The left's multicultural vision made this mess possible --- *"For over 100 years now, Jews in America have been promoting multiculturalism as a strategy for weakening the dominant culture and thereby enhancing Jewish power."*
The main way in which Jews promoted multiculturalism is by changing this nation's immigration laws. "Jews have been 'the single most persistent pressure group favoring a liberal immigration policy' in the US in the entire immigration debate beginning in 1881." According to [Sheldon M] Neuringer: "Immigration had constituted a prime object of concern for practically every major Jewish defense and community relations organization. Over the years their spokesmen had assiduously attended congressional hearings and the Jewish effort was of the utmost importance in establishing and financing such nonsectarian groups as the National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons." According to Nathan C. Belth: "In Congress, through all the years when the immigration battles were being fought, the names of Jewish legislators were in the forefront of the liberal forces: from Adolph Sabath to Samuel Dickstein and Emanuel Celler in the House and from Herbert H. Lehman to Jacob Javits in the Senate. Each in this time was leader of the ADL and of major organizations concerned with democratic development." The Jewish promotion of multiculturalism in America had two main goals: 1) "maximizing the number of Jewish immigrants" and 2) "opening up the US to immigration from all of the peoples of the world." Both goals paradoxically used "diversity" as a stalking horse to advance Jewish ethnocentrism. The whole point of multiculturalism is not so much the promotion of diversity as it is the demographic dilution of homogeneity. Representative Leavitt saw through the diversity ploy when he complained that the Jews were "the one great historic people who have maintained the identity of their race throughout centuries because they believe sincerely that they are a chosen people, with certain ideals to maintain, and knowing that the loss of racial identity means a change of ideals." The purpose of multiculturalism has always been to subvert coherent cultures, weaken the majority, and thereby enhance the Jews' power. "Ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interest because Jews become just one of many ethnic groups. This results in the diffusion of political and cultural influence among the various ethnic and religious groups, and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive groups of gentiles united in their opposition to Judaism. Historically, major anti-Semitic movements have tended to erupt in societies that have been, apart from the Jews, religiously and/or ethnically homogeneous." The early opponents of multiculturalism also feared Jews as agents of cultural subversion: "Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by men who came here on the crest of the south and east European immigration. They produce our horrible film stories; they compose and dish out to us our jazz music, they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines and newspapers." Jewish immigrants were also "widely perceived to be ... disproportionately involved in radical political movements," a fact often acknowledged by the Jewish press. In one of its editorials, The American Hebrew pointed out that "we must not forget the immigrants form Russia and Austria will becoming from countries infested with Bolshevism, and it will require more than a superficial effort to make good citizens out of them." The fact that Jewish immigrants form Eastern Europe were viewed as "infected with Bolshevism. . . unpatriotic, alien, unassimilable" resulted in a wave of anti-Semitism in the 1920s and contributed to the restrictive immigration legislation of the period. Almost a decade after the immigration debate ended with the triumph of the restrictionists in 1924, Jewish immigration was still having consequences for American identity. As MacDonald points out, "In Philadelphia in the 1930s, fully 72.2 percent of the Communist Party members were the children of Jewish immigrants who came to the US in the late 19th and early 20th century." - See more at: On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-tribal-war-with-islam.html > > > Monday, January 11, 2016The Tribal War with Islam > <http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-tribal-war-with-islam.html> > > Posted by *Daniel Greenfield* > > All wars are wars of equals. > > That's true in the sense that each side attacks the other in terms of how > it defines itself as an entity. States try to destroy other states. > Religions fight other religions. Ethnic groups and races engage in > genocide. They do this even when the other side does not see itself in the > same terms. > > The United States tried to fight guerrillas and terrorists as if they were > modern states with their own industrial military organizations protecting > their industrial core. This tactic made no sense in Vietnam or even Iraq > because that wasn't the enemy we were facing. But states are built to fight > other states. Tribes are built to fight other tribes. Religions are built > to fight other religions. > > The modern multicultural super-tolerant western state of this century > takes stock of its strongest point, and decides that it's not the old > industrial machine, which destroys the environment, its traditional > heritage, which is problematic, or its problem solving skills, which are > too technical, but its values of super-tolerant multiculturalism. And so it > wages war on those insane terms. > > The old Western model of war was brutal and efficient. Protect the > industrial plant. Use it to churn out more military hardware. Smash the > enemy. > *The new Western model of war is protect social harmony. Create more > diversity. And the enemy will eventually be drawn into our global harmony.* > When liberals take every terror attack as an opportunity to lecture us on > the vital importance of not losing "our values", they are in their own > warped and useless way waging war. > > In the 20th century, war was distilled down to an industrial core. In the > 21st century, the anti-industrial rebels who want to de-industrialize > manufacturing while industrializing society, have distilled all that > matters down to their values. In their confused world order, the terrorists > are attacking "our values" and we in turn must attack "their values" with > our superior "values". > > Barely half the country accepts their construct of what "our values" are > and they have no idea whatsoever what "their values" are, but they assume > that just as our values are "our values" so too "their values" are also > "our values". This is the sort of thing you do if you're an ideologue. > > > *And also it's a natural human shortcut. It's human nature to assume that > people different from you are just dumber, nastier versions of yourself who > have the same basic goals and organization as you do.* > Ideologues are most likely to assume that everyone agrees with their > premises, but just hasn't been shown the right textbooks. And these days > ideologues and their textbooks dominate everything. > > To the left, Islam is an inefficient sort of Socialism dependent on > medieval superstition and lacking modern idea. To Muslims, the left is an > inefficient sort of Islam that's missing Allah, Mohammed and the Koran. > It's all just a problem of explanations and textbooks. > > The left plans to defeat ISIS with "our values" by which it means showing > how effective our social harmony is, which it isn't, by refusing to > actually fight Islamic terrorism. > *Eventually the Jihadists will give up their reactionary ways as the > ordinary Muslims realizes that he has the same interests as the rest of the > great rainbow coalition does. This hasn't even worked too well in Europe. * > The left is a purely ideological entity and so it has reduced our > countries and cultures to the transportable "our values". Despite Islam's > ideological reach, it's not purely an ideological entity. > > At the ground floor, Islam is tribal. The Iraqis viewed us as the American > Tribe. Tribes raid each other. Their members lash out and kill each other > over insults. They count coup on each other. They steal and humiliate each > other's women. Tribes are nomadic and they are concerned with honor. > > Tribes from Iraq, Syria and North Africa can come to Europe, set up their > own territories, pile up loot and then humiliate the native women for New > Year's Eve. And then laugh at the impotence of the European tribal > authorities. > > The Islamic no-go zones are seen primarily as religious, but they are also > tribal. Islam incorporates both. > *Islamic migration also expands tribal territories. It's always been that > way.* > And this is also how Muslims fight us on a tribal level. They attack the > honor of the European tribes. > *But it's not as if the Merkel government or any of the other European > Socialist governments have any concept of honor anyway.* > While European Socialists attempt to integrate them with "our values", the > ungrateful integratees show that the systems have no honor on a tribal > level and are not worth taking seriously. > > > > *Beyond the tribal, is the religious. In Islam, religion remains limited > to the most primitive level of "My tribal deity Allah is stronger than your > deity because we beat you up."This is literally what Allahu Akbar means.* > > To the representatives of the secular West, religion is identical with > "our values", which is to say that it contains nothing religious about it, > certainly no claims which require divine validation or unique truths. Their > religion is a spiritual background noise which affirms the essential > position that we should be nice to each other while providing support for > any leftist position of the moment. > > No meaningful dialogue is possible between Allahu Akbar and "Our values" > because the two are not speaking the same language except in one sense, > both insist on absolute submission. But the left's demand for submission is > based on the absolute moral superiority of "Our values". Islam literally > means submission, but its moral superiority is a revealed truth based on > Islam's military victories. > > > *Islam is right, because it won. It won, because it's right. There's your > cycle of violence in a nutshell.* > Islam sanctified the tribal raid as a religious act and turned the dead > into martyrs. That's Jihad. Terrorism incorporates both the tribal and the > religious. Islamic missionary activity in the West also targets > dissatisfied minorities, potential fifth columns, in the same manner as the > original Arab Islamic conquests did. Even here, Islam unites tribal and > religious tactics. > > The final element of the tribal war is organizational. It is here that > Islam attacks "Our values". > > Tribes are forever quarreling. They are weakest at their points of mutual > association. This is how Mohammed originally got his start. Islam expanded > initially more through clever games of divide and conquer than military > strategy. > > To the Muslim mind, we are a series of fragile tribal associations. That > is also how we appear to the "Our values" left. The "Our values" crowd > thinks of the threat in terms of "radicalization", but the real threat is > "integration". Mohammed did some of his best work by undermining from > within. > > To undermine a tribal association, you have to be a part of it. Then you > have to raise grievances, find other dissatisfied allies and eventually > promise them better treatment under Islam. > > That's what Mohammed did. It's what his followers are doing today. > > This is where groups like the Muslim Brotherhood play the long game while > ISIS plays the short game. > > The left's multicultural vision made this mess possible. It's also making > it worse. The left despises tribal thinking and yet its entire political > infrastructure is built on rewarding it. All Islamic organizations have had > to do is built on the left's own work, joining its coalitions as Islamic > groups, and then working to hijack them. The growing takeover of > #BlackLivesMatter by Muslim groups is one example of the phenomenon. > > Our enemies are not states and they will not fight us as states. To the > extent that they are tribal, they will fight us as tribes. To the extent > that they are religious, in a primitive sort of way, they will attack us > that way. But the real problem is that we are no longer states either. > Instead we are in the grip of a mystical deluded cult that squawks of "Our > values" while tribalizing and dividing us to push through discredited > economic and social policies. They have opened the gates to a cruel, > backward enemy. > > And in doing so, they have brought a tribal war into our own homelands. > > > > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected] <javascript:>> > ------------------------------ > > > Visit Your Group > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYXMzZWdyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTI2MjY4ODY-> > > > - New Members > > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJndjlxNzY5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDUyNjI2ODg2> > > 1 > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDRhdnE4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MjYyNjg4Ng--> > > • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> • > Unsubscribe <javascript:> • Terms of Use > <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> > > __,_._,___ > > > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
