Was Ted Kennedy a Jew in your mind?
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 3:51 PM, plainolamerican <[email protected]> wrote: > The left's multicultural vision made this mess possible > --- > *"For over 100 years now, Jews in America have been promoting > multiculturalism as a strategy for weakening the dominant culture and > thereby enhancing Jewish power."* > > The main way in which Jews promoted multiculturalism is by changing this > nation's immigration laws. > > "Jews have been 'the single most persistent pressure group favoring a > liberal immigration policy' in the US in the entire immigration debate > beginning in 1881." > > According to [Sheldon M] Neuringer: "Immigration had constituted a prime > object of concern for practically every major Jewish defense and community > relations organization. Over the years their spokesmen had assiduously > attended congressional hearings and the Jewish effort was of the utmost > importance in establishing and financing such nonsectarian groups as the > National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for > Displaced Persons." > > According to Nathan C. Belth: "In Congress, through all the years when the > immigration battles were being fought, the names of Jewish legislators were > in the forefront of the liberal forces: from Adolph Sabath to Samuel > Dickstein and Emanuel Celler in the House and from Herbert H. Lehman to > Jacob Javits in the Senate. Each in this time was leader of the ADL and of > major organizations concerned with democratic development." > > The Jewish promotion of multiculturalism in America had two main goals: > > 1) "maximizing the number of Jewish immigrants" and > > 2) "opening up the US to immigration from all of the peoples of the > world." Both goals paradoxically used "diversity" as a stalking horse to > advance Jewish ethnocentrism. The whole point of multiculturalism is not so > much the promotion of diversity as it is the demographic dilution of > homogeneity. > > Representative Leavitt saw through the diversity ploy when he complained > that the Jews were "the one great historic people who have maintained the > identity of their race throughout centuries because they believe sincerely > that they are a chosen people, with certain ideals to maintain, and knowing > that the loss of racial identity means a change of ideals." > > The purpose of multiculturalism has always been to subvert coherent > cultures, weaken the majority, and thereby enhance the Jews' power. > > "Ethnic and religious pluralism serves external Jewish interest because > Jews become just one of many ethnic groups. This results in the diffusion > of political and cultural influence among the various ethnic and religious > groups, and it becomes difficult or impossible to develop unified, cohesive > groups of gentiles united in their opposition to Judaism. Historically, > major anti-Semitic movements have tended to erupt in societies that have > been, apart from the Jews, religiously and/or ethnically homogeneous." > > The early opponents of multiculturalism also feared Jews as agents of > cultural subversion: "Our whole system of amusements has been taken over by > men who came here on the crest of the south and east European immigration. > They produce our horrible film stories; they compose and dish out to us our > jazz music, they write many of the books we read, and edit our magazines > and newspapers." > > Jewish immigrants were also "widely perceived to be ... disproportionately > involved in radical political movements," a fact often acknowledged by the > Jewish press. In one of its editorials, The American Hebrew pointed out > that "we must not forget the immigrants form Russia and Austria will > becoming from countries infested with Bolshevism, and it will require more > than a superficial effort to make good citizens out of them." > > The fact that Jewish immigrants form Eastern Europe were viewed as > "infected with Bolshevism. . . unpatriotic, alien, unassimilable" resulted > in a wave of anti-Semitism in the 1920s and contributed to the restrictive > immigration legislation of the period. Almost a decade after the > immigration debate ended with the triumph of the restrictionists in 1924, > Jewish immigration was still having consequences for American identity. As > MacDonald points out, "In Philadelphia in the 1930s, fully 72.2 percent of > the Communist Party members were the children of Jewish immigrants who came > to the US in the late 19th and early 20th century." - See more at: > > On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-6, Travis wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-tribal-war-with-islam.html >> >> >> Monday, January 11, 2016The Tribal War with Islam >> <http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2016/01/the-tribal-war-with-islam.html> >> >> Posted by *Daniel Greenfield* >> >> All wars are wars of equals. >> >> That's true in the sense that each side attacks the other in terms of how >> it defines itself as an entity. States try to destroy other states. >> Religions fight other religions. Ethnic groups and races engage in >> genocide. They do this even when the other side does not see itself in the >> same terms. >> >> The United States tried to fight guerrillas and terrorists as if they >> were modern states with their own industrial military organizations >> protecting their industrial core. This tactic made no sense in Vietnam or >> even Iraq because that wasn't the enemy we were facing. But states are >> built to fight other states. Tribes are built to fight other tribes. >> Religions are built to fight other religions. >> >> The modern multicultural super-tolerant western state of this century >> takes stock of its strongest point, and decides that it's not the old >> industrial machine, which destroys the environment, its traditional >> heritage, which is problematic, or its problem solving skills, which are >> too technical, but its values of super-tolerant multiculturalism. And so it >> wages war on those insane terms. >> >> The old Western model of war was brutal and efficient. Protect the >> industrial plant. Use it to churn out more military hardware. Smash the >> enemy. >> *The new Western model of war is protect social harmony. Create more >> diversity. And the enemy will eventually be drawn into our global harmony.* >> When liberals take every terror attack as an opportunity to lecture us on >> the vital importance of not losing "our values", they are in their own >> warped and useless way waging war. >> >> In the 20th century, war was distilled down to an industrial core. In the >> 21st century, the anti-industrial rebels who want to de-industrialize >> manufacturing while industrializing society, have distilled all that >> matters down to their values. In their confused world order, the terrorists >> are attacking "our values" and we in turn must attack "their values" with >> our superior "values". >> >> Barely half the country accepts their construct of what "our values" are >> and they have no idea whatsoever what "their values" are, but they assume >> that just as our values are "our values" so too "their values" are also >> "our values". This is the sort of thing you do if you're an ideologue. >> >> >> *And also it's a natural human shortcut. It's human nature to assume that >> people different from you are just dumber, nastier versions of yourself who >> have the same basic goals and organization as you do.* >> Ideologues are most likely to assume that everyone agrees with their >> premises, but just hasn't been shown the right textbooks. And these days >> ideologues and their textbooks dominate everything. >> >> To the left, Islam is an inefficient sort of Socialism dependent on >> medieval superstition and lacking modern idea. To Muslims, the left is an >> inefficient sort of Islam that's missing Allah, Mohammed and the Koran. >> It's all just a problem of explanations and textbooks. >> >> The left plans to defeat ISIS with "our values" by which it means showing >> how effective our social harmony is, which it isn't, by refusing to >> actually fight Islamic terrorism. >> *Eventually the Jihadists will give up their reactionary ways as the >> ordinary Muslims realizes that he has the same interests as the rest of the >> great rainbow coalition does. This hasn't even worked too well in Europe. * >> The left is a purely ideological entity and so it has reduced our >> countries and cultures to the transportable "our values". Despite Islam's >> ideological reach, it's not purely an ideological entity. >> >> At the ground floor, Islam is tribal. The Iraqis viewed us as the >> American Tribe. Tribes raid each other. Their members lash out and kill >> each other over insults. They count coup on each other. They steal and >> humiliate each other's women. Tribes are nomadic and they are concerned >> with honor. >> >> Tribes from Iraq, Syria and North Africa can come to Europe, set up their >> own territories, pile up loot and then humiliate the native women for New >> Year's Eve. And then laugh at the impotence of the European tribal >> authorities. >> >> The Islamic no-go zones are seen primarily as religious, but they are >> also tribal. Islam incorporates both. >> *Islamic migration also expands tribal territories. It's always been that >> way.* >> And this is also how Muslims fight us on a tribal level. They attack the >> honor of the European tribes. >> *But it's not as if the Merkel government or any of the other European >> Socialist governments have any concept of honor anyway.* >> While European Socialists attempt to integrate them with "our values", >> the ungrateful integratees show that the systems have no honor on a tribal >> level and are not worth taking seriously. >> >> >> >> *Beyond the tribal, is the religious. In Islam, religion remains limited >> to the most primitive level of "My tribal deity Allah is stronger than your >> deity because we beat you up."This is literally what Allahu Akbar means.* >> >> To the representatives of the secular West, religion is identical with >> "our values", which is to say that it contains nothing religious about it, >> certainly no claims which require divine validation or unique truths. Their >> religion is a spiritual background noise which affirms the essential >> position that we should be nice to each other while providing support for >> any leftist position of the moment. >> >> No meaningful dialogue is possible between Allahu Akbar and "Our values" >> because the two are not speaking the same language except in one sense, >> both insist on absolute submission. But the left's demand for submission is >> based on the absolute moral superiority of "Our values". Islam literally >> means submission, but its moral superiority is a revealed truth based on >> Islam's military victories. >> >> >> *Islam is right, because it won. It won, because it's right. There's your >> cycle of violence in a nutshell.* >> Islam sanctified the tribal raid as a religious act and turned the dead >> into martyrs. That's Jihad. Terrorism incorporates both the tribal and the >> religious. Islamic missionary activity in the West also targets >> dissatisfied minorities, potential fifth columns, in the same manner as the >> original Arab Islamic conquests did. Even here, Islam unites tribal and >> religious tactics. >> >> The final element of the tribal war is organizational. It is here that >> Islam attacks "Our values". >> >> Tribes are forever quarreling. They are weakest at their points of mutual >> association. This is how Mohammed originally got his start. Islam expanded >> initially more through clever games of divide and conquer than military >> strategy. >> >> To the Muslim mind, we are a series of fragile tribal associations. That >> is also how we appear to the "Our values" left. The "Our values" crowd >> thinks of the threat in terms of "radicalization", but the real threat is >> "integration". Mohammed did some of his best work by undermining from >> within. >> >> To undermine a tribal association, you have to be a part of it. Then you >> have to raise grievances, find other dissatisfied allies and eventually >> promise them better treatment under Islam. >> >> That's what Mohammed did. It's what his followers are doing today. >> >> This is where groups like the Muslim Brotherhood play the long game while >> ISIS plays the short game. >> >> The left's multicultural vision made this mess possible. It's also making >> it worse. The left despises tribal thinking and yet its entire political >> infrastructure is built on rewarding it. All Islamic organizations have had >> to do is built on the left's own work, joining its coalitions as Islamic >> groups, and then working to hijack them. The growing takeover of >> #BlackLivesMatter by Muslim groups is one example of the phenomenon. >> >> Our enemies are not states and they will not fight us as states. To the >> extent that they are tribal, they will fight us as tribes. To the extent >> that they are religious, in a primitive sort of way, they will attack us >> that way. But the real problem is that we are no longer states either. >> Instead we are in the grip of a mystical deluded cult that squawks of "Our >> values" while tribalizing and dividing us to push through discredited >> economic and social policies. They have opened the gates to a cruel, >> backward enemy. >> >> And in doing so, they have brought a tribal war into our own homelands. >> >> >> >> >> __._,_.___ >> ------------------------------ >> Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]> >> ------------------------------ >> >> >> Visit Your Group >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmYXMzZWdyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTI2MjY4ODY-> >> >> - New Members >> >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/members/all;_ylc=X3oDMTJndjlxNzY5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2bWJycwRzdGltZQMxNDUyNjI2ODg2> >> 1 >> >> [image: Yahoo! Groups] >> <https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlaDRhdnE4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1MjYyNjg4Ng--> >> • Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> >> • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use >> <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/> >> >> __,_._,___ >> >> >> -- > -- > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum > > * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. > * Read the latest breaking news, and more. > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "PoliticalForum" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PoliticalForum" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
