*A must read and pass on!  *


*This is circulating on the Internet but for the record (despite the nice
attribution to the liberal rag Newsweek  which did finally close it door…
it was NOT published in Newsweek  or as other versions have noted in the
left wing Washington Post.   Matt Patterson IS the author of this article
however…  but it was published as “ The Affirmative Action President” and
WAS written by Matt Patterson, which appeared in the  American Thinker on
August 18, 2011
<http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/08/obama_the_affirmative_action_president.html>.
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/08/obama_the_affirmative_action_president.html
<http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2011/08/obama_the_affirmative_action_president.html>*









*Subject:* *NEWSWEEK CLOSED ITS DOORS WITH A BANG!!!! Re: President Obama*

Newsweek Closed Its Doors with a Slam at Obama


Newsweek Is Now History.  The liberal Newsweek Magazine is going out of
business, but not before it attacks the President.  This is quite an
article, even more so when you consider that NEWSWEEK finally had the guts
to admit it. WOW!  Newsweek COVER!!!  It is their last cover before they
fold.  Also read the article at the end. AMAZING!!!

Finally, Matt Patterson and Newsweek speak out about Obama.  This is timely
and tough.  As many of you know, Newsweek has a reputation for being
extremely liberal.  The fact that their editor saw fit to print the
following article about Obama and the one that appears in the latest
Newsweek, makes this a truly amazing event, and a news story in and of
itself.  At last, the truth about our President and his Agenda are starting
to trickle through the protective wall built around him by the liberal
media...





By Matt Patterson
(Newsweek Columnist -- Opinion Writer)

Years from now, historians may regard the 2008 election of Barack Obama as
an inscrutable and phenomenon, the result of a baffling breed of mass
hysteria akin perhaps to the witch craze of the Middle Ages.  How, they
will wonder, did a man so devoid of professional accomplishment beguile so
many into thinking he could manage the world's largest economy, direct the
world's most powerful military, execute the world's most consequential job?

Imagine a future historian examining Obama's pre-presidential life: ushered
into and through the Ivy League, despite unremarkable grades and test
scores along the way; a cushy non-job as a "community organizer;" a brief
career as a state legislator devoid of legislative achievement (and in fact
nearly devoid of his attention, less often did he vote "present"); and
finally an unaccomplished single term in the United States Senate, the
entirety of which was devoted to his presidential ambitions.

He left no academic legacy in academia, authored no signature legislation
as a legislator.  And then there is the matter of his troubling
associations: the white-hating, America-loathing preacher who for decades
served as Obama's "spiritual mentor;" a real-life, actual terrorist who
served as Obama's colleague and political sponsor.  It is easy to imagine a
future historian looking at it all and asking: how on Earth was such a man
elected president?  There is no evidence that he ever attended or worked
for any university or that he ever sat for the Illinois bar.  We have no
documentation for any of his claims.  He may well be the greatest hoax in
history. Not content to wait for history, the incomparable Norman Podhoretz
addressed the question recently in the Wall Street Journal: To be sure, no
white candidate who had close associations with an outspoken hater of
America like Jeremiah Wright and an unrepentant terrorist like Bill Ayers,
would have lasted a single day.



But because Mr.  Obama was black, and therefore entitled in the eyes of
liberal Dom to have hung out with protesters against various American
injustices, even if they were 'a bit' extreme, he was given a pass.  Let
that Sink in: Obama was given a pass - held to a lower standard because of
the color of his skin.  Podhoretz continues: And in any case, what did such
ancient history matter when he was also so articulate and elegant and (as
he himself had said) "non-threatening," all of which gave him a fighting
chance to become the first black president and thereby to lay the curse of
racism to rest? Podhoretz puts his finger, I think, on the animating pulse
of the Obama phenomenon - affirmative action.  Not in the legal sense, of
course.  But certainly in the motivating sentiment behind all affirmative
action laws and regulations, which are designed primarily to make white
people, and especially white liberals, feel good about themselves.
Unfortunately, minorities often suffer so that whites can pat themselves on
the back.

Liberals routinely admit minorities to schools for which they are not
qualified, yet take no responsibility for the inevitable poor performance
and high drop-out rates which follow.  Liberals don't care if these
minority students fail; liberals aren't around to witness the emotional
devastation and deflated self-esteem resulting from the racist policy that
is affirmative action.  Yes, racist.  Holding someone to a separate
standard merely because of the color of his skin - that's affirmative
action in a nutshell, and if that isn't racism, then nothing is.  And that
is what America did to Obama.  True, Obama himself was never troubled by
his lack of achievements, but why would he be?  As many have noted, Obama
was told he was good enough for Columbia despite undistinguished grades at
Occidental; he was told he was good enough for the US Senate despite a
mediocre record in Illinois; he was told he was good enough to be president
despite no record at all in the Senate.  All his life, every step of the
way, Obama was told he was good enough for the next step, in spite of ample
evidence to the contrary.

What could this breed if not the sort of empty narcissism on display every
time Obama speaks?  In 2008, many who agreed that he lacked executive
qualifications nonetheless raved about Obama's oratory skills, intellect,
and cool character.  Those people - conservatives included - ought now to
be deeply embarrassed.  The man thinks and speaks in the hoariest of
clichés, and that's when he has his Teleprompters in front of him; when the
prompter is absent he can barely think or speak at all.  Not one original
idea has ever issued from his mouth - it's all warmed-over Marxism of the
kind that has failed over and over again for 100 years.  (An example is his
2012 campaign speeches which are almost word for word his 2008 speeches)



And what about his character?  Obama is constantly blaming anything and
everything else for his troubles.  Bush did it; it was bad luck; I
inherited this mess. Remember, he wanted the job, campaigned for the task.
It is embarrassing to see a president so willing to advertise his own
powerlessness, so comfortable with his own incompetence.  (The other day he
actually came out and said no one could have done anything to get our
economy and country back on track).  But really, what were we to expect?
The man has never been responsible for anything, so how do we expect him to
act responsibly?

In short: our president is a small-minded man, with neither the temperament
nor the intellect to handle his job.  When you understand that, and only
when you understand that, will the current erosion of liberty and
prosperity make sense.  It could not have gone otherwise with such an
impostor in the Oval Office.

P.S.  Please send this article to family and friends throughout America and
ask them to read and distribute this article to others.


























__._,_.___
------------------------------
Posted by: "Beowulf" <[email protected]>
------------------------------


Visit Your Group
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/grendelreport/info;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZmcwazdmBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzE0NTYyMzkxMDQ->


[image: Yahoo! Groups]
<https://groups.yahoo.com/neo;_ylc=X3oDMTJlNnVwbnRuBF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycElkAzIwMTk0ODA2BGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTMyMzY2NwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTQ1NjIzOTEwNA-->
• Privacy <https://info.yahoo.com/privacy/us/yahoo/groups/details.html> •
Unsubscribe <[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe>
• Terms of Use <https://info.yahoo.com/legal/us/yahoo/utos/terms/>

__,_._,___

-- 
-- 
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/  
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. 
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"PoliticalForum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to