were actually far > less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible. > > Philip Jenkins, author of 'Jesus Wars' > > Violence in the Quran, he and others say, is largely a defense against > attack. > > "By the standards of the time, which is the 7th century A.D., the laws of > war that are laid down by the Quran are actually reasonably humane," he > says. "Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find something that is > for many people a real surprise. There is a specific kind of warfare laid > down in the Bible which we can only call genocide." > > It is called *herem,* and it means total annihilation. Consider the Book > of 1 Samuel, when God instructs King Saul to attack the Amalekites: "And > utterly destroy all that they have, and do not spare them," God says > through the prophet Samuel. "But kill both man and woman, infant and > nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and donkey." > > When Saul failed to do that, God took away his kingdom. > > "In other words," Jenkins says, "Saul has committed a dreadful sin by > failing to complete genocide. And that passage echoes through Christian > history. It is often used, for example, in American stories of the > confrontation with Indians — not just is it legitimate to kill Indians, but > you are violating God's law if you do not." > > Jenkins notes that the history of Christianity is strewn with *herem.* During > the Crusades in the Middle Ages, the Catholic popes declared the Muslims > Amalekites. In the great religious wars in the 16th, 17th and 19th > centuries, Protestants and Catholics each believed the other side were the > Amalekites and should be utterly destroyed. > > *'Holy Amnesia'* > > But Jenkins says, even though the Bible is violent, Christianity and > Judaism today are not for the most part. > > "What happens in all religions as they grow and mature and expand, they go > through a process of forgetting of the original violence, and I call this a > process of holy amnesia," Jenkins says. > [image: Philip Jenkins, the author of 'Jesus Wars']i > <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788#> > > Jenkins, author of *Jesus Wars*, says that violence in the Quran is > largely a defense against attack. > Courtesy of HarperOne > > They make the violence symbolic: Wiping out the enemy becomes wiping out > one's own sins. Jenkins says that until recently, Islam had the same sort > of holy amnesia, and many Muslims interpreted jihad, for example, as an > internal struggle, not physical warfare. > > Andrew Bostom calls this analysis "preposterous." Bostom, editor of *The > Legacy of Jihad*, says there's a major difference between the Bible, > which describes the destruction of an enemy at a point in time, and the > Quran, which urges an ongoing struggle to defeat unbelievers. > > "It's an aggressive doctrine," he says. "The idea is to impose Islamic law > on the globe." > > Take suicide attacks, he says — a tactic that Muslim radicals have used to > great effect in the U.S., Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East. It's true > that suicide from depression is forbidden in Islam — but Bostom says the > Quran and the Hadith, or the sayings of Muhammad, do allow self-destruction > for religious reasons. > > "The notion of jihad martyrdom is extolled in the Quran, Quran verse > 9:1-11. And then in the Hadith, it's even more explicit. This is the > highest form of jihad — to kill and to be killed in acts of jihad." > > *'Out Of Context'* > > That may be the popular notion of jihad, says Waleed El-Ansary, but it's > the wrong one. El-Ansary, who teaches Islamic studies at the University of > South Carolina, says the Quran explicitly condemns religious aggression and > the killing of civilians. And it makes the distinction between jihad — > legal warfare with the proper rules of engagement — and *irjaf*, or > terrorism. > > "All of those types of incidences — [Sept. 11], Maj. Nidal Hasan and so > forth — those are all examples of *irjaf*, not jihad," he says. According > to the Quran, he says, those who practice *irjaf* "are going to hell." > > So what's going on here? After all, we all have images of Muslim radicals > flying planes into buildings, shooting up soldiers at Fort Hood, trying to > detonate a bomb on an airplane on Christmas Day. How to reconcile a > peaceful Quran with these violent acts? > > El-Ansary says that in the past 30 years, there's been a perfect storm > that has created a violent strain of Islam. The first is political: > frustration at Western intervention in the Muslim world. The second is > intellectual: the rise of Wahhabi Islam, a more fundamentalist > interpretation of Islam subscribed to by Osama bin Laden. El-Ansary says > fundamentalists have distorted Islam for political purposes. > > "Basically what they do is they take verses out of context and then use > that to justify these egregious actions," he says. > > El-Ansary says we are seeing more religious violence from Muslims now > because the Islamic world is far more religious than is the West. Still, > Jenkins says Judeo-Christian cultures shouldn't be smug. The Bible has > plenty of violence. > > "The scriptures are still there, dormant, but not dead," he says, "and > they can be resurrected at any time. Witness the white supremacists who > cite the murderous Phineas when calling for racial purity, or an > anti-abortion activist when shooting a doctor who performs abortions. > > In the end, the scholars can agree on one thing: The DNA of early Judaism, > Christianity and Islam code for a lot of violence. Whether they can evolve > out of it is another thing altogether. > Excerpt: 'Jesus Wars' > Updated July 15, 20115:01 AM ETPublished March 18, 201011:34 AM ET > PHILIP JENKINS > [image: 'Jesus Wars'] > > *Introduction* > > *Who Do You Say That I Am?* > > Jesus once asked his disciples, "Who do people say that I am?" They > answered that all sorts of stories were circulating — that he was a > prophet, perhaps Elijah or John the Baptist come back to earth. "But," he > asked, "Who do you say that I am?" Over the past two thousand years, > Christians have formulated many different answers to this question. Yes, > most believe Jesus was a human being, but at the same time he was also God, > one of the three persons of the Trinity. He was both God and man. > *JESUS WARS: HOW FOUR PATRIARCHS, THREE QUEENS, AND TWO EMPERORS DECIDED > WHAT CHRISTIANS WOULD BELIEVE FOR THE NEXT 1,500 YEARS* > BY PHILIP JENKINS > HARDCOVER, 352 PAGES > HARPERONE > LIST PRICE: $26.99 > > But when we have said that, we have raised more questions than we have > answered, as the basic belief in Jesus Christ demands combining two utterly > different categories of being. Such a transgression of boundaries puzzles > and shocks believers of other faiths, especially strict monotheists such as > Muslims and Jews. But even those Christians who accept the basic concept > probably could not explain it with anything like the precision demanded by > early church councils. By those rigorous standards, virtually all modern > nonspecialists (including many clergy) would soon lapse into grave heresy. > . . . > > So was Jesus a Man-bearing God, or a God-bearing man? Between those > extreme poles lay any number of other answers, which competed furiously > through the first Christian centuries. By 400, most Christians agreed that > Jesus Christ was in some sense divine, and that he had both a human nature > (Greek, physis) and a divine nature. But that belief allowed for a wide > variety of interpretations, and if events had developed differently — if > great councils had decided other than they actually did — any one of these > various approaches might have established itself as orthodoxy. In the > context of the time, cultural and political pressures were pushing strongly > toward the idea of Christ-as-God, so that only with real difficulty could > the memory of the human Jesus be maintained. Historically, it is very > remarkable that mainstream orthodoxy came out so strongly in favor of > asserting Christ's full humanity. > Related NPR Stories > Is The Bible More Violent Than The Quran? > <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788>March 18, > 2010 > > And yet it did just that. When most modern churches explain their > understanding of Christ's identity — their Christology — they turn to a > common body of ready-made interpretations, an ancient collection of texts > laid down in the fifth century. At a great council held in 451 at Chalcedon > (near modern Istanbul), the church formulated the statement that eventually > became the official theology of the Roman Empire. This acknowledges Christ > in two natures, which joined together in one person. Two natures existed, > "without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; > the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the union, but > rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming > together to form one person." > > We cannot speak of Christ without declaring his full human nature, which > was not even slightly diluted or abolished by the presence of divinity. > That Chalcedonian definition today stands as the official formula for the > vast majority of Christians, whether they are Protestant, Catholic, or > Orthodox — although how many of those believers could explain the > definition clearly is open to debate. But as we are told, Chalcedon settled > any controversy about the identity of Christ, so that henceforward any > troublesome passages in the Bible or early tradition had to be read in the > spirit of those powerful words. For over 1,500 years now, Chalcedon has > provided the answer to Jesus' great question. > > But Chalcedon was not the only possible solution, nor was it an obvious > or, perhaps, a logical one. Only the political victory of Chalcedon's > supporters allowed that council's ideas to become the inevitable lens > through which later generations interpret the Christian message. It remains > quite possible to read the New Testament and find very different > Christologies, which by definition arose from churches very close to Jesus' > time, and to his thought world. In particular, we easily find passages that > suggest that the man > > Jesus achieved Godhood at a specific moment during his life, or indeed > after his earthly death. > > In political terms, the most important critics of Chalcedon were those who > stressed Christ's one divine nature, and from the Greek words for "one > nature," we call them Monophysites. Not only were Monophysites numerous and > influential, but they dominated much of the Christian world and the Roman > Empire long after Chalcedon had done its work, and they were only defeated > after decades of bloody struggle. Centuries after Chalcedon, Monophysites > continued to prevail in the most ancient regions of Christianity, such as > Syria, Palestine, and Egypt. The heirs of the very oldest churches, the > ones with the most direct and authentic ties to the apostolic age, found > their distinctive interpretation of Christ ruled as heretical. Pedigree > counted for little in these struggles. > > Each side persecuted its rivals when it had the opportunity to do so, and > tens of thousands — at least — perished. Christ's nature was a cause for > which people were prepared to kill and to die, to persecute or to suffer > martyrdom. Modern Christians rarely feel much sympathy for either side in > such bygone religious wars. Did the issues at stake really matter enough to > justify bloodshed? Yet obviously, people at the time had no such qualms and > cared passionately about how believers were supposed to understand the > Christ they worshipped. Failing to understand Christ's natures properly > made nonsense of everything Christians treasured: the content of salvation > and redemption, the character of liturgy and Eucharist, the figure of the > Virgin Mary. Each side had its absolute truth, faith in which was essential > to salvation. > > Horror stories about Christian violence abound in other eras, with the > Crusades and Inquisition as prime exhibits; but the intra- Christian > violence of the fifth- and sixth-century debates was on a far larger and > more systematic scale than anything produced by the Inquisition and > occurred at a much earlier stage of church history. When Edward Gibbon > wrote his classic account of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, he > reported countless examples of Christian violence and fanaticism. This is > his account of the immediate aftermath of Chalcedon: > > Jerusalem was occupied by an army of [Monophysite] monks; in the name of > the one incarnate Nature, they pillaged, they burnt, they murdered; the > sepulchre of Christ was defiled with blood. . . . On the third day before > the festival of Easter, the [Alexandrian] patriarch was besieged in the > cathedral, and murdered in the baptistery. The remains of his mangled > corpse were delivered to the flames, and his ashes to the wind; and the > deed was inspired by the vision of a pretended angel. . . . This deadly > superstition was inflamed, on either side, by the principle and the > practice of retaliation: in the pursuit of a metaphysical quarrel, many > thousands were slain. > > Chalcedonians behaved at least as badly in their campaigns to enforce > their particular orthodoxy. In the eastern city of Amida, a Chalcedonian > bishop dragooned dissidents, to the point of burning them alive. His most > diabolical scheme involving taking lepers, "hands festering and dripping > with blood and pus," and billeting them on the Monophysite faithful until > they saw reason. > > Even the Eucharist became a vital component of religious terror. > Throughout the long religious wars, people were regularly (and frequently) > reading others out of the church, declaring formal anathemas, and the sign > for this was admitting or not admitting people to communion. In extreme > episodes, communion was enforced by physical violence, so that the > Eucharist, which is based upon ideas of self-giving and self-sacrifice, > became an instrument of oppression. A sixth-century historian records how > the forces of Constantinople's Chalcedonian patriarch struck at Monophysite > religious houses in the capital. Furnished with supplies of consecrated > bread, the patriarch's clergy were armed and dangerous. They "dragged and > pulled [the nuns] by main force to make them receive the communion at their > hands. And they all fled like birds before the hawk, and cowered down in > corners, wailing and saying, 'We cannot communicate with the synod of > Chalcedon, which divides Christ our God into two Natures after the union, > and teaches a Quaternity instead of the Holy Trinity.'" But their protests > were useless. "They were dragged up to communicate; and when they held > their hands above their heads, in spite of their screams their hands were > seized, and they were dragged along, uttering shrieks of lamentation, and > sobs, and loud cries, and struggling to escape. And so the sacrament was > thrust by force into the mouths of some, in spite of their screams, while > others threw themselves on their faces upon the ground, and cursed every > one who required them to communicate by force." They might take the > Eucharist kicking and screaming — literally — but once they had eaten, they > were officially in communion with Chalcedon and with the church that > preached that doctrine. > > On Saturday, January 2, 2016 at 7:04:35 AM UTC-6, Travis wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *http://tinyurl.com/j6csge6 <http://tinyurl.com/j6csge6>* >> >> >> >> >> Terror! <http://takimag.com/topic/terror>10 Violent Koran Verses and the >> Terror They Spawned >> <http://takimag.com/article/10_violent_koran_verses_and_the_terror_they_spawned_gavin_mcinnes> >> >> by Gavin McInnes <http://takimag.com/contributor/gavinmcinnes/151> [image: >> Description: http://takimag.com/images/global/feed-32x32.png] >> <http://takimag.com/contributors/contributor_feed/gavinmcinnes/> >> >> January 01, 2016 >> >> Multiple Pages >> <http://takimag.com/article/10_violent_koran_verses_and_the_terror_they_spawned_gavin_mcinnes> >> >> [image: Description: 10 Violent Koran Verses and the Terror They Spawned] >> photo credit: Shutterstock >> >> I recently interviewed Jihad Watch’s Robert Spencer and we went through *10 >> examples* <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ES9_xe0OhIs> of the Koran >> being violent. After the video went live, we got all the common refrains >> about how the Bible is even worse and the Crusades this and the Old >> Testament that and Hoseah 13:16 and Psalms 137:9 encourage us *to* >> <https://twitter.com/YoBobby85/status/682020919007666177> “bash babies >> against rocks,” etc., etc. >> >> All right, fine. Just for fun, let’s pretend the Old Testament was even >> worse than the Koran and we were way more barbaric 500 years ago. How about >> what Islam is doing today? The Western world has moved forward since the >> days of fire and brimstone, but the Middle East is turning backward toward >> it. There are a lot of reasons for this, but their handbook is a great >> place to start. Here are 10 examples of Koran quotes coming to life right >> now. >> >> *(1) “Fight against those who do not obey Allah and do not believe in >> Allah or the Last Day and do not forbid what has been forbidden by Allah >> and His messenger even if they are of the People of the Book until they pay >> the Jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.” 9:29* >> >> *This week* >> <http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/12/28/mob-rips-apart-afghan-woman-falsely-accused-burning-koran/> >> a woman “of the book” was accused of destroying said book and promptly >> beaten to death by those who “obey Allah.” Farkhunda Malikzada was a devout >> student of Islam and had chastised fellow Muslims for trafficking Viagra >> and condoms. They got out of it by pretending she was burning the Koran and >> that’s when all hell broke loose. You’d’ve thunk she created a sculpture >> called *Piss Muhammad* or made the prophet’s mother out of elephant dung >> the way they stomped her bloody face into unconsciousness. >> >> *(2) “When the sacred months have passed, then kill the Mushrikin >> wherever you find them. Capture them. Besiege them. Lie in wait for them in >> each and every ambush but if they repent, and perform the prayers, and give >> zacat then leave their way free.” 9:5* >> >> In 2002, John Muhammad, the Beltway Sniper, lay “in wait” for various >> Mushrikin and killed at least 17 of them. Calculating the sacred months >> looks incredibly complicated and I think it’s different for Muharram, >> Rajab, Dhul Qadah, and blah blah blah so I’m not sure if he committed these >> acts of terror before or after 2002’s sacred months had passed. >> >> “The Western world has moved forward since the days of fire and >> brimstone, but the Middle East is turning backward toward it.” >> >> *(3) “They ask you about fighting during the sacred months. Tell them, >> fighting therein is a great sin but a greater sin is to prevent mankind >> from following the way of Allah, to disbelieve in him.” 2:217* >> >> Oh, whoops, turns out the sacred-months thing is bullshit. So basically >> the instructions can be boiled down to “Kill the nonbelievers wherever you >> find them.” I don’t recall that passage being in the Bible, but if it is, >> it certainly hasn’t been explicitly stated as a motive for mass murder in a >> long-ass time. If you’re looking to attach deaths to this caveat, throw in >> John Muhammad’s sidekick, Lee Boyd Malvo. >> >> *(4) “Kill them wherever you find them and drive them out from where they >> drove you out. Persecution is worse than slaughter.” 2:191* >> >> Terrence J. McNeil never committed the terrorist attack he linked to the >> above verse, but that’s only because men with guns prevented him. With the >> *words* >> <http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ohio-man-arrested-soliciting-murder-members-us-military> >> “Kill them wherever you find them,” he uploaded the names and addresses of >> 100 military personnel and was arrested. >> >> *(5) “When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks.” 47:4* >> >> The image of ISIS marching Christians along the beach before beheading >> them is one of the most disturbing snuff films of all time (although it >> can’t hold a candle to the guys being burned alive in cages). The Islamic >> State has committed *hundreds* >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISIL_beheading_incidents> of beheadings >> in the past two years despite it being such a cumbersome and time-consuming >> way to kill someone. This is likely because firing squads were unheard-of >> when 47:4 was written. >> >> *(6) “When your Lord revealed to the angels, ‘Truly I am with you. So, >> keep firm those who have believed. I will strike terror into the hearts of >> those who have disbelieved. So, strike them at the necks and cut off their >> fingers.’” 8:12* >> >> No, this isn’t a Metallica song, it’s what the *Oklahoma beheader* >> <http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/10/30/muslim-oklahoma-beheading-defendant-found-competent-face-trial/> >> had on his Facebook page before he went out and cut off Colleen Hufford’s >> head. Of course, the liberal media claimed Jah’Keem Yisreal was committing >> *workplace >> violence* >> <http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2014/09/30/mainstream-media-continues-to-call-oklahoma-beheading-workplace-violence/> >> and that this had nothing to do with the Koran. >> >> *(7) “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women because Allah has >> made one superior to the other and because they spend to support them from >> their means. Therefore, righteous women are obedient and they guard in the >> husband’s absence what Allah orders them to guard. And, as to those women >> from whom you fear disobedience, give them a warning, send them to separate >> beds, and beat them.” 4:34* >> >> Why feminists haven’t devoted 100% of their anger toward Islam boggles >> the mind. Is forcing women to wear black polyester bags in desert heat and >> then stoning them to death for being raped not at least a little bit >> sexist? The list of men letting 4:34 run their marriage is endless so I’ll >> throw a dart at it and pick the guy who *stomped his wife’s head in* >> <http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=397_1376586404> because she joined him >> in a song (link NSFW). >> >> *(8) “Oh you who believe, fight those of the disbelievers who are close >> to you and let them find harshness in you.” 9:123* >> >> You’d think Muslim convert Michael Adebolajo and fellow convert Michael >> Adebowale would have cited “smite their necks” as the impetus for hacking >> off Lee Rigby’s head, but they attached a *couple dozen others* >> <https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2014/03/01/lee-rigby-analyzing-muslim-killers-letter-with-quran-verses-to-murder-witness/> >> as responsible, including 9:123. That’s the beauty of the Koran. If you >> skip over one violent passage, there are plenty more that fit the bill. The >> left is so determined to forgive this violence and pin it on something >> else, terrorists are forced to handwrite the specific passages and hand >> them over to the authorities. When they killed Theo van Gogh, they were >> forced to impale *their note* >> <http://www.militantislammonitor.org/article/id/312> to his body with a >> rapier. In that sense, liberals are helping to fight the terrorists by >> annoying the shit out of them. >> >> *(9) “Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. Those who follow Him are merciful >> to one another but harsh to the disbeliever.” 48:29* >> >> When Westerners convert to Islam they are often seen as enlightened. In >> fact, if you truly understand multiculturalism and tolerance you’ll become >> a Muslim and join ISIS the way Sweden’s Multicultural Center Expert Mike >> Skråmo, a.k.a. *Abo Ibrahim Al Swedi* >> <http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/251905/swedens-multicultural-center-expert-islamophobia-daniel-greenfield>, >> did. >> >> However, when Muslims convert to Christianity, “those who follow Him” >> quickly cease to be “merciful” and get real “harsh” real fast. This summer, >> Pakistani bride Nadia Masih’s conversion to Christianity was met with a >> *bullet* >> <http://www.christianpost.com/news/christian-man-killed-by-muslim-in-laws-after-wife-gives-her-life-to-jesus-143906/> >> from her family and a dead Christian husband who had also been tortured by >> them. >> >> *(10) “They wish that you would reject faith as they have rejected faith >> unless that you would all be equal. So, don’t take protectors from them >> unless they emigrate in the way of Allah but if they turn back, then seize >> them and kill them wherever you find them.” 4:89* >> >> The story we’re getting from the Syrian-refugee sympathizers is it’s just >> a few lost souls striving for a better life. They won’t come here and >> *rape* >> <http://www.infowars.com/sweden-syrian-migrant-brutally-rapes-woman-while-spitting-in-her-face/> >> en masse and they’re not here to spread the caliphate. They’re here to >> help. This is a very cute version of events, and it’s willfully naive. >> Democrats say we’re fearmongering and that statistically it is virtually >> impossible for me personally to be the victim of a terrorist attack. Though >> it is true that I will never be raped in Sweden, I still don’t want that to >> happen to anyone else. Call me a feminazi if you must. Few of the Syrian >> refugees are Syrian and few are in Europe to assimilate. They are there >> because the Koran explicitly states that Muslims must spread Islam across >> the world. If any of these refugees change their mind and feel like coming >> back, 4:89 makes it very clear what must be done. >> >> Our foreign policy is likely a factor in Muslim rage, but they’ve been >> behaving like this off and on for centuries. *Inbreeding* >> <http://takimag.com/article/trouble_with_islam/print#axzz3vl01jbk5> >> doesn’t help things, but the one constant we have with all this Muslim >> violence is a manifesto explaining exactly what to do (I’m not even >> including all the *Koran offshoots* >> <http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/07/chattanooga-jihad-murderer-texted-islamic-verse-to-friend-before-attack> >> that inspired other acts of violence). You can have all the strange >> bedfellows you want, but there is one in particular who can’t wait to >> strangle you in your sleep. Wake up or die. >> >> >> >> Please share this article by using the link below. When you cut and paste >> an article, Taki's Magazine misses out on traffic, and our writers don't >> get paid for their work. Email [email protected] to buy additional >> rights. >> http://takimag.com/article/10_violent_koran_verses_and_the_terror_they_spawned_gavin_mcinnes/print#ixzz3w2RIcAny >> >> >> __._,_.___ >> ------------------------------ >> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> Visit Your Group >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmb2FzZXFrBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTE2OTA5OTM-> >> >> >> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMWNjcnZwBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MTY5MDk5Mw--> >> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >> >> __,_._,___ >> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
